22-Mec-B2 Environmental Control in Buildings · December 2019
Question 2 of 8: Induced-draft cooling tower — air flow at the fan and make-up water
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, December 2019 — 16-Mec-B2 Environmental
Control in Buildings. Three hours, open book: only textbooks and reference books are permitted
(no notes and no solved problems), any non-communicating calculator is allowed, and candidates are
expected to bring both an environmental-control text and steam tables because the tables and graphs
in those books are needed. Eight problems are printed at 20 points each and only the first
five in the exam book are graded, so the printed paper totals 160 points and a graded script
totals 100. Psychrometric charts (IP and SI) and an R-134a pressure–enthalpy diagram are
attached as the last three pages. All eight problems are worked below.
McQuiston, Parker & Spitler, Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning: Analysis and
Design, 6th ed. — plant psychrometry, duct design, infiltration and the degree-day method.
Jones, Air Conditioning Engineering, 5th ed. — percentage saturation, cooling-tower
analysis, apparatus dew point and coil by-pass factor.
Çengel & Ghajar, Heat and Mass Transfer, 6th ed., Ch. 3 —
one-dimensional composite walls and thermal bridging; Table A-5 for building-material
conductivities.
Stoecker & Jones, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning, 2nd ed. — vapour-compression
cycles and heat pumps; ASHRAE Refrigerant Tables for R-134a on the datum of the attached
chart (hf = sf = 0 at −40 °F).
Eastop & McConkey, Applied Thermodynamics for Engineering Technologists, 5th ed.
— the SI cooling-tower mass/energy balance in the form this paper uses.
Canadian context: ASHRAE Standard 170 Ventilation of Health Care
Facilities (adopted by CSA Z317.2 for Canadian hospitals); Health Canada
Residential Indoor Air Quality Guidelines; National Building Code of Canada 9.36 and the
National Energy Code of Canada for Buildings (NECB 2020); Environment and Climate Change Canada
Canadian Climate Normals for degree-day and design-temperature data.
Check — assumptions declared under cover-page instruction 1
Cover-page instruction 1 asks candidates to state any interpretive assumption with the answer.
Four are needed on this paper and each is flagged again where it is used: the operating-room
dry-bulb temperature in Problem 1 (not given — taken as
75 °F, the top of the ASHRAE 170 range, because it is the
only part of that range that also satisfies the 60 % relative-humidity ceiling); the
Winnipeg design conditions and degree-day base in Problem 6 (the paper says
“select the design conditions”); the indoor design temperature and neutral pressure
level in Problem 7(b); and the duct roughness and fitting allowance in
Problem 8. Everything else in the paper is fully determined by the data given.
Question 2: Induced-draft cooling tower — air flow at the fan and make-up water
(20 marks)
Make-up water temperature (added outside the tower)
tmu
10 °C
Total pressure throughout
p
1.01325 bar
Find. A flow sketch of the induced-draft tower, the volumetric air flow handled by
the fan at its outlet in m³/s, and the make-up water mass flow in kg/s.
Figure 2.1 — part (a): the induced-draft
tower. The fan is at the top, in the leaving air, which is what “induced draft” means and
which fixes the state at which the fan-outlet volume flow must be evaluated. The dashed boundary is the
control volume used for the balances below.
Approach. Two balances written across the dashed control volume close the problem:
conservation of water substance links the evaporation rate to the air's humidity gain, and conservation
of energy — with the fan work counted as an input — fixes the dry-air mass flow. The fan
volume flow then follows from the specific volume at the saturated exit state.
Part (a) — the flow sketch. Warm water at 46 °C is sprayed over the
fill; air is drawn in through the louvres at the base, rises counter-current to the falling water, and
is pulled out of the top by the fan; cooled water collects in the basin and returns to the process.
Because evaporation removes water from the circuit, make-up is admitted — here into the basin
piping outside the tower. Figure 2.1 is the answer to part (a).
Fix the entering air state, reading “50 % saturation” literally.
This paper family distinguishes percentage saturationμ = W/Wsat(t) from relative humidityφ = pw/pws, so
$$W_1 = \mu_1\,W_{sat}(15\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}) = 0.50 \times 0.010647
= \boxed{0.005324\ \text{kg/kg da}}$$
$$h_1 = 1.006\,t_1 + W_1\,(2501 + 1.86\,t_1) = 15.09 + 13.46 = 28.55\ \text{kJ/kg da}$$
For the record this state is 50.4 % relative humidity, so the distinction is worth 0.4 % here;
it is quoted so the marker can see the convention was chosen deliberately.
