Question 4 of 7: Thermodynamics of Sulfuric Acid Formation from Elemental Sulfur
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams — May 2017 — 10-Met-A1 Metallurgical Thermodynamics. Three-hour, closed-book exam using an approved (Casio or Sharp) calculator; candidates were told to state any interpretive assumptions. Any five of the seven questions constitute a complete paper — all seven are solved below for completeness. All questions are of equal value (20 marks each out of 100).
Reference texts: Gaskell, D. R., Introduction to the Thermodynamics of Materials (2nd–5th ed.) — source of the first-law/second-law relations used throughout and of the attached Ellingham diagram (Fig. 9-3) and its underlying 298 K formation data used in Question 7; supporting 298 K entropies for CO(g), CO₂(g), H₂(g) and H₂O(g) from the NIST–JANAF Thermochemical Tables.
Question 4: Thermodynamics of Sulfuric Acid Formation from Elemental Sulfur (20 marks)
Given. $T=298$ K (25 °C). Standard enthalpies of formation and standard entropies (all per mole, kJ or J K−1):
Given data — 298 K standard-state properties
Compound
ΔH°f (kJ mol−1)
S° (J K−1 mol−1)
S(s)
0
32
O₂(g)
0
205
SO₂(g)
−297
248
SO₃(g)
−396
257
H₂O(l)
−286
70
H₂SO₄(l)
−814
157
Find. $\Delta H^\circ$, $\Delta S^\circ$, $\Delta G^\circ$ and $K$ at 298 K for reactions (1)–(3); the balanced overall reaction $S+O_2+H_2O\to H_2SO_4$ and its $\Delta H^\circ$, $\Delta S^\circ$, $\Delta G^\circ$.
Approach. Apply Hess's law ($\Delta H^\circ=\sum\nu_i\Delta H^\circ_{f,i}$, $\Delta S^\circ=\sum\nu_iS^\circ_i$) to each reaction as written, form $\Delta G^\circ=\Delta H^\circ-T\Delta S^\circ$ and $K=\exp(-\Delta G^\circ/RT)$, then combine reactions (1)–(3) stoichiometrically for the overall path.
(d) Equilibrium constants. $K=\exp(-\Delta G^\circ/RT)$, $RT=(8.314)(298.15)=2478.8$ J:
$$\log_{10}K_1=\dfrac{-\Delta G^\circ_1}{2.303\,RT}=\boxed{52.6},\qquad \log_{10}K_2=\boxed{24.9},\qquad \log_{10}K_3=\boxed{14.2}.$$
All three reactions run essentially to completion at 298 K — consistent with strongly negative $\Delta G^\circ$ values in every step.
(e) Balanced overall reaction. Doubling (1) so it supplies the 2 mol SO₂ that (2) consumes, adding (2), then doubling (3) to consume the 2 mol SO₃ produced, and halving the sum:
$$2\times(1):\ 2S+2O_2=2SO_2,\qquad (2):\ 2SO_2+O_2=2SO_3,\qquad 2\times(3):\ 2SO_3+2H_2O=2H_2SO_4.$$
Summing and dividing by 2:
$$\boxed{S(s)+\tfrac32O_2(g)+H_2O(l)\ \longrightarrow\ H_2SO_4(l)}.$$
(f)–(h) Thermodynamics of the balanced reaction. Either sum $\bigl(2\Delta X_1+\Delta X_2+2\Delta X_3\bigr)/2$ for $X=H,S$, or apply Hess's law directly from formation data (both agree):
$$\Delta H^\circ_e=\Delta H^\circ_f(H_2SO_4)-\Delta H^\circ_f(S)-\tfrac32\Delta H^\circ_f(O_2)-\Delta H^\circ_f(H_2O)=-814-0-0-(-286)=\boxed{-528\ \text{kJ}},$$
$$\Delta S^\circ_e=S^\circ(H_2SO_4)-S^\circ(S)-\tfrac32S^\circ(O_2)-S^\circ(H_2O)=157-32-307.5-70=\boxed{-252.5\ \text{J}\,\text{K}^{-1}},$$
$$\Delta G^\circ_e=\Delta H^\circ_e-T\Delta S^\circ_e=-528{,}000-(298)(-252.5)=\boxed{-452.7\ \text{kJ}}.$$