Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations,
December 2019 — 16-Mec-B3 Energy Conversion and Power Generation.
Three hours, closed book. Section A is calculative (Questions 1–5) and
Section B descriptive (Questions 6–8); candidates answer four from
Section A and two from Section B, six questions of ten marks each for a total
of sixty. Reference data are bound in as pages 11–16 and reference
formulae and constants as pages 17–20, with steam tables from
Thermodynamics and Heat Power supplied. All eight questions
are solved here, because the set is a study resource rather than a
sitting.
Reference texts.
Granet & Bluestein, Thermodynamics and Heat Power, 6th ed. —
steam tables, vapour cycles, gas cycles (the tables bound into this paper).
El-Wakil, Powerplant Technology — heat balance diagrams,
condensers, gas-turbine and combined plant, energy storage, environmental impact.
Lamarsh & Baratta, Introduction to Nuclear Engineering, 4th ed. —
fission rate, cross-sections, core heat generation and removal.
Çengel & Boles, Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, 9th ed. —
Rankine and regenerative Brayton cycles, isentropic efficiencies.
Çengel, Heat and Mass Transfer, 6th ed. — heat-exchanger
rating and off-design temperature profiles.
Check: steam and water properties below are taken from IAPWS-95 (the formulation the bound Granet & Bluestein tables tabulate); readings agree with those tables to better than 0.1 %, which is well inside the rounding the paper itself applies.
Reading the attachment. Page 15 is printed sideways. The diagram's own arithmetic closes: the HP mass balance closes exactly (4.06 + 0.50 + 0.11 + 0.96 + 0.83 + 385.22 + 38.43 = 430.11 kg/s), the IP mass balance closes exactly (11.49 + 24.54 + 13.36 + 340.39 = 389.78 = 385.72 + 4.06), and both printed mixing points reproduce themselves — (24.54×3228 + 0.96×3046)/25.50 = 3221 kJ/kg and (21.47×2585 + 0.76×3135)/22.23 = 2604 kJ/kg, both as printed.
Given. From the page-15 heat balance diagram (# = kg/s, h = kJ/kg, p = MPa, C = °C):
Stream
Flow (kg/s)
Enthalpy (kJ/kg)
Conditions
Main steam to HP turbine
430.11
3396
16.55 MPa, 538 °C
HP front-gland leak-off
0.50
3396
at main-steam conditions
HP inlet-end gland leak-off
0.11
3396
at main-steam conditions
HP bypass to the IP inlet
4.06
3396
at main-steam conditions
HP exhaust-end glands
0.96 and 0.83
3046
at HP exhaust conditions
Extraction A, off the cold reheat pipe
38.43
3046
to No. 1 HP heater
Cold reheat to reheater
385.22
3046
3.84 MPa
Hot reheat to IP turbine
385.72
3536
3.45 MPa, 538 °C
IP extraction B
11.49
3347
1.784 MPa
IP extraction C to the deaerator
24.54
3228
1.087 MPa
Steam to the boiler feed pump turbine
13.36
3228
IP exhaust conditions
Crossover to the LP turbines
340.39
3228
1.144 MPa
Final feedwater to the boiler
430.11
1071
3.647 MPa, 247 °C
Generator output
—
—
512.008 MW
Find. The overall cycle efficiency on heat input and electrical output, and the shaft power developed separately by the HP and the IP cylinders.
[Figure not reproduced: The two cylinders redrawn as control volumes. The leak-offs taken at the HP inlet never expand in that cylinder and must come off its working flow; extraction A is drawn from the cold reheat pipe downstream of the exhaust flange, so it has already done its full HP work and stays in. The exhaust-end . See the official exam paper.]
Approach. Take the heat input as the boiler duty plus the reheater duty, both from the flows and enthalpies on the drawing; then take each cylinder as a control volume and evaluate the shaft power as the net enthalpy flux across it, taking care to count only the steam that actually expands.
