Check: the source prints the industrial wastewater-generation factors as "10,000E/tonne production" and "100,000E/tonne production." Read literally as population-equivalents-per-tonne, this would make sub-part 11.3 circular — the question separately asks to determine the cannery's PE, which cannot already be given as raw data. It is also inconsistent with the paired mg/L concentrations, which need a flow rate (not a population count) to convert to a mass load. Read instead as 10,000 L/tonne and 100,000 L/tonne (a wastewater-generation-rate factor, "E" being a misprint of "L"), consistent with the classic textbook method for this exact problem type (flow-per-unit-production × concentration → mass load; mass load ÷ domestic per-capita rate → PE) and with this paper's other misprints (e.g. "BODS" for "BOD5," "C6HSOH" for "C6H5OH" in Question 8). This reading is what is solved below; it consumes every given number exactly once with no redundancy.
Given. Municipal population and domestic per-capita flow/strength, plus a flow-generation factor and wastewater strength for each of two industries.
Given data
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Population
P
10,000
Domestic flow
—
400 L/cap·day
Domestic BOD5 / SS (concentration)
—
190 / 225 mg/L
Cannery production
—
5,000 tonnes over a 7-month season
Cannery wastewater factor / BOD5 / SS
—
10,000 L/tonne; 1,200 / 700 mg/L
Textile production
—
2,000 kg/day = 2.0 tonnes/day
Textile wastewater factor / BOD5 / SS
—
100,000 L/tonne; 400 / 100 mg/L
Find. (11.1) municipal BOD5/SS mass loading and concentration with the two industries served, (11.2) the same without them, and (11.3) the population equivalent of the cannery on a BOD5 basis.
Approach. Convert each industry's production rate to a daily basis, apply its wastewater-generation factor to get flow, multiply flow by concentration to get a daily mass load, sum with the domestic load for "with industries" (dividing by total flow for the combined concentration), and express the cannery's own BOD5 load as a population equivalent using the domestic per-capita BOD5 rate.
(11.2) Content without the industries (domestic only). This is simply the given residential wastewater itself:
$$\boxed{BOD_{without} = 190\ \text{mg/L}\ (760\ \text{kg/day})}, \qquad \boxed{SS_{without} = 225\ \text{mg/L}\ (900\ \text{kg/day})}$$
(11.3) Population equivalent of the cannery, BOD5 basis. PE expresses the cannery's own BOD5 load in terms of an equivalent number of people, using the domestic per-capita rate found in Step 1:
$$PE_{cannery} = \dfrac{BOD_{cannery}}{76\ \text{g/cap}\cdot\text{day}} = \dfrac{281{,}640\ \text{g/day}}{76\ \text{g/cap}\cdot\text{day}}$$
$$\boxed{PE_{cannery} \approx 3{,}706\ \text{people}}$$
Final results
Quantity
Value
BOD5, without industries (11.2)
190 mg/L (760 kg/day)
SS, without industries (11.2)
225 mg/L (900 kg/day)
BOD5, with industries (11.1)
≈ 253 mg/L (1,122 kg/day)
SS, with industries (11.1)
≈ 245 mg/L (1,084 kg/day)
Population equivalent of cannery, BOD5 basis (11.3)
≈ 3,706 PE
Serving the two industries raises the municipal BOD5 concentration by roughly a third (190 → 253 mg/L) even though the cannery operates only 7 months of the year, and the cannery alone contributes an organic load equivalent to more than a third of the municipality's own resident population — a material addition a treatment plant sized on population alone would not accommodate.