22-Mec-B2 Environmental Control in Buildings · Undated paper
Question 6 of 8: Equal-friction duct sizing
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, May 2019 — 16-Mec-B2 Environmental
Control in Buildings. Three hours, open book: any textbooks, references or notes may be used and
any non-communicating calculator is permitted, but computers, internet and smart phones are
prohibited. Candidates are told to bring both an environmental-control text and steam tables.
Eight problems are printed — Problem 1 is 30 points, Problem 2 is 10 points and
Problems 3 to 8 are 20 points each — and candidates solve five, indicating on the
cover of the first workbook which five are to be graded. Psychrometric charts and the refrigerant
pressure–enthalpy diagram are attached as the last three pages. Cover-page instruction 1 asks
for a clear statement of the assumption(s) wherever the interpretation is open, and several
problems below need one. All eight problems are worked here, because this set is a
study resource rather than a three-hour sitting.
McQuiston, Parker & Spitler, Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning: Analysis and
Design, 6th ed. — plant psychrometry, infiltration, duct design, solar heat gain and the
degree-day method.
Jones, Air Conditioning Engineering, 5th ed. — apparatus dew point, coil by-pass
factor, humidification.
Stoecker & Jones, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning, 2nd ed. — vapour-
compression cycle analysis and compressor volumetric efficiency.
Çengel & Boles, Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, 9th ed. —
R-134a property tables and steam tables.
Environment and Climate Change Canada, Canadian Climate Normals — Ottawa
heating degree-days; National Energy Code of Canada for Buildings (NECB) 2020 for the net-zero
discussion.
Check: every psychrometric state below is computed from the ASHRAE Ch. 1
formulations rather than read off the attached chart, and every mixing state is obtained from the
exact mass and energy balances (humidity ratio and enthalpy mass-weighted, dry bulb then
derived). Chart readings will differ in the last displayed digit; the physics does not.
Given. A five-section low-velocity system carrying 300 cfm total, with the three
terminal losses printed on the figure and 0.14 in. wg of total pressure at the plenum.
Section
Serves
Flow (cfm)
Length (ft)
A — plenum to J1
everything
300
20
B1 — riser off J1
diffuser 1 (0.05 in. wg)
80
12
B — J1 to J2
outlets 2 and 3
220
8
C — drop off J2
diffuser 3 (0.036 in. wg)
120
15
D — run-out off J2
grille 2 (0.04 in. wg)
100
8 + 15 = 23
Find. A round duct size for each of the five sections, and the balancing each run
then needs.
Approach. Identify the run with the least pressure per foot available — the
index run — set the design friction rate from it, size every section at that rate, round up to
commercially available diameters, and finish by checking each path against the 0.14 in. wg
budget.
Find the index run. Each run must fit its duct friction plus its terminal loss
inside 0.14 in. wg, so its allowable friction rate is $(0.14-\Delta p_{term})/L \times 100$:
$$\text{run 1 (A+B1)}:\ \frac{0.14-0.050}{32}(100)=0.281\ \text{in. wg/100 ft}$$
$$\text{run 2 (A+B+D)}:\ \frac{0.14-0.040}{51}(100)=0.196\ \text{in. wg/100 ft}$$
$$\text{run 3 (A+B+C)}:\ \frac{0.14-0.036}{43}(100)=0.242\ \text{in. wg/100 ft}$$
The smallest governs, so run 2 — the 100 cfm grille, longest at 51 ft — is the index run
and the design rate is
$$\boxed{\Delta p/L = 0.196\ \text{in. wg per 100 ft}}$$
Size at that rate. For each section the diameter is the one satisfying
$$\frac{\Delta p}{L}=\frac{f}{D}\cdot\frac{\rho V^2}{2g_c},\qquad
\frac{1}{\sqrt f}=-2\log_{10}\!\left(\frac{\varepsilon}{3.7D}+\frac{2.51}{Re\sqrt f}\right)$$
with standard air ($\rho = 0.075\ \text{lb/ft}^3$, $\nu = 1.57\times10^{-4}\ \text{ft}^2/\text{s}$)
and galvanised roughness $\varepsilon = 0.0003$ ft — which is precisely what the ASHRAE friction
chart plots. The calculated diameters are 7.57, 4.62, 6.74, 5.38 and 5.02 in.
Round up to available sizes. Round duct is made in whole-inch increments, and
rounding up keeps every section at or below the design rate:
$$A \to 8\ \text{in},\quad B_1 \to 5\ \text{in},\quad B \to 7\ \text{in},\quad
C \to 6\ \text{in},\quad D \to 6\ \text{in}$$
Velocities are then 859, 587, 823, 611 and 509 fpm — all comfortably inside the 1,000–1,200
fpm ceiling that keeps a low-pressure system quiet, so no size has to be increased for noise.
Section losses at the selected sizes. Recomputing the friction rate at the
rounded diameters:
$$A:\ 0.150 \Rightarrow 0.0299,\quad B_1:\ 0.134 \Rightarrow 0.0161,\quad B:\ 0.163 \Rightarrow 0.0130$$
$$C:\ 0.115 \Rightarrow 0.0172,\quad D:\ 0.082 \Rightarrow 0.0190\ \ \text{in. wg}$$
(rate in in. wg/100 ft, then the section loss over its own length).
Check each path against the budget.
$$\text{run 1}:\ 0.0299+0.0161+0.050=0.096\ \text{in. wg}$$
$$\text{run 2}:\ 0.0299+0.0130+0.0190+0.040=0.102\ \text{in. wg}$$
$$\text{run 3}:\ 0.0299+0.0130+0.0172+0.036=0.096\ \text{in. wg}$$
Every path fits inside 0.14 in. wg, and the index run has the largest demand as it should.
Balancing. Because each diameter was rounded up, all three runs finish with
surplus pressure: 0.044, 0.038 and 0.044 in. wg respectively. The system is therefore
self-balancing to within 0.006 in. wg — the runs are within 6 % of one another — and the
practical instruction is to fit a balancing damper in each branch and set them to absorb the surplus,
or, better, to reduce the plenum pressure to about 0.102 in. wg and save the fan energy. The
near-equality of the three surpluses is the equal-friction method working as intended.
Problem 6 — the duct network with the selected
round sizes. The index run is plenum → A → B → D → 100 cfm grille, 51 ft of duct
against 0.100 in. wg of available friction.
Section
Flow (cfm)
Length (ft)
Calculated $D$ (in)
Selected $D$ (in)
Velocity (fpm)
Loss (in. wg)
A
300
20
7.57
8
859
0.030
B1
80
12
4.62
5
587
0.016
B
220
8
6.74
7
823
0.013
C
120
15
5.38
6
611
0.017
D
100
23
5.02
6
509
0.019
Run
Duct + terminal loss (in. wg)
Surplus to be dampered (in. wg)
1 — 80 cfm diffuser
0.096
0.044
2 — 100 cfm grille (index)
0.102
0.038
3 — 120 cfm diffuser
0.096
0.044
Check: as the question asks, the assumptions are stated. Standard air at
0.075 lb/ft³; galvanised round duct, $\varepsilon = 0.0003$ ft, so the Colebrook–White
solution reproduces the ASHRAE friction chart to within reading accuracy. Dynamic losses at
the two tees and the two elbows are neglected, which is the usual first-pass treatment of the
equal-friction method; adding them as equivalent lengths (about 15 ft per branch take-off at these
sizes) would consume most of the surplus found in step 6 and would move sections A and D up one size.
The 8 ft rise on run D is counted as duct length. Duct sizes are restricted to whole inches, and
diameters are rounded up rather than to nearest so that no section exceeds the design friction
rate.