Part (a) — boiler duty. The boiler takes the whole final feedwater flow from 1071 kJ/kg to main-steam conditions: $$\dot{Q}_{boiler} = \dot{m}_{ms}(h_{ms} - h_{fw}) = 430.11 \times (3396 - 1071) = 1\,000\,006\ \text{kW} = 1000.0\ \text{MW}$$
Part (a) — reheater duty. The reheater is fed by the 385.22 kg/s of cold reheat at 3046 kJ/kg plus the 0.50 kg/s front-gland leak-off, which the drawing returns into the reheat line at main-steam enthalpy. Taking energy out minus energy in, $$\dot{Q}_{reheat} = \dot{m}_{hrh}h_{hrh} - (\dot{m}_{crh}h_{crh} + 0.50\,h_{ms}) = 385.72(3536) - [385.22(3046) + 0.50(3396)] = 188.83\ \text{MW}$$ Treating the reheater as a single 385.72 kg/s stream through 3046 → 3536 kJ/kg would give 189.00 MW — a difference of 0.02 % in the final answer, so the distinction is a matter of bookkeeping rigour rather than of arithmetic consequence.
Part (a) — overall efficiency. Total heat added to the cycle is 1000.01 + 188.83 = 1188.83 MW against a measured electrical output of 512.008 MW, so $$\eta_{cycle} = \frac{\dot{W}_{elec}}{\dot{Q}_{boiler} + \dot{Q}_{reheat}} = \frac{512.008}{1188.83} = \boxed{43.07\ \%}$$ This is a cycle efficiency on heat into the steam, not a station efficiency: at a typical 88 % boiler efficiency the plant would burn about 1351 MW of fuel for a net heat rate near 9500 kJ/kWh, which is right for a 512 MW subcritical reheat unit.
Part (b) — decide which steam actually works in the HP cylinder. Three streams leave at inlet conditions and therefore develop no work in this cylinder: the 4.06 kg/s bypass that is admitted to the IP inlet, and the 0.50 and 0.11 kg/s inlet-end gland leak-offs. Everything else expands from 3396 to 3046 kJ/kg — including extraction A, which is drawn from the cold reheat pipe downstream of the exhaust flange, and the two exhaust-end glands. Hence $\dot{m}_{HP} = 430.11 - 4.06 - 0.50 - 0.11 = 425.44$ kg/s.
Part (b) — HP turbine power. With a uniform enthalpy drop of $3396 - 3046 = 350$ kJ/kg, $$\dot{W}_{HP} = \dot{m}_{HP}(h_{ms} - h_{crh}) = 425.44 \times 350 = 148\,904\ \text{kW} = \boxed{148.9\ \text{MW}}$$ Deducting extraction A as well — the commonest slip on this drawing — would give 135.5 MW, understating the cylinder by 13.5 MW or 9 %.
Part (c) — the IP inlet is a mixture. The IP cylinder receives the 385.72 kg/s of hot reheat at 3536 kJ/kg and the 4.06 kg/s HP bypass at 3396 kJ/kg, so $\dot{m}_{IP} = 389.78$ kg/s at a mixed enthalpy of $(385.72 \times 3536 + 4.06 \times 3396)/389.78 = 3534.5$ kJ/kg. That total is confirmed exactly by the four printed outlet flows, $11.49 + 24.54 + 13.36 + 340.39 = 389.78$ kg/s — the closure that proves the bypass belongs at the IP inlet and nowhere else on the drawing.
Part (c) — IP turbine power as an energy balance. Because the cylinder has one extraction at a different enthalpy from the exhaust, the power is the net enthalpy flux rather than a single mass times a single drop: $$\dot{W}_{IP} = \left[\dot{m}_{hrh}h_{hrh} + \dot{m}_{byp}h_{ms}\right] - \left[\dot{m}_B h_B + (\dot{m}_C + \dot{m}_{BFPT} + \dot{m}_{cross})h_{IPex}\right]$$ Substituting, energy in is $385.72(3536) + 4.06(3396) = 1\,377\,694$ kW and energy out is $11.49(3347) + 378.29(3228) = 1\,259\,577$ kW, so $$\dot{W}_{IP} = 1\,377\,694 - 1\,259\,577 = 118\,117\ \text{kW} = \boxed{118.1\ \text{MW}}$$
Check the two answers against the machine. HP and IP together develop 148.9 + 118.1 = 267.0 MW, which is 52.2 % of the 512.008 MW at the generator terminals. The balance is produced by the two LP cylinders on the same shaft, expanding 340.39 kg/s from 3228 kJ/kg down to the 0.0034 MPa condenser — a proportion entirely typical of a single-reheat subcritical unit, where the LP end normally contributes just under half the output.