NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

21-Mat-A4 Deformation Behaviour and Properties of Materials · May 2013

Question 3 of 8: Question III — Point Defects in Crystals (20 marks)

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, May 2013 — 10-Met-A4, Structure of Materials. Three hours, closed book, one approved calculator (Casio or Sharp). Eight questions of 20 marks each; the rubric asks for any five, and only the first five in the answer book are marked. All eight are solved here, because this set is a study resource rather than an exam script. All necessary constants and equations are provided in the exam's own appendix; standard SI values (Planck's constant, electron mass, Avogadro's number) are used below and are noted where that happens.

The printed exam header reads 10-Met-A4, Structure of Materials. Two of the eight questions (V and VI) are genuinely deformation/mechanical-properties questions, but the paper as a whole is a broad introductory materials-science survey — bonding, crystallography, defects, diffusion, dislocations, XRD and phase diagrams — and is answered as such below.

Reference texts. The answers below are keyed to the works normally recommended for this syllabus code:


Question III — Point Defects in Crystals (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

III.1 — Interstitial vs. substitutional solid solutions

A substitutional solid solution forms when solute atoms directly replace solvent atoms on the parent lattice sites; an interstitial solid solution forms when (typically small) solute atoms instead squeeze into the voids between the solvent atoms on their normal sites, without displacing them. Interstitial solutes are almost always much smaller than the solvent atom (carbon or nitrogen in iron is the classic example); substitutional solutes are comparable in size to the solvent.

The Hume-Rothery rules identify the parameters that favour extensive (ideally complete) substitutional solid solubility: (i) an atomic size difference below about 15% — larger mismatches build up too much lattice strain energy; (ii) similar crystal structures for the two pure elements; (iii) similar electronegativity — a large difference favours compound formation (ionic/intermetallic) over solid solution; (iv) similar valence, or a solute valence no higher than the solvent's (a higher-valence solute donates electrons the solvent lattice can only accommodate in limited amounts before a different phase becomes favourable).

III.2 — Largest FCC interstitial void

Given. FCC γ-iron, atomic radius $R = 0.129\ \text{nm}$; the largest voids are the octahedral sites at $(\tfrac12,0,0)$-type positions.

Find. The radius of the largest interstitial (octahedral) void.

Approach. The octahedral site in FCC is surrounded by six touching host atoms along the cell-edge directions; the geometric ratio of void radius to host radius for this coordination is a standard result, $r_{\text{void}}/R = \sqrt{2}-1$.

  1. Geometry of the octahedral hole. The site at $(\tfrac12,0,0)$ sits at the midpoint of a cube edge, midway between two corner atoms and equidistant from four face-centred atoms; along that edge, $a = 2R\sqrt{2}$ (FCC face-diagonal contact) and the void radius satisfies $R + r_{\text{void}} = a/2$, giving $r_{\text{void}} = R(\sqrt2-1)$.
  2. Evaluate. $$r_{\text{void}} = (\sqrt{2}-1)(0.129) = \boxed{0.0534\ \text{nm} = 53.4\ \text{pm}}$$ This is the maximum sphere that fits in the octahedral hole without displacing the surrounding Fe atoms — carbon (atomic radius ≈0.077 nm) is substantially larger than this void, which is exactly why interstitial carbon locally strains the γ-iron lattice and why carbon solubility in γ-Fe (up to ≈2 wt%) is far higher than in the smaller octahedral/tetrahedral voids of α-Fe (BCC).

III.3 — Tin-bronze: atomic concentration of Sn

Given. Sn substitutionally dissolved in Cu (FCC), lattice parameter $a = 0.376\ \text{nm}$, density $\rho = 8.772\ \text{g/cm}^3$; $M_{Sn}=118.71\ \text{g/mol}$, $M_{Cu}=63.546\ \text{g/mol}$; FCC has $n=4$ atoms/cell.

Find. The atomic fraction (at%) of tin in the alloy.

Approach. Write the cell mass as a composition-weighted average atomic mass and solve the density formula for the tin atomic fraction $x$.

  1. Density formula with a mixed atomic mass. With $x$ the atomic fraction Sn (so $1-x$ is Cu), the average atomic mass is $\bar M = xM_{Sn}+(1-x)M_{Cu}$ and $$\rho = \frac{n\bar M}{N_A a^3}$$
  2. Solve for $x$. With $a = 3.76\times10^{-8}\ \text{cm}$, $a^3 = 5.316\times10^{-23}\ \text{cm}^3$: $$\bar M = \frac{\rho N_A a^3}{n} = \frac{(8.772)(6.023\times10^{23})(5.316\times10^{-23})}{4} = 70.09\ \text{g/mol}$$ $$x = \frac{\bar M - M_{Cu}}{M_{Sn}-M_{Cu}} = \frac{70.09-63.546}{118.71-63.546} = \boxed{0.1209 = 12.1\ \text{at\% Sn}}$$
Question III — final results
QuantityValue
Largest FCC octahedral void radius0.0534 nm
Atomic concentration of Sn12.1 at%