22-Mec-B2 Environmental Control in Buildings · May 2013
Question 6 of 8: Mechanical-draught cooling tower — leaving water temperature and make-up (20 marks)
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. Professional Engineers of Ontario / EGBC
annual examination, 07-Mec-B2 (now 22-Mec-B2) Environmental Control in
Buildings, May 2013 sitting. Three hours, open book.
Eight problems of 20 points each; the candidate is instructed to solve
five and to nominate which five are to be graded. Psychrometric
charts and a pressure–enthalpy diagram for ammonia (R-717) are appended to
the paper, and candidates are expected to bring an environmental-control text
and steam tables. Instruction 1 invites the candidate to state any
interpretation assumptions with the answer — that latitude is used
explicitly below where the printed data are redundant.
All eight problems are worked here. Every
psychrometric state has been recomputed from the ASHRAE formulation for
saturation vapour pressure rather than scaled off a chart, so the numbers are
tighter than a graphical solution would be; chart-quality agreement (about
±0.2 K and ±0.0002 kg/kg) is all that an examiner expects.
Reference texts for this subject.
W. P. Jones, Air Conditioning Engineering, 5th ed., Butterworth-Heinemann — the standard reference for this examination code;
Ch. 2–3 (psychrometry), Ch. 6 (cooling loads), Ch. 10 (cooling towers),
Ch. 15 (duct design).
McQuiston, Parker & Spitler, Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning: Analysis and Design, 6th ed., Wiley — Ch. 3 (moist air), Ch. 8 (energy estimating and
degree-day methods), Ch. 12–13 (fluid flow and duct design).
ASHRAE Handbook – Fundamentals (2021) — Ch. 1 (psychrometrics), Ch. 21 (duct design),
Ch. 25–27 (heat, air and moisture transfer in the envelope).
Moran, Shapiro, Boettner & Bailey, Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, 9th ed., Wiley — Ch. 10 (vapour-compression and multistage
refrigeration).
ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55, Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human
Occupancy, and ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1, Ventilation for Acceptable
Indoor Air Quality.
Canadian frame: National Building Code of Canada 2020, National Energy
Code of Canada for Buildings 2020, and Environment and Climate Change Canada
Canadian Climate Normals for degree-day data.
Psychrometric relations used throughout. At barometric
pressure $p$, with saturation vapour pressure $p_{ws}(t)$ from the ASHRAE
correlation,
in SI (kJ per kg of dry air), and in the inch-pound system
$h = 0.240\,t + W\,(1061 + 0.444\,t)$ Btu per lb of dry air. The
thermodynamic wet-bulb temperature is obtained from the adiabatic-saturation
equation, which is what a chart's constant-wet-bulb lines represent.
Question 6: Mechanical-draught cooling tower — leaving water temperature and make-up (20 marks)
Given. A small mechanical-draught cooling tower operating at 1.013 bar throughout.
Given data
Quantity
Value
Water entering
5.5 L/s at 44 °C
Air volume flow drawn by the fan
9 m³/s at inlet conditions
Fan power absorbed
4.75 kW
Air entering
18 °C, 60% RH
Air leaving
saturated at 26 °C
Barometric pressure
1.013 bar
Find. the tower schematic, the temperature of the water leaving the tower, and the make-up water flow required per second.
The tower. Water is sprayed over the fill and falls counter-current to the air; the fan draws 9 m³/s through the pack and its 4.75 kW of shaft power ends up in the air stream. Make-up replaces exactly the water evaporated.
Approach. Fix both air states, convert the volumetric air flow to a dry-air mass flow through the humid specific volume at inlet, get the make-up from the water-vapour mass balance, then apply the steady-flow energy equation to the whole tower (including the fan work) to find the leaving water temperature.
