NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Mec-A6 Fluid Machinery · May 2015

Question 4 of 8: Curtis (Velocity-Compounded) Impulse Turbine

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper: 07-Mec-A6 Fluid Machinery — National Examinations, May 2015. Closed book, three hours. Section A (calculative, Q1–Q5) and Section B (descriptive, Q6–Q8); candidates answer four of A and two of B, but all eight are solved here as a study resource. Each question 10 marks.

Reference texts: S.L. Dixon & C.A. Hall, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Turbomachinery, 7th ed.; R.K. Turton, Principles of Turbomachinery, 2nd ed.; H. Cohen, G.F.C. Rogers & H.I.H. Saravanamuttoo, Gas Turbine Theory, 6th ed.; R.W. Fox, A.T. McDonald & P.J. Pritchard, Introduction to Fluid Mechanics, 8th ed.

Q1 (with Parts I and II interchanged), Q2 (Vanderkloof), Q4 (Curtis) and Q5 (Acacia/Port Rex) carry the same data; only Q3 (multi-jet Pelton) is unique. Q1 Part II additionally instructs the candidate to select a turbine efficiency, which is applied here.

Question 4: Curtis (Velocity-Compounded) Impulse Turbine (10 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. A two-row Curtis stage with a single set of nozzles feeding both moving rows.

Given data
Nozzle exit (steam) velocity, Vs11411 m/s
Nozzle angle20°
Bladessymmetrical, frictionless
Rows (velocity-compounded)2
Steam flow100 kg/s

Find. Optimum blade speed, all velocity-triangle quantities, work per stage, total power and blade efficiency.

Curtis stage — combined velocity diagrams, both moving rows (scale 1 m/s = 0.30 units)Row 1 — first moving rowVB = 331.5 m/sVs1 = 1411 m/s (20°)Vr1 = 1105 m/s (25.9°)Vr2 = 1105 m/s (25.9°)Vs2 = 820 m/s (36.1°)Row 2 — second moving row (after the symmetric fixed row)VB = 331.5 m/sVs3 = 820 m/s (36.1°)Vr3 = 585 m/s (55.5°)Vr4 = 585 m/s (55.5°)Vs4 = 483 m/s, axial — no exit whirl
Figure 3. Combined velocity diagrams for both moving rows of the Curtis stage, drawn to a common blade-velocity line VB = 331.5 m/s (suggested exam scale 7 mm = 10 m/s). The second row exhausts axially, which is the graphical statement that VB is the optimum blade speed.

Approach. For a velocity-compounded wheel with $n$ rows the optimum blade speed is $U=\tfrac{V_{s1}\cos\alpha}{2n}$; build symmetric, frictionless triangles row by row, then sum the Euler work.

  1. Optimum blade speed. With $n=2$, $U=\dfrac{V_{s1}\cos20^{\circ}}{2\cdot2}=\dfrac{1411\cdot0.9397}{4}=\boxed{331.5\ \text{m/s}}$.
  2. Row-1 inlet triangle. Whirl $V_{w1}=1411\cos20^{\circ}=1325.9$ and flow $V_{f}=1411\sin20^{\circ}=482.6\ \text{m/s}$ give $V_{r1}=\sqrt{(V_{w1}-V_B)^{2}+V_f^{2}}=1105\ \text{m/s}$ at $\beta_1=25.9^{\circ}$.
  3. Row-1 exit triangle. Symmetric frictionless blades keep $V_{r2}=V_{r1}=1105$ m/s at $\beta_2=\beta_1=25.9^{\circ}$ but reverse the relative whirl, so the absolute exit whirl is $V_B-V_{r2}\cos\beta_2=331.5-994.4=-662.9$ m/s (against the wheel) and $V_{s2}=\sqrt{662.9^{2}+482.6^{2}}=820.0\ \text{m/s}$ at $36.1^{\circ}$ to the wheel plane. Hence $w_1=V_B\,\Delta V_{w}=331.5(1325.9+662.9)=659.3\ \text{kJ/kg}$.
  4. Fixed row and row-2 triangles. The symmetric frictionless fixed blades return the flow at the same speed and angle but in the direction of rotation, $V_{s3}=820.0$ m/s at $36.1^{\circ}$, so $V_{r3}=\sqrt{(662.9-331.5)^{2}+482.6^{2}}=585.5\ \text{m/s}$ at $\beta_3=55.5^{\circ}$, and $V_{r4}=585.5$ m/s at $\beta_4=55.5^{\circ}$. The absolute exit whirl is $331.5-331.5\approx0$, so $V_{s4}=482.6$ m/s axial — zero exit whirl, which is exactly the minimum-exit-kinetic-energy condition asked for in (a). Row-2 work $w_2=331.5(662.9-0)=219.8\ \text{kJ/kg}$, the classic 3 : 1 split of a two-row Curtis stage.
  5. Total work and power. $w=w_1+w_2=879\ \text{kJ/kg}$; for 100 kg/s, $P=879\cdot100=87.9\ \text{MW}$.
  6. Blade efficiency. $\eta_b=\dfrac{w}{\tfrac12 V_{s1}^{2}}=0.883=\cos^{2}20^{\circ}$ — the exact ideal result.

The blade efficiency collapsing to $\cos^{2}\alpha$ is the elegant self-check of the ideal velocity-compounded stage: for symmetric frictionless blading at the optimum speed the whole two-row wheel converts exactly $\cos^{2}20^{\circ}=88.3\%$ of the jet kinetic energy to work, independent of the individual row angles. The 3 : 1 work split shows why Curtis staging is used only where a large single pressure drop must be absorbed at low rotational speed: the second row does far less work than the first.

(c) All steam velocities and blade angles (angles measured from the wheel plane)
StationAbsoluteRelativeBlade / nozzle angle
Row 1 inletVS1 = 1411 m/s @ 20°VR1 = 1105 m/sβ1 = 25.9°
Row 1 exitVS2 = 820.0 m/s @ 36.1° (counter-whirl)VR2 = 1105 m/sβ2 = 25.9°
Fixed row exit / Row 2 inletVS3 = 820.0 m/s @ 36.1°VR3 = 585.5 m/sβ3 = 55.5°
Row 2 exitVS4 = 482.6 m/s, axial (zero whirl)VR4 = 585.5 m/sβ4 = 55.5°
Axial (flow) velocity throughoutVf = 482.6 m/s; blade speed VB = 331.5 m/s
Question 4 results
QuantityValue
(a) Optimum blade speed331.5 m/s
(c) All velocities and anglessee table above (VR1=VR2=1105, VR3=VR4=585.5 m/s; β1,2=25.9°, β3,4=55.5°)
(d) Work stage 1 / stage 2659.3 / 219.8 kJ/kg
(e) Total power (100 kg/s)87.9 MW
(f) Blade efficiency88.3 %