22-Mec-B2 Environmental Control in Buildings · December 2013
Question 5 of 8: West window solar heat gain and the infiltration load expression
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. Professional Engineers of Ontario /
Engineers Canada annual examination 07-Mec-B2 Environmental Control in Buildings,
December 2013 — 3 hours, open book, non-communicating calculator permitted.
Eight problems of 20 points each; candidates answer any five.
ASHRAE psychrometric charts (SI and I-P) and an R-134a pressure–enthalpy diagram are
appended to the paper. All eight problems are solved below, because the set is
intended as a study resource.
Reference texts.
ASHRAE Handbook — Fundamentals (Ch. 1 Psychrometrics, Ch. 15 Fenestration,
Ch. 16 Ventilation and Infiltration, Ch. 18 Nonresidential Cooling and Heating Load Calculations,
Ch. 21 Duct Design);
McQuiston, Parker & Spitler, Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning: Analysis and
Design, 6th ed.;
Çengel & Boles, Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, 9th ed. (R-134a
property tables);
ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55 Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy;
ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1 Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality.
Canadian practice: National Energy Code of Canada for Buildings (NECB) and CSA F280 where a
Canadian code reference is required.
Check — table-derived coefficients. This is an
open-book paper whose cover page instructs candidates to “submit a clear statement of the
assumption(s)” made. Where a solution needs a value that is read from a handbook table or
chart rather than given in the question — shading coefficients, air-space thermal
resistances, curtain-wall leakage rates, surface-averaged wind pressure coefficients, window and
door U-factors, CO2 generation rates — the value used is stated explicitly at the
point of use with its source. The method, not the table entry, is what the marks follow; a
different edition of the table shifts the arithmetic but not the answer structure.
Question 5: West window solar heat gain and the infiltration load expression (20 points)
double: gray heat-absorbing outer + clear inner, 1.7 cm air space
Interior film coefficient
$h_i$
8 W/(m²·°C)
Outdoor / indoor air temperature
$t_o,\ t_i$
33 °C / 27 °C
ASHRAE clear-sky constants, July
$A,\ B,\ C$
1085 W/m², 0.207, 0.136
Solar declination, July 21
$\delta$
20.6°
Ground reflectance
$\rho_g$
0.20
Find. (a) The instantaneous heat gain through the glazing at that instant, comprising the
transmitted-plus-absorbed solar component and the conduction component driven by the 6 °C air-to-air
difference. (b) A general expression for the sensible and latent components of the infiltration load.
Figure 5.1 — Solar geometry at 18:00 solar time. The sun is 14.9° north of due west in plan and 14.4° above the horizon, giving an angle of incidence of 20.6° on the west glass — nearly normal, which is why a west window peaks so hard in late afternoon.
Approach. Get the solar altitude and wall-solar azimuth from the date, latitude and hour
angle; use the ASHRAE clear-sky model to build the direct, diffuse and ground-reflected irradiation on the
vertical west surface; multiply by the reference-glass solar heat gain factor and the shading coefficient
of the actual glazing; then add the conduction term from a series resistance calculation of the double
unit.
Solar geometry (part a). At 18:00 solar time the hour angle is
$H = 15(18 - 12) = 90\text{°}$. The altitude follows from
$$\sin\beta = \sin L \sin\delta + \cos L \cos\delta \cos H
= \sin 45\sin 20.6 + \cos 45 \cos 20.6 \cos 90 = 0.2488
\;\Rightarrow\; \beta = 14.4\text{°}$$
and the solar azimuth from
$$\cos\phi = \frac{\sin\beta \sin L - \sin\delta}{\cos\beta \cos L}
= \frac{(0.2488)(0.7071) - 0.3518}{(0.9686)(0.7071)} = -0.2568
\;\Rightarrow\; \phi = 104.9\text{° west of south}$$
For a west-facing wall ($\psi = 90\text{°}$) the wall-solar azimuth is
$\gamma = |\phi - \psi| = 14.9\text{°}$, so
$$\cos\theta = \cos\beta \cos\gamma = (0.9686)(0.9664) = 0.936
\;\Rightarrow\; \theta = 20.6\text{°}$$
Clear-sky irradiation on the window. The ASHRAE clear-sky model gives the direct
normal irradiation, and the vertical surface sees half the sky and half the ground:
$$G_{ND} = \frac{A}{e^{B/\sin\beta}} = \frac{1085}{e^{0.207/0.2488}} = 472\ \text{W/m}^2$$
$$G_D = G_{ND}\cos\theta = 442\ \text{W/m}^2,\qquad
G_d = C\,G_{ND}\,\frac{1+\cos\Sigma}{2} = 0.136(472)(0.5) = 32\ \text{W/m}^2$$
$$G_R = G_{ND}(C + \sin\beta)\,\rho_g\,\frac{1-\cos\Sigma}{2} = 472(0.136+0.2488)(0.2)(0.5)
= 18\ \text{W/m}^2$$
$$G_t = 442 + 32 + 18 = \boxed{492\ \text{W/m}^2}$$
Solar heat gain factor and the shading coefficient. The solar heat gain factor is
the gain through the ASHRAE reference (double-strength clear sheet) glass: its transmittance plus the
inward-flowing fraction of what it absorbs, about 0.87 of the incident total at this near-normal
incidence:
$$\text{SHGF} = 0.87\,G_t = 428\ \text{W/m}^2$$
For the actual unit — gray heat-absorbing outer sheet with a clear inner sheet — the ASHRAE
fenestration table gives a shading coefficient $\text{SC} = 0.55$. Hence
$$q_{\text{solar}} = A\,(\text{SC})(\text{SHGF}) = 2(0.55)(428) = \boxed{471\ \text{W}}$$
The heat-absorbing outer sheet is doing real work here: clear double glass ($\text{SC} \approx 0.87$)
would pass about 745 W.
