22-Mec-A2 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines · December 2019
Question 8 of 8: Spring design for a helicopter‑suspended patient bed (bounce & pitch)
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, December 2019 — 16‑Mec‑A2 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines, 3 hours, open book. Part A (mechanisms & machine dynamics, Q1–Q6) and Part B (mechanical vibration, Q7–Q8). The rubric is “a complete set is five questions: everyone answers Q1 in Part A, one of the two Part B questions, and any three of the remaining six.” Every one of the eight questions is solved here.
Reference texts (subject). R. L. Norton, Design of Machinery, 6th ed. (mobility/number synthesis Ch. 2, position & velocity Ch. 4–6, cam design Ch. 8, epicyclic trains §9.6–9.9, balancing Ch. 13); J. J. Uicker, G. R. Pennock & J. E. Shigley, Theory of Machines and Mechanisms, 5th ed.; C. E. Wilson & J. P. Sadler, Kinematics and Dynamics of Machinery, 3rd ed.; S. S. Rao, Mechanical Vibrations, 6th ed. (Part B).
Check — incomplete data (please read). Several figures are printed without dimensions, and the problem statements on the cam (Q5), pendulum (Q7) and helicopter-bed (Q8) pages are fragmentary. Accordingly:
Questions whose data survive intact — Q4 (3‑cylinder engine), Q5 (cam timing), Q7 (pendulum impact) — are solved to full numeric answers.
The figure‑geometry questions (Q1, Q2, Q3) and the sectional gear train (Q6) carry no printed dimensions. They are solved by complete method, with clearly‑flagged representative geometry so the procedure is fully worked and study‑usable; scale‑free results (mobility, Grashof class, angular‑velocity ratios, the balancing scheme) are exact regardless.
Q7’s release angle and Q8’s bed mass / inertia units are assumed; stated assumptions are flagged inline (Check).
Question 8 — Spring design for a helicopter‑suspended patient bed (bounce & pitch) (20 marks — Part B)
Given / Find. Bed length $L=2$ m, four corner springs at $\pm a=\pm L/2=\pm1$ m from the C.G., excitation band $10$–$20$ Hz. Design the spring rate so that both the bounce (vertical) and pitch (rotational) natural frequencies lie safely below the excitation band, and check the static deflection.
Check — missing/corrupted data. The paper gives no patient‑bed mass $M$ and no units for $I_G$ (printed “$0.2$”). Taken literally, $I_G=0.2$ kg·m$^2$ makes the pitch frequency $\sim100$ Hz for a 2‑m bed — physically impossible — so the value is incomplete. The design below uses a representative $M=120$ kg (bed + patient) and the physical uniform‑bed inertia $I_G=ML^2/12=40$ kg·m$^2$; the method and criterion are exact, only the numbers are illustrative.
Approach. Model the bed as a 2‑DOF rigid body: vertical bounce $y$ and pitch $\theta$ about the C.G. Vibration isolation requires the natural frequencies well below the forcing band (transmissibility $T_R\lt1$ needs frequency ratio $r=f/f_n\gt\sqrt2$), so target $f_n\le f_{\min}/\sqrt2\approx7$ Hz; a softer $f_n\approx4$ Hz gives good isolation. Size the springs from that target and the static‑deflection relation.
Natural frequencies (2‑DOF, symmetric mounting). With four equal springs (total rate $k_{\text{tot}}=4k$) symmetric about the C.G., bounce and pitch decouple:
$$f_{\text{bounce}}=\frac{1}{2\pi}\sqrt{\frac{k_{\text{tot}}}{M}},\qquad f_{\text{pitch}}=\frac{1}{2\pi}\sqrt{\frac{K_\theta}{I_G}},\quad K_\theta=k_{\text{tot}}\,a^2.$$
Static‑deflection design (bounce). Target $f_{\text{bounce}}=4$ Hz. Since $f_n=\tfrac1{2\pi}\sqrt{g/\delta_{st}}$,
$$\delta_{st}=\frac{g}{(2\pi f_n)^2}=\frac{9.81}{(2\pi\cdot4)^2}=\boxed{15.5\ \text{mm}},$$
a sensible static sag. The total and per‑spring rates:
$$k_{\text{tot}}=\frac{Mg}{\delta_{st}}=\frac{120(9.81)}{0.0155}\approx75.8\ \text{kN/m},\qquad k=\frac{k_{\text{tot}}}{4}\approx\boxed{18.9\ \text{kN/m per spring}}.$$
Pitch check. $K_\theta=k_{\text{tot}}a^2=75.8(1)^2=75.8$ kN·m/rad, so
$$f_{\text{pitch}}=\frac{1}{2\pi}\sqrt{\frac{75\,800}{40}}=\boxed{6.9\ \text{Hz}}.$$
Both $f_{\text{bounce}}=4.0$ Hz and $f_{\text{pitch}}=6.9$ Hz are below the $10$ Hz lower excitation, so neither mode resonates in the $10$–$20$ Hz band.
Isolation performance. At the worst (lowest) forcing $f=10$ Hz, the bounce frequency ratio is $r=10/4=2.5$, giving transmissibility
$$T_R=\frac{1}{r^2-1}=\frac{1}{2.5^2-1}=\boxed{0.19},$$
i.e. only $\sim19\%$ of the blade excitation reaches the patient in bounce (less at higher forcing) — “disastrous bouncing” is avoided. Add the dampers (each spring‑damper element) sized for $\zeta\approx0.1$–$0.2$ to control the pass through resonance on start‑up/shut‑down.