Fix the leaving air state at saturation.
$$W_2 = W_{sat}(25\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}) = 0.020081\ \text{kg/kg da},
\qquad h_2 = 25.15 + 51.16 = 76.31\ \text{kJ/kg da}$$
so each kilogram of dry air picks up
ΔW = 0.014757 kg of water and
Δh = 47.75 kJ of enthalpy on its way through.
Write the two balances. Water substance in equals water substance out:
$$\dot m_{w1} + \dot m_a W_1 = \dot m_{w2} + \dot m_a W_2
\quad\Longrightarrow\quad \dot m_{w2} = \dot m_{w1} - \dot m_a\,\Delta W$$
and energy in equals energy out, with the fan work added:
$$\dot m_a h_1 + \dot m_{w1} h_f(46) + \dot W_{fan} = \dot m_a h_2 + \dot m_{w2} h_f(25)$$
Substituting the mass balance into the energy balance eliminates
ṁw2.
Solve for the dry-air mass flow. With
hf(46) = 192.62 and
hf(25) = 104.83 kJ/kg from the steam tables,
$$\dot m_a = \frac{\dot m_{w1}\,[\,h_f(46) - h_f(25)\,] + \dot W_{fan}}
{(h_2 - h_1) - \Delta W\,h_f(25)}
= \frac{6(192.62 - 104.83) + 4}{47.75 - 0.014757 \times 104.83}$$
$$\dot m_a = \frac{530.7}{46.21} = \boxed{11.49\ \text{kg dry air/s}}$$
The numerator is the tower load: the water gives up
6 × 87.79 = 526.7 kW and the fan adds a further 4 kW, so
530.7 kW must leave in the air stream. The small correction in the denominator is the enthalpy the
evaporated water carries out with it as liquid at the cold-water temperature.
Part (c) — the make-up water. Make-up exactly replaces what evaporates:
$$\dot m_{mu} = \dot m_a\,\Delta W = 11.49 \times 0.014757
= \boxed{0.1695\ \text{kg/s}}$$
which is 610 litres per hour, or 2.8 % of the 6 kg/s circulating rate — a
thoroughly typical evaporation loss for a 21 K range. In service a further blowdown stream of the
same order is needed to hold the dissolved-solids concentration, so the real make-up demand would be
roughly double this figure.
Part (b) — the volumetric flow at the fan outlet. The fan is in the leaving
air, so its volume flow is evaluated at the saturated 25 °C state:
$$v_2 = \frac{0.287042\,T_2\,(1 + 1.6079\,W_2)}{p}
= \frac{0.287042 \times 298.15 \times 1.03228}{101.325} = 0.8719\ \text{m}^3/\text{kg da}$$
$$\dot V_2 = \dot m_a\,v_2 = 11.49 \times 0.8719 = \boxed{10.0\ \text{m}^3/\text{s}}$$
Strictly the fan itself raises the enthalpy by
4/11.49 = 0.348 kJ/kg, which at constant humidity ratio is
0.33 K of dry bulb and 0.11 % of volume — 10.02 m³/s. The paper states the
leaving air is 25 °C saturated, so that is the state used, and the fan rise is reported as
negligible rather than carried.
Check the result against the tower's own thermodynamics. The liquid-to-gas ratio
is L/G = 6/11.49 = 0.52, at the low end of the 0.5–1.5 band real
towers occupy, and the entering air wet bulb is 9.72 °C, so the cold water at 25 °C
sits 15.3 K above the entering wet bulb across a 21 K range. Both figures say the
same thing: this duty is easy for a tower, which is consistent with a modest air quantity. Substituting
all four state points back into the energy balance reproduces
1487.65 kW on each side, so the arithmetic closes exactly.
Check — a 0.35 K redundancy in the stated data
The paper puts the make-up in outside the tower, so the 5.83 kg/s of basin water at
25 °C is diluted by 0.170 kg/s at 10 °C and reaches the process at
24.65 °C, not the stated 25 °C. Holding the process inlet at exactly 25 °C
would need the tower to make 25.44 °C water, which the stated saturated-25 °C exit air
permits. The discrepancy shifts the air quantity by under 2 % and no part of the question needs
both readings, so the balances above are written on the states as printed and the redundancy is declared
here under cover-page instruction 1.