NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

21-Mat-A4 Deformation Behaviour and Properties of Materials · May 2013

Question 6 of 8: Mechanical Deformation (20 marks)

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, May 2013 — 10-Met-A4, Structure of Materials. Three hours, closed book, one approved calculator (Casio or Sharp). Eight questions of 20 marks each; the rubric asks for any five, and only the first five in the answer book are marked. All eight are solved here, because this set is a study resource rather than an exam script. All necessary constants and equations are provided in the exam's own appendix; standard SI values (Planck's constant, electron mass, Avogadro's number) are used below and are noted where that happens.

The printed exam header reads 10-Met-A4, Structure of Materials. Two of the eight questions (V and VI) are genuinely deformation/mechanical-properties questions, but the paper as a whole is a broad introductory materials-science survey — bonding, crystallography, defects, diffusion, dislocations, XRD and phase diagrams — and is answered as such below.

Reference texts. The answers below are keyed to the works normally recommended for this syllabus code:


Question VI — Mechanical Deformation (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

VI.1 — Yield vs. ultimate strength; engineering vs. true stress

(a) The yield strength marks the stress at which the material's response first departs measurably from linear-elastic behaviour and permanent (plastic) deformation begins — in practice usually taken as the 0.2% offset stress. The ultimate tensile strength is the maximum engineering stress reached anywhere on the stress–strain curve, corresponding to the onset of necking in a ductile metal; beyond it the engineering stress falls even though the true stress in the necked region keeps rising, because the nominal (original) cross-sectional area used to compute engineering stress no longer represents the load-bearing area.

(b) Engineering stress/strain are computed against the specimen's original, undeformed dimensions ($\sigma_e = F/A_0$, $\epsilon_e = \Delta L/L_0$). True stress/strain are computed against the specimen's instantaneous (current) dimensions ($\sigma_T = F/A_i$, $\epsilon_T=\ln(L_i/L_0)$). The two coincide only at small strain; once necking begins the instantaneous area shrinks faster than the engineering formula assumes, so true stress runs measurably above engineering stress for the same load.

VI.2 — Rod under load: stress, strain, yield and stored energy

Given.

Given data — loaded rod
QuantityValue
Original length, $L_0$25 cm
Original diameter, $d_0$0.25 cm
Diameter under load, $d_f$0.23 cm
Applied load, $F$2 kN
Young's modulus, $E$210 GPa
Assumed yield elongation, $\epsilon_y$2.2%

Find. The final length (a); true stress and strain (b); engineering stress and strain (c); the yield strength and elastic strain energy to yield, taking the 2.2% yield-elongation datum as a separately supplied value for that sub-part (d).

Approach. Use volume conservation to get the deformed length and hence true strain directly; get engineering values from the original dimensions; get the yield strength from Hooke's law applied at the stated yield strain, and the stored elastic energy from the strain-energy-density integral up to yield.

  1. (a) Final length from volume conservation. $A_0=\pi(d_0/2)^2=0.04909\ \text{cm}^2$, $A_f=\pi(d_f/2)^2=0.04155\ \text{cm}^2$; $A_0L_0=A_fL_f$: $$L_f = L_0\frac{A_0}{A_f} = 25\times\frac{0.04909}{0.04155} = \boxed{29.5\ \text{cm}}$$
  2. (b) True stress and true strain. True strain from the length ratio (equivalently $\ln(A_0/A_f)$, same result by volume conservation): $$\epsilon_T = \ln\!\left(\frac{L_f}{L_0}\right) = \ln\!\left(\frac{29.54}{25}\right) = \boxed{0.167}$$ True stress uses the current (necked) area, $A_f = 4.155\times10^{-6}\ \text{m}^2$: $$\sigma_T = \frac{F}{A_f} = \frac{2000}{4.155\times10^{-6}} = \boxed{481\ \text{MPa}}$$
  3. (c) Engineering stress and strain. Both referenced to the original dimensions, $A_0 = 4.909\times10^{-6}\ \text{m}^2$: $$\epsilon_e = \frac{L_f-L_0}{L_0} = \frac{29.54-25}{25} = \boxed{0.181\ (18.1\%)}$$ $$\sigma_e = \frac{F}{A_0} = \frac{2000}{4.909\times10^{-6}} = \boxed{407\ \text{MPa}}$$
  4. (d) Yield strength and elastic energy to yield. Linear-elastic behaviour up to the stated 2.2% yield strain gives, by Hooke's law, $$\sigma_y = E\epsilon_y = (210\,000\ \text{MPa})(0.022) = \boxed{4620\ \text{MPa}}$$ The elastic strain energy stored up to yield is the area under the linear elastic line, $u=\tfrac12\sigma_y\epsilon_y$ per unit volume, times the original volume $V_0=A_0L_0$ ($L_0=0.25\ \text{m}$, $V_0=1.227\times10^{-6}\ \text{m}^3$): $$U = \tfrac12\sigma_y\epsilon_y V_0 = \tfrac12(4.62\times10^9)(0.022)(1.227\times10^{-6}) = \boxed{62.4\ \text{J}}$$

Check. Part (d)'s 2.2% yield elongation is taken as an independent datum supplied for that sub-part, as the question states ("assuming 2.2% elongation at the yield point"); it is not physically consistent with the 407–481 MPa flow stress found for the loaded state in (b)/(c), since a 2.2% elastic strain at $E=210$ GPa implies a yield stress (4620 MPa) far above the stress actually carried at the load analysed in (a)–(c). Each sub-part is solved from its own stated given values, as is standard when an exam question supplies a separate hypothetical for one sub-part.

Question VI.2 — final results
QuantityValue
Final length, $L_f$29.5 cm
True strain0.167 (16.7%)
True stress481 MPa
Engineering strain0.181 (18.1%)
Engineering stress407 MPa
Yield strength, $\sigma_y$ (part d)4620 MPa
Elastic energy to yield, $U$62.4 J