Conduction through the glazing. Adding the resistances in series — outdoor
film (summer, 3.4 m/s, $h_o = 22.7$ W/(m²·K)), two 6 mm glass sheets
($k = 1.05$ W/(m·K)), the 1.7 cm vertical air space (ASHRAE, non-reflective surfaces,
$R = 0.170$ m²·K/W) and the given indoor film:
$$R_{\text{tot}} = \frac{1}{22.7} + 2\frac{0.006}{1.05} + 0.170 + \frac{1}{8}
= 0.044 + 0.011 + 0.170 + 0.125 = 0.350\ \text{m}^2\!\cdot\!\text{K/W}$$
$$U = \frac{1}{0.350} = 2.85\ \text{W/(m}^2\!\cdot\!\text{K)},\qquad
q_{\text{cond}} = UA(t_o - t_i) = 2.85(2)(33-27) = \boxed{34\ \text{W}}$$
Total instantaneous heat gain (part a).
$$q = q_{\text{solar}} + q_{\text{cond}} = 471 + 34 = \boxed{505\ \text{W}}$$
That is 253 W/m² of glass, of which 93% is solar. Note the distinction the question is testing:
this is the instantaneous heat gain, not the cooling load — the radiant part of it is first
absorbed by floor and furnishings and reappears as cooling load over the following hours, which is what
the cooling-load-factor method accounts for.
Sensible and latent infiltration load (part b). Infiltrating air must be brought
from outdoor to indoor conditions. Splitting the enthalpy change into a dry-bulb term and a moisture term,
for a volume flow $\dot V$ of outdoor air of density $\rho$:
$$q_{\text{sensible}} = \dot m\,c_p (t_o - t_i) = \rho\,\dot V\,c_p\,(t_o - t_i)$$
$$q_{\text{latent}} = \dot m\,h_{fg}(W_o - W_i) = \rho\,\dot V\,h_{fg}\,(W_o - W_i)$$
$$q_{\text{total}} = \rho\,\dot V\,(h_o - h_i)$$
Evaluated at standard air these collapse to the working forms used throughout HVAC design — in SI
with $\dot V$ in L/s, $q_s = 1.23\,\dot V\,\Delta t$ and $q_l = 3010\,\dot V\,\Delta W$ (both in W),
$q_t = 1.20\,\dot V\,\Delta h$; in I-P with $\dot V$ in cfm,
$q_s = 1.10\,\dot V\,\Delta t$ and $q_l = 4840\,\dot V\,\Delta W$ (both Btu/h),
$q_t = 4.5\,\dot V\,\Delta h$. The same expressions serve for mechanical ventilation air; only the
means of establishing $\dot V$ differs.
Check — handbook values used. SC = 0.55 for gray heat-absorbing outer / clear inner insulating glass, air-space resistance 0.170 m²·K/W for a 17 mm non-reflective vertical cavity, outdoor film $h_o$ = 22.7 W/(m²·K) for summer design, ground reflectance 0.20 and a reference-glass SHGC of 0.87 at 20.6° incidence are all ASHRAE table values, not data given in the question. Clear-sky (cloudless) conditions and no external or internal shading are assumed, as stated. Glass thickness is taken as 6 mm; the conduction term is only 7% of the answer, so this choice is not load-bearing.