NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Mec-B3 Energy Conversion and Power Generation · December 2019

Question 7 of 8: System Load Demand

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Examinations, December 2019 — 16-Mec-B3 Energy Conversion and Power Generation. Three hours, closed book. Section A is calculative (Questions 1–5) and Section B descriptive (Questions 6–8); candidates answer four from Section A and two from Section B, six questions of ten marks each for a total of sixty. Reference data are bound in as pages 11–16 and reference formulae and constants as pages 17–20, with steam tables from Thermodynamics and Heat Power supplied. All eight questions are solved here, because the set is a study resource rather than a sitting.

Reference texts.

Check: steam and water properties below are taken from IAPWS-95 (the formulation the bound Granet & Bluestein tables tabulate); readings agree with those tables to better than 0.1 %, which is well inside the rounding the paper itself applies.

Question 7: System Load Demand (10 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Four sources, each 25 % of maximum system capacity, on an isolated system with no interconnection and no replenishable hydro. The page-16 load curve, read on the hour as a percentage of maximum system capacity:

Hour0369121518192124
Demand (% of capacity)60274066656582888370

The curve therefore has a minimum of 27 % at about 03:00, a broad daytime plateau near 65 %, and a sharp evening peak of 88 % at about 19:00. Its mean is 61.3 %, giving a daily load factor of 0.70.

Find. A dispatch for the four sources, hour by hour, that meets the curve, respects the capacity of each source and the closed pumped-storage energy balance, and can be defended on cost and on plant capability.

Assumptions stated (as Note 6 of the paper invites).

Approach. Fill the load curve from the bottom up in merit order, then size the pumping block so that the energy the reservoir returns over the evening peak is exactly the energy it absorbed overnight, multiplied by the round-trip efficiency.

  1. Lay nuclear flat across the whole day. The minimum demand is 27 %, which is above the nuclear unit's 25 % rating, so the unit never has to be backed off. It runs at full output for all 24 hours, contributing $25 \times 24 = 600$ capacity-hours — 41 % of the day's 1470 capacity-hours of demand — at a 100 % load factor. This is the correct home for the plant with the highest capital cost and the lowest fuel cost.
  2. Size the pumped storage from the peak it has to cover, not from the water available. With nuclear, coal and gas all at full output the system can supply 75 %, so hydro is needed only where demand exceeds 75 %: from 18:00 to 22:00, requiring 7, 13, 12, 8 and 2 % in successive hours, or 42 capacity-hours in total. Because the reservoir cannot be replenished, that energy must first have been pumped: $$E_{pump} = \frac{E_{gen}}{\eta_{rt}} = \frac{42}{0.75} = \boxed{56\ \text{capacity-hours}}$$
  3. Place the pumping load in the deepest part of the trough. Fifty-six capacity-hours over four hours is a pumping load of 14 % of system capacity, and 02:00 to 06:00 is where the curve is lowest. Adding it to the demand gives 49, 41, 41 and 45 % in those hours — all at or below the 50 % that nuclear and coal supply together, so the gas plant stays shut down all night and the pumping is done entirely with nuclear and coal energy. That is the whole point of the exercise: the store converts cheap night-time base-load energy into expensive evening peak energy.
  4. Run coal as high as the load allows. Coal now carries the demand between 25 % and 50 % of capacity, plus the pumping block. It sits at its full 25 % for eighteen hours of the day and dips only in the small hours — to a minimum of 15 % of system capacity, that is 60 % of its own rating, comfortably above minimum stable load. Its daily energy is 564 capacity-hours at a load factor of 0.94. Without the pumping block the same unit would have been driven down to 2 % of system capacity at 03:00, far below any coal-fired minimum, and would have had to be shut down and restarted.
  5. Give gas the residual. The gas plant fills whatever is left between 50 % and 75 %: it starts at about 07:00, follows the daytime plateau at 14–17 %, ramps to its full 25 % through the evening peak from 17:00 to 23:00, and shuts down overnight apart from a brief 10 % just after midnight. It supplies 320 capacity-hours at a load factor of 0.53 — the lowest utilisation of the four, which is exactly right for the plant with the lowest capital cost and the highest fuel cost.
  6. Confirm that the day balances. Generation less pumping must equal demand: $600 + 564 + 320 + 42 - 56 = 1470$ capacity-hours, which is the area under the load curve. The peak hour also fits: at 19:00 demand is 88 % and the dispatch is $25 + 25 + 25 + 13 = 88$ %, so 12 % of installed capacity remains unused as margin.
-2002040608010006121824Time of day (h)Output (% of maximum system capacity)Question 7 — daily dispatch of the isolated systemNuclear (base)Coal (mid-merit)Gas (load-follow / peak)Pumped hydro (generating)Pumped hydro (pumping)maximum system capacitydemandbelow the axis =pumping load
The shaded page-16 diagram. Each band is one source's output, stacked to the demand curve; the grey band below the axis is the pumping load, which is additional demand that nuclear and coal must also cover. The 56 capacity-hours pumped between 02:00 and 06:00 return 42 capacity-hours between 18:00 and 22:00 at 75 % round-trip efficiency, so the reservoir starts and ends the day at the same level.
SourceRoleOutput range (% of system capacity)Daily energy (capacity-hours)Load factor
NuclearBase load, never manoeuvred25 flat, 24 h6001.00
CoalMid-merit, held high by the pumping block15 – 255640.94
GasLoad-following and peaking0 – 253200.53
Pumped hydroPeak lopping, 18:00 – 22:000 – 13 generating; −14 pumping+42 out, −56 in—
SystemDemand met27 – 8814700.70

Reasoning behind the schedule. The order is set by the shape of each plant's cost and by what it is physically able to do. Nuclear has almost all of its cost in capital and almost none in fuel, so every hour it does not run is money already spent and wasted; it is also the plant least able to change output quickly, so it goes at the bottom and stays there. Coal sits next: its fuel is cheap enough to run most of the day but it is the plant that suffers most from cycling, so the pumping block is placed deliberately to keep it loaded overnight rather than to squeeze the last percentage point out of the merit order. Gas is the opposite of nuclear — cheap to build, expensive to run, quick to start — so it takes the variable duty and accepts a poor load factor. The pumped storage is not a generator at all but a broker: it moves 42 capacity-hours from the small hours to the evening, paying 14 capacity-hours of loss for the privilege, and it is worth doing because that same energy would otherwise have had to come from gas at several times the fuel cost, and because without it the coal unit would have to be cycled off every night.

The consequence of the isolation. Because there is no interconnection, the system carries its own reserve and its own regulation: the 12 % of capacity unused at the peak is the margin against a unit trip, and in practice the gas plant would be held part-loaded rather than at its ceiling so that it can pick up frequency. And because the reservoir is off-river, the storage account must balance every day — there is no inflow to draw on if the peak runs long, so the pumping has to be scheduled against the forecast peak with a margin, and a cold snap that stretches the evening peak beyond the stored 42 capacity-hours must be met by gas, not by the hydro.