22-Mec-B4 Integrated Manufacturing Systems · December 2013
Question 2 of 7: Control Limits for the Tabulated Data
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, December 2013 —
07-Mec-B4, Integrated Manufacturing Systems. Three hours; open book;
any non-communicating calculator permitted. Seven questions are printed and any
five constitute a complete paper, each of equal value (20 marks); only the
first five appearing in the answer book are marked. Several questions call for
an essay answer, where clarity and organisation carry marks. Note 1 of the
paper invites the candidate to state any assumption made where a question is
open to interpretation — that licence is used twice below and each use is
flagged. All seven questions are worked here, so the set can
serve as a complete study resource.
Reference texts. Chase, Jacobs & Aquilano,
Operations and Supply Chain Management (McGraw-Hill) — the source
of this paper's forecasting, line-balancing, cost and quality material;
Groover, Automation, Production Systems, and Computer-Integrated
Manufacturing (Pearson) for process planning, cellular manufacturing,
flexible manufacturing systems and plant networks; Montgomery,
Introduction to Statistical Quality Control (Wiley) for the Shewhart
chart constants and the normal-tail scrap calculations; Nahmias & Olsen,
Production and Operations Analysis (Waveland) for the forecasting
derivations; Kalpakjian & Schmid, Manufacturing Engineering and
Technology (Pearson) for the ring-rolling and tolerance context. Canadian
practice for the quality half of the paper follows CSA / ISO 9001 and
the ISO 7870 series on control charts, which tabulate the same constants
used below.
Question 2: Control Limits for the Tabulated Data (20 marks)
Given. Six subgroups of four measurements each, taken in
production order on one quality characteristic. The paper prints the readings
only, without naming the characteristic or its units, so they are carried
through as recorded.
Given data — six subgroups of size n = 4
Subgroup
x1
x2
x3
x4
1
0.55
0.60
0.57
0.55
2
0.59
0.55
0.60
0.58
3
0.55
0.50
0.55
0.51
4
0.54
0.57
0.50
0.50
5
0.58
0.58
0.60
0.56
6
0.60
0.61
0.55
0.61
Find. The upper and lower control limits for the
subgroup-average chart and for the subgroup-range chart, and a statement of
whether the process is in statistical control.
Approach. Because the data arrive as small rational subgroups
of a variable measurement, the appropriate pair is the Shewhart
x̄–R chart: estimate the process centre from the
grand average, estimate the within-subgroup spread from the average range, and
convert that spread into three-sigma limits using the tabulated constants for
n = 4.
Figure 2.1 — The subgroup-average and subgroup-range
charts constructed below. Every plotted point lies inside its control limits and
no run, trend or hugging pattern is present, so the process is in statistical
control over these six subgroups.
Compute each subgroup average and range. For subgroup
i,
$$\bar{x}_i=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{j=1}^{n}x_{ij},\qquad R_i=\max_j x_{ij}-\min_j x_{ij}$$
Applying these to the six rows, for example subgroup 1 gives
$\bar{x}_1=(0.55+0.60+0.57+0.55)/4=0.5675$ and
$R_1=0.60-0.55=0.05$:
Subgroup
1
2
3
4
5
6
Average x̄i
0.5675
0.5800
0.5275
0.5275
0.5800
0.5925
Range Ri
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.07
0.04
0.06
Average the subgroup statistics to locate the two centre lines.
With k = 6 subgroups,
$$\bar{\bar{x}}=\frac{1}{k}\sum_{i=1}^{k}\bar{x}_i=\frac{3.3750}{6}=0.5625,
\qquad \bar{R}=\frac{1}{k}\sum_{i=1}^{k}R_i=\frac{0.32}{6}=0.05333$$
These are the centre lines of the average chart and the range chart
respectively.
Read the Shewhart constants for the subgroup size. For
n = 4 the standard tables (Montgomery, Appendix VI; identical values
appear in ISO 7870-2) give
$$A_2=0.729,\qquad D_3=0,\qquad D_4=2.282,\qquad d_2=2.059$$
$A_2$ converts an average range into the three-sigma half-width of the mean,
$D_3$ and $D_4$ do the same job for the range, and $d_2$ converts an average
range into an estimate of the process standard deviation.
Construct the limits for the subgroup-average chart.
Substituting into $\mathrm{UCL}_{\bar{x}},\ \mathrm{LCL}_{\bar{x}}=\bar{\bar{x}}\pm A_2\bar{R}$,
the half-width is $A_2\bar{R}=0.729\times 0.05333=0.03888$, so
$$\boxed{\ \mathrm{UCL}_{\bar{x}}=0.5625+0.03888=0.6014,\qquad
\mathrm{CL}_{\bar{x}}=0.5625,\qquad
\mathrm{LCL}_{\bar{x}}=0.5625-0.03888=0.5236\ }$$
Construct the limits for the subgroup-range chart. The
range limits are pure multiples of the average range,
$\mathrm{UCL}_R=D_4\bar{R}$ and $\mathrm{LCL}_R=D_3\bar{R}$:
$$\boxed{\ \mathrm{UCL}_{R}=2.282\times 0.05333=0.1217,\qquad
\mathrm{CL}_{R}=0.05333,\qquad
\mathrm{LCL}_{R}=0\times 0.05333=0\ }$$
The lower range limit is zero for every subgroup size up to six, which is why a
range chart on small subgroups can never signal an improvement in spread; only
the upper limit is informative.
Test the data against the limits. The range chart is read
first, because the average chart borrows its limits from
$\bar{R}$ and is meaningless if the spread itself is unstable. The largest range
is $R_4=0.07$, comfortably below 0.1217, so the within-subgroup spread is stable.
The subgroup averages run from 0.5275 to 0.5925, and both extremes lie inside
the band $0.5236$ to $0.6014$. There is no run of seven on one side of the
centre line, no trend, and no pattern of points hugging the limits, so
the process is in statistical control and $\bar{R}$ is a valid
basis for the limits just computed.
Convert the average range into a process standard deviation and
natural tolerance. Now that control is established, the spread of
individual pieces follows from
$\hat{\sigma}=\bar{R}/d_2$:
$$\hat{\sigma}=\frac{0.05333}{2.059}=0.02590$$
so the natural tolerance of the process, the band inside which essentially all
individual items fall, is
$$\bar{\bar{x}}\pm 3\hat{\sigma}=0.5625\pm 0.0777\ \Rightarrow\ 0.4848\ \text{to}\ 0.6402$$
This is the number to compare against a drawing tolerance when the specification
is eventually supplied; the control limits themselves say nothing about
conformance.
Check: the paper prints the readings
without naming the characteristic, its units or a specification, and without
stating the sampling interval. The solution therefore reports control limits in
the units of the table and stops short of a capability statement, which would
require the specification. Six subgroups is also fewer than the twenty to
twenty-five normally recommended before limits are fixed, so these are correctly
described as trial control limits, to be recalculated once more
subgroups are available. Note 1 of the examination invites exactly this kind
of stated assumption.
Final results — trial control limits, n = 4, k = 6