NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Mec-B2 Environmental Control in Buildings · May 2013

Question 6 of 8: Mechanical-draught cooling tower — leaving water temperature and make-up (20 marks)

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. Professional Engineers of Ontario / EGBC annual examination, 07-Mec-B2 (now 22-Mec-B2) Environmental Control in Buildings, May 2013 sitting. Three hours, open book. Eight problems of 20 points each; the candidate is instructed to solve five and to nominate which five are to be graded. Psychrometric charts and a pressure–enthalpy diagram for ammonia (R-717) are appended to the paper, and candidates are expected to bring an environmental-control text and steam tables. Instruction 1 invites the candidate to state any interpretation assumptions with the answer — that latitude is used explicitly below where the printed data are redundant.

All eight problems are worked here. Every psychrometric state has been recomputed from the ASHRAE formulation for saturation vapour pressure rather than scaled off a chart, so the numbers are tighter than a graphical solution would be; chart-quality agreement (about ±0.2 K and ±0.0002 kg/kg) is all that an examiner expects.

Reference texts for this subject.

Psychrometric relations used throughout. At barometric pressure $p$, with saturation vapour pressure $p_{ws}(t)$ from the ASHRAE correlation,

$$W = 0.6220\,\frac{\phi\,p_{ws}(t)}{p - \phi\,p_{ws}(t)}, \qquad h = 1.006\,t + W\,(2501 + 1.86\,t)$$

in SI (kJ per kg of dry air), and in the inch-pound system $h = 0.240\,t + W\,(1061 + 0.444\,t)$ Btu per lb of dry air. The thermodynamic wet-bulb temperature is obtained from the adiabatic-saturation equation, which is what a chart's constant-wet-bulb lines represent.

Question 6: Mechanical-draught cooling tower — leaving water temperature and make-up (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. A small mechanical-draught cooling tower operating at 1.013 bar throughout.

Given data
QuantityValue
Water entering5.5 L/s at 44 °C
Air volume flow drawn by the fan9 m³/s at inlet conditions
Fan power absorbed4.75 kW
Air entering18 °C, 60% RH
Air leavingsaturated at 26 °C
Barometric pressure1.013 bar

Find. the tower schematic, the temperature of the water leaving the tower, and the make-up water flow required per second.

fill / packingfan9 m³/s air, 4.75 kW absorbedair out, saturated 26 °Cwater in5.5 L/s at 44 °Cair in18 °C, 60% RHbasincooled water out at 24.8 °Cmake-up0.147 kg/s
The tower. Water is sprayed over the fill and falls counter-current to the air; the fan draws 9 m³/s through the pack and its 4.75 kW of shaft power ends up in the air stream. Make-up replaces exactly the water evaporated.

Approach. Fix both air states, convert the volumetric air flow to a dry-air mass flow through the humid specific volume at inlet, get the make-up from the water-vapour mass balance, then apply the steady-flow energy equation to the whole tower (including the fan work) to find the leaving water temperature.

  1. Air entering, state 1. At 18 °C, $p_{ws} = 2.065$ kPa, so $p_w = 0.60(2.065) = 1.239$ kPa and $$W_1 = 0.6220\,\frac{1.239}{101.3 - 1.239} = 0.00770\ \text{kg/kg}, \qquad h_1 = 37.62\ \text{kJ/kg}$$ The inlet wet bulb is 13.4 °C, which is the thermodynamic floor for the leaving water temperature.
  2. Air leaving, state 2. Saturated at 26 °C, $p_{ws} = 3.363$ kPa, so $$W_2 = 0.6220\,\frac{3.363}{101.3 - 3.363} = 0.02136\ \text{kg/kg}, \qquad h_2 = 80.60\ \text{kJ/kg}$$
  3. Dry-air mass flow. The fan handles 9 m³/s of the entering mixture, whose specific volume per kilogram of dry air is $$v_1 = \frac{R_a T}{p - p_w} = \frac{0.287(291.15)}{101.3 - 1.239} = 0.8352\ \text{m}^{3}/\text{kg dry air}$$ so $$\dot{m}_a = \frac{9}{0.8352} = 10.78\ \text{kg/s}$$
  4. Make-up water — the moisture balance. Everything the air picks up must be replaced: $$\dot{m}_{makeup} = \dot{m}_a\,(W_2 - W_1) = 10.776\,(0.02136 - 0.00770) = \boxed{0.147\ \text{kg/s}}$$ or 0.147 L/s — 2.7% of the circulating flow, which is the usual order for a tower with a 19 K range. The water leaving is therefore $5.5 - 0.147 = 5.353$ kg/s.
  5. Energy balance on the whole tower. Taking liquid water enthalpy as $h_w = 4.187\,t$ from 0 °C, consistent with the datum built into the moist-air enthalpy, and counting the fan work as an input to the control volume, $$\dot{m}_{w1} h_{w1} + \dot{m}_a h_1 + \dot{W}_{fan} = \dot{m}_{w2} h_{w2} + \dot{m}_a h_2$$ The make-up is taken to enter at the leaving water temperature, so it does not appear separately. Substituting, $$5.5(4.187)(44) + 10.776(37.62) + 4.75 = \dot{m}_{w2} h_{w2} + 10.776(80.60)$$ $$1013.3 + 405.4 + 4.75 - 868.7 = 554.8\ \text{kW}$$
  6. Leaving water temperature. $$t_{w2} = \frac{554.8}{5.353 \times 4.187} = \boxed{24.8^\circ\text{C}}$$ The range is $44 - 24.8 = 19.2$ K and the approach to the 13.4 °C entering wet bulb is 11.4 K — a wide approach, as expected of a small tower with a generous air-to-water mass ratio of $10.78/5.5 = 1.96$ and only a short fill depth.
  7. Check the split of the heat rejected. The water gives up $1013.3 - 554.8 = 458.5$ kW while the air gains $10.776(80.60 - 37.62) = 463.2$ kW; the 4.75 kW difference is exactly the fan power, so the balance closes. Of the 463 kW carried away, the latent part $\dot{m}_a(W_2 - W_1)(2501) = 368$ kW is 79% — evaporation does nearly all of the work, which is why a tower can cool water below the ambient dry-bulb temperature.
Final results
QuantityResult
Dry-air mass flow10.78 kg/s
Air state leaving26 °C saturated, $W = 0.02136$ kg/kg
Make-up (evaporation) rate0.147 kg/s = 0.147 L/s
Water leaving the tower5.353 kg/s at 24.8 °C
Cooling range19.2 K
Approach to entering wet bulb (13.4 °C)11.4 K
Heat rejected by the water458 kW

Check: the litre-to-kilogram conversion is taken as 1 L = 1 kg. At 44 °C water is actually 990.6 kg/m³, so the true circulating mass flow is 5.45 kg/s; carrying that value through raises the leaving temperature by only 0.1 K, well inside chart-reading accuracy. The make-up is also assumed to enter at the basin temperature and blowdown is neglected, as the question gives no cycles of concentration; a real tower on Ottawa or Toronto make-up would bleed a further 0.5 to 1% to control dissolved solids.