Air entering, state 1. At 18 °C, $p_{ws} = 2.065$ kPa, so $p_w = 0.60(2.065) = 1.239$ kPa and $$W_1 = 0.6220\,\frac{1.239}{101.3 - 1.239} = 0.00770\ \text{kg/kg}, \qquad h_1 = 37.62\ \text{kJ/kg}$$ The inlet wet bulb is 13.4 °C, which is the thermodynamic floor for the leaving water temperature.
Air leaving, state 2. Saturated at 26 °C, $p_{ws} = 3.363$ kPa, so $$W_2 = 0.6220\,\frac{3.363}{101.3 - 3.363} = 0.02136\ \text{kg/kg}, \qquad h_2 = 80.60\ \text{kJ/kg}$$
Dry-air mass flow. The fan handles 9 m³/s of the entering mixture, whose specific volume per kilogram of dry air is $$v_1 = \frac{R_a T}{p - p_w} = \frac{0.287(291.15)}{101.3 - 1.239} = 0.8352\ \text{m}^{3}/\text{kg dry air}$$ so $$\dot{m}_a = \frac{9}{0.8352} = 10.78\ \text{kg/s}$$
Make-up water — the moisture balance. Everything the air picks up must be replaced: $$\dot{m}_{makeup} = \dot{m}_a\,(W_2 - W_1) = 10.776\,(0.02136 - 0.00770) = \boxed{0.147\ \text{kg/s}}$$ or 0.147 L/s — 2.7% of the circulating flow, which is the usual order for a tower with a 19 K range. The water leaving is therefore $5.5 - 0.147 = 5.353$ kg/s.
Energy balance on the whole tower. Taking liquid water enthalpy as $h_w = 4.187\,t$ from 0 °C, consistent with the datum built into the moist-air enthalpy, and counting the fan work as an input to the control volume, $$\dot{m}_{w1} h_{w1} + \dot{m}_a h_1 + \dot{W}_{fan} = \dot{m}_{w2} h_{w2} + \dot{m}_a h_2$$ The make-up is taken to enter at the leaving water temperature, so it does not appear separately. Substituting, $$5.5(4.187)(44) + 10.776(37.62) + 4.75 = \dot{m}_{w2} h_{w2} + 10.776(80.60)$$ $$1013.3 + 405.4 + 4.75 - 868.7 = 554.8\ \text{kW}$$
Leaving water temperature. $$t_{w2} = \frac{554.8}{5.353 \times 4.187} = \boxed{24.8^\circ\text{C}}$$ The range is $44 - 24.8 = 19.2$ K and the approach to the 13.4 °C entering wet bulb is 11.4 K — a wide approach, as expected of a small tower with a generous air-to-water mass ratio of $10.78/5.5 = 1.96$ and only a short fill depth.
Check the split of the heat rejected. The water gives up $1013.3 - 554.8 = 458.5$ kW while the air gains $10.776(80.60 - 37.62) = 463.2$ kW; the 4.75 kW difference is exactly the fan power, so the balance closes. Of the 463 kW carried away, the latent part $\dot{m}_a(W_2 - W_1)(2501) = 368$ kW is 79% — evaporation does nearly all of the work, which is why a tower can cool water below the ambient dry-bulb temperature.
Final results
Quantity
Result
Dry-air mass flow
10.78 kg/s
Air state leaving
26 °C saturated, $W = 0.02136$ kg/kg
Make-up (evaporation) rate
0.147 kg/s = 0.147 L/s
Water leaving the tower
5.353 kg/s at 24.8 °C
Cooling range
19.2 K
Approach to entering wet bulb (13.4 °C)
11.4 K
Heat rejected by the water
458 kW
Check: the litre-to-kilogram conversion is taken as 1 L = 1 kg. At 44 °C water is actually 990.6 kg/m³, so the true circulating mass flow is 5.45 kg/s; carrying that value through raises the leaving temperature by only 0.1 K, well inside chart-reading accuracy. The make-up is also assumed to enter at the basin temperature and blowdown is neglected, as the question gives no cycles of concentration; a real tower on Ottawa or Toronto make-up would bleed a further 0.5 to 1% to control dissolved solids.