NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

21-Mat-A1 Thermodynamics · May 2017

Question 6 of 7: Galvanic Cell Thermodynamics for Ba/Cu 2+

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — May 2017 — 10-Met-A1 Metallurgical Thermodynamics. Three-hour, closed-book exam using an approved (Casio or Sharp) calculator; candidates were told to state any interpretive assumptions. Any five of the seven questions constitute a complete paper — all seven are solved below for completeness. All questions are of equal value (20 marks each out of 100).

Reference texts: Gaskell, D. R., Introduction to the Thermodynamics of Materials (2nd–5th ed.) — source of the first-law/second-law relations used throughout and of the attached Ellingham diagram (Fig. 9-3) and its underlying 298 K formation data used in Question 7; supporting 298 K entropies for CO(g), CO₂(g), H₂(g) and H₂O(g) from the NIST–JANAF Thermochemical Tables.

Question 6: Galvanic Cell Thermodynamics for Ba/Cu2+ (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Cell reaction $Ba(s)+Cu^{2+}(aq)\to Ba^{2+}(aq)+Cu(s)$; $E^\circ(Cu^{2+}/Cu)=+0.34$ V, $E^\circ(Ba^{2+}/Ba)=-2.92$ V; $T=298$ K; part (d) concentrations $[Cu^{2+}]=0.5$ M, $[Ba^{2+}]=2.0$ M.

Find. $E^\circ_{cell}$, $\Delta G^\circ$, $K$, and the concentration-adjusted cell potential $E$.

Approach. Identify Cu2+/Cu as the reduction (cathode) and Ba/Ba2+ as the oxidation (anode), so $E^\circ_{cell}=E^\circ_{cathode}-E^\circ_{anode}$; convert to $\Delta G^\circ=-nFE^\circ$ and $K$ via $\Delta G^\circ=-RT\ln K$; then apply the Nernst equation for part (d).

  1. (a) Standard cell potential. Cu2+ is reduced at the cathode, Ba is oxidised at the anode: $$E^\circ_{cell}=E^\circ_{cathode}-E^\circ_{anode}=0.34-(-2.92)=\boxed{+3.26\ \text{V}}.$$
  2. (b) Standard free energy. $n=2$ electrons transfer per formula unit ($F=96{,}485$ C/mol): $$\Delta G^\circ=-nFE^\circ_{cell}=-(2)(96{,}485)(3.26)=\boxed{-629.1\ \text{kJ}}.$$
  3. (c) Equilibrium constant. $\Delta G^\circ=-RT\ln K$ at $T=298.15$ K: $$\ln K=\dfrac{-\Delta G^\circ}{RT}=\dfrac{629{,}100}{(8.314)(298.15)}=253.8\ \Rightarrow\ \log_{10}K=\boxed{110.2}.$$ $K$ is astronomically large, as expected from a strongly positive $E^\circ_{cell}$ — the reaction runs essentially to completion.
  4. (d) Nernst equation at the stated concentrations. $Ba(s)$ and $Cu(s)$ are pure solids (activity 1), so $Q=[Ba^{2+}]/[Cu^{2+}]=2.0/0.5=4.0$: $$E=E^\circ_{cell}-\dfrac{RT}{nF}\ln Q=3.26-\dfrac{(8.314)(298.15)}{(2)(96{,}485)}\ln(4.0)=3.26-0.0128(1.386)=\boxed{3.242\ \text{V}}.$$ Away from standard concentrations the cell potential barely moves (−18 mV) because the $\ln Q$ term is scaled by the small factor $RT/nF\approx13$ mV, while $E^\circ_{cell}$ itself is over 3 V.
QuantityValue
$E^\circ_{cell}$+3.26 V
$\Delta G^\circ$−629.1 kJ
$\log_{10}K$110.2
$E$ ($[Cu^{2+}]=0.5$ M, $[Ba^{2+}]=2.0$ M)+3.242 V