21-Mat-A4 Deformation Behaviour and Properties of Materials · May 2013
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Paper format. National Exams, May 2013 — 10-Met-A4, Structure of Materials. Three hours, closed book, one approved calculator (Casio or Sharp). Eight questions of 20 marks each; the rubric asks for any five, and only the first five in the answer book are marked. All eight are solved here, because this set is a study resource rather than an exam script. All necessary constants and equations are provided in the exam's own appendix; standard SI values (Planck's constant, electron mass, Avogadro's number) are used below and are noted where that happens.
The printed exam header reads 10-Met-A4, Structure of Materials. Two of the eight questions (V and VI) are genuinely deformation/mechanical-properties questions, but the paper as a whole is a broad introductory materials-science survey — bonding, crystallography, defects, diffusion, dislocations, XRD and phase diagrams — and is answered as such below.
Reference texts. The answers below are keyed to the works normally recommended for this syllabus code:
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Bragg's law, $n\lambda = 2d\sin\theta$, relates each diffraction peak's angle to the spacing $d_{hkl}$ of the reflecting plane family; combined with the cubic interplanar-spacing relation $d_{hkl}=a/\sqrt{h^2+k^2+l^2}$, every measured $2\theta$ converts to a value of $\sqrt{h^2+k^2+l^2}$ once the lattice parameter is known (or, conversely, the ratios of $\sin^2\theta$ between peaks give the ratios of $h^2+k^2+l^2$ directly, without needing $a$ first). The key discriminator is the structure-factor selection rule, which forbids different sets of reflections in FCC and BCC because of destructive interference from the extra (non-primitive) lattice points:
In practice: index the observed peaks by their $\sin^2\theta$ ratios (which are proportional to $h^2+k^2+l^2$), reduce those ratios to the smallest integer set, and compare the pattern of allowed $(hkl)$ against the two selection rules above — e.g. a first peak with $h^2+k^2+l^2=2$ (i.e. (110)) identifies BCC, whereas a first peak with $h^2+k^2+l^2=3$ (i.e. (111)) identifies FCC. This is exactly the method applied to niobium below.
Given. BCC niobium; $(211)$ reflection at $2\theta=75.99^\circ$ (first order, $n=1$); $\lambda=0.1659\ \text{nm}$.
Find. $d_{211}$, the atomic radius of Nb, and the lowest-angle allowed peak (its $(hkl)$ and $2\theta$).
Approach. Get $d_{211}$ from Bragg's law, then the lattice parameter from the cubic $d$-spacing relation, then the atomic radius from the BCC body-diagonal contact condition; finally identify the smallest allowed $h^2+k^2+l^2$ for BCC to locate the lowest-angle peak.
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| $d_{211}$ | 0.1347 nm |
| Lattice parameter, $a$ | 0.3301 nm |
| Atomic radius, $R_{Nb}$ | 0.1429 nm |
| Lowest-angle peak | (110) at $2\theta=41.6^\circ$ |