Question 2 of 8: Hydro Turbine Model (Vanderkloof)
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper: 07-Mec-A6 Fluid Machinery — National Examinations, May 2015. Closed book, three hours. Section A (calculative, Q1–Q5) and Section B (descriptive, Q6–Q8); candidates answer four of A and two of B, but all eight are solved here as a study resource. Each question 10 marks.
Reference texts: S.L. Dixon & C.A. Hall, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Turbomachinery, 7th ed.; R.K. Turton, Principles of Turbomachinery, 2nd ed.; H. Cohen, G.F.C. Rogers & H.I.H. Saravanamuttoo, Gas Turbine Theory, 6th ed.; R.W. Fox, A.T. McDonald & P.J. Pritchard, Introduction to Fluid Mechanics, 8th ed.
Q1 (with Parts I and II interchanged), Q2 (Vanderkloof), Q4 (Curtis) and Q5 (Acacia/Port Rex) carry the same data; only Q3 (multi-jet Pelton) is unique. Q1 Part II additionally instructs the candidate to select a turbine efficiency, which is applied here.
Question 2: Hydro Turbine Model (Vanderkloof) (10 marks)
Given. Prototype and model runner data for a large Francis machine and its scale test rig.
Given data
Prototype output / speed
120 MW / 125 rev/min
Net head / flow
65 m / 200 m³/s
Prototype runner diameter
5.462 m
Model runner diameter / head
0.200 m / 10 m
Prototype electrical efficiency
98 %
Find. Specific speed, overall efficiency, model speed/flow/power, and the model hydraulic efficiency target.
Approach. Use the dimensionless power specific speed from the reference sheet, the affinity (similarity) laws to scale speed, flow and power to the model, then the full Moody equation to relate the two hydraulic efficiencies at different heads.
Specific speed. $\Omega_{sp}=\dfrac{\omega\,P^{1/2}}{\rho^{1/2}(gH)^{5/4}}$ with $\omega=2\pi(125)/60=13.09\ \text{rad/s}$ gives $\boxed{\Omega_{sp}=1.42}$ — a Francis machine.
Overall efficiency. $\eta_o=\dfrac{P}{\rho g Q H}=\dfrac{120\times10^{6}}{1000\cdot9.81\cdot200\cdot65}=0.941$.
Model speed. Equal head and flow coefficients give $N_m=N\dfrac{D_p}{D_m}\sqrt{\dfrac{H_m}{H_p}}=125\cdot\dfrac{5.462}{0.200}\sqrt{\dfrac{10}{65}}=1339\ \text{rev/min}$.
Model flow. $Q_m=Q\dfrac{N_m}{N}\left(\dfrac{D_m}{D_p}\right)^{3}=0.105\ \text{m}^3/\text{s}$.
Ideal model power. $P_m=\rho g Q_m H_m=1000\cdot9.81\cdot0.105\cdot10=10.3\ \text{kW}$.
Required model efficiency. The prototype hydraulic efficiency needed is $\eta_{P}=\eta_o/0.98=0.960$. The full Moody relation $\eta_P=1-(1-\eta_M)\left(\tfrac{D_m}{D_p}\right)^{1/4}\left(\tfrac{H_m}{H_p}\right)^{1/10}$ inverts to $\boxed{\eta_M=0.890}$.
The affinity laws hold because a homologous model runs at the same non-dimensional operating point; the Moody equation then corrects for the fact that a small model has proportionally larger boundary layers and therefore lower hydraulic efficiency. Because the model head (10 m) differs from the prototype (65 m), the full form is used; the approximate diameter-only form $\eta_M\approx1-(1-\eta_P)(D_p/D_m)^{1/5}$ gives about 92.3 % and is quoted for comparison only.