18-Env-B5 Industrial & Hazardous Waste Management · May 2015
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Reference texts: Nemerow & Dasgupta, Industrial and Hazardous Waste Treatment, 2nd ed.; Metcalf & Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th ed.; Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering, 6th ed.; LaGrega, Buckingham & Evans, Hazardous Waste Management, 2nd ed.; CCME, Guidelines for the Management of Biomedical Waste in Canada (1992); Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), 1999; Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes (1989); provincial hazardous waste regulations (e.g. BC's Environmental Management Act and Hazardous Waste Regulation).
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
The first factor is the characteristics of the waste itself — its flow rate and flow variability, organic strength (BOD5/COD), suspended-solids content, pH, temperature, and the presence of any toxic or inhibitory constituents, since these determine which treatment mechanisms (biological, physical, chemical) are even applicable. The second is the required degree of treatment, set by the discharge standard the effluent must meet — a municipal sewer-use bylaw limit is typically far less stringent than a direct-discharge permit to a sensitive receiving water, and the gap between influent waste strength and the target effluent quality is what actually sizes the process train. The third is cost-effectiveness and reliability, including capital cost, operating and maintenance cost, available land area, and the operator skill level required to run the process reliably — a technically superior process that a small municipality or industry cannot afford or operate consistently is not, in practice, the right selection.