NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Mec-B4 Integrated Manufacturing Systems · December 2013

Question 2 of 7: Control Limits for the Tabulated Data

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, December 2013 — 07-Mec-B4, Integrated Manufacturing Systems. Three hours; open book; any non-communicating calculator permitted. Seven questions are printed and any five constitute a complete paper, each of equal value (20 marks); only the first five appearing in the answer book are marked. Several questions call for an essay answer, where clarity and organisation carry marks. Note 1 of the paper invites the candidate to state any assumption made where a question is open to interpretation — that licence is used twice below and each use is flagged. All seven questions are worked here, so the set can serve as a complete study resource.

Reference texts. Chase, Jacobs & Aquilano, Operations and Supply Chain Management (McGraw-Hill) — the source of this paper's forecasting, line-balancing, cost and quality material; Groover, Automation, Production Systems, and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing (Pearson) for process planning, cellular manufacturing, flexible manufacturing systems and plant networks; Montgomery, Introduction to Statistical Quality Control (Wiley) for the Shewhart chart constants and the normal-tail scrap calculations; Nahmias & Olsen, Production and Operations Analysis (Waveland) for the forecasting derivations; Kalpakjian & Schmid, Manufacturing Engineering and Technology (Pearson) for the ring-rolling and tolerance context. Canadian practice for the quality half of the paper follows CSA / ISO 9001 and the ISO 7870 series on control charts, which tabulate the same constants used below.

Question 2: Control Limits for the Tabulated Data (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Six subgroups of four measurements each, taken in production order on one quality characteristic. The paper prints the readings only, without naming the characteristic or its units, so they are carried through as recorded.

Given data — six subgroups of size n = 4
Subgroupx1x2x3x4
10.550.600.570.55
20.590.550.600.58
30.550.500.550.51
40.540.570.500.50
50.580.580.600.56
60.600.610.550.61

Find. The upper and lower control limits for the subgroup-average chart and for the subgroup-range chart, and a statement of whether the process is in statistical control.

Approach. Because the data arrive as small rational subgroups of a variable measurement, the appropriate pair is the Shewhart x̄–R chart: estimate the process centre from the grand average, estimate the within-subgroup spread from the average range, and convert that spread into three-sigma limits using the tabulated constants for n = 4.

Subgroup-average chartUCL = 0.6014CL = 0.5625LCL = 0.5236123456Subgroup meanSubgroup numberSubgroup-range chartUCL = 0.1217CL = 0.0533LCL = 0.0000123456Subgroup rangeSubgroup number
Figure 2.1 — The subgroup-average and subgroup-range charts constructed below. Every plotted point lies inside its control limits and no run, trend or hugging pattern is present, so the process is in statistical control over these six subgroups.
  1. Compute each subgroup average and range. For subgroup i, $$\bar{x}_i=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{j=1}^{n}x_{ij},\qquad R_i=\max_j x_{ij}-\min_j x_{ij}$$ Applying these to the six rows, for example subgroup 1 gives $\bar{x}_1=(0.55+0.60+0.57+0.55)/4=0.5675$ and $R_1=0.60-0.55=0.05$:
    Subgroup123456
    Average x̄i0.56750.58000.52750.52750.58000.5925
    Range Ri0.050.050.050.070.040.06
  2. Average the subgroup statistics to locate the two centre lines. With k = 6 subgroups, $$\bar{\bar{x}}=\frac{1}{k}\sum_{i=1}^{k}\bar{x}_i=\frac{3.3750}{6}=0.5625, \qquad \bar{R}=\frac{1}{k}\sum_{i=1}^{k}R_i=\frac{0.32}{6}=0.05333$$ These are the centre lines of the average chart and the range chart respectively.
  3. Read the Shewhart constants for the subgroup size. For n = 4 the standard tables (Montgomery, Appendix VI; identical values appear in ISO 7870-2) give $$A_2=0.729,\qquad D_3=0,\qquad D_4=2.282,\qquad d_2=2.059$$ $A_2$ converts an average range into the three-sigma half-width of the mean, $D_3$ and $D_4$ do the same job for the range, and $d_2$ converts an average range into an estimate of the process standard deviation.
  4. Construct the limits for the subgroup-average chart. Substituting into $\mathrm{UCL}_{\bar{x}},\ \mathrm{LCL}_{\bar{x}}=\bar{\bar{x}}\pm A_2\bar{R}$, the half-width is $A_2\bar{R}=0.729\times 0.05333=0.03888$, so $$\boxed{\ \mathrm{UCL}_{\bar{x}}=0.5625+0.03888=0.6014,\qquad \mathrm{CL}_{\bar{x}}=0.5625,\qquad \mathrm{LCL}_{\bar{x}}=0.5625-0.03888=0.5236\ }$$
  5. Construct the limits for the subgroup-range chart. The range limits are pure multiples of the average range, $\mathrm{UCL}_R=D_4\bar{R}$ and $\mathrm{LCL}_R=D_3\bar{R}$: $$\boxed{\ \mathrm{UCL}_{R}=2.282\times 0.05333=0.1217,\qquad \mathrm{CL}_{R}=0.05333,\qquad \mathrm{LCL}_{R}=0\times 0.05333=0\ }$$ The lower range limit is zero for every subgroup size up to six, which is why a range chart on small subgroups can never signal an improvement in spread; only the upper limit is informative.
  6. Test the data against the limits. The range chart is read first, because the average chart borrows its limits from $\bar{R}$ and is meaningless if the spread itself is unstable. The largest range is $R_4=0.07$, comfortably below 0.1217, so the within-subgroup spread is stable. The subgroup averages run from 0.5275 to 0.5925, and both extremes lie inside the band $0.5236$ to $0.6014$. There is no run of seven on one side of the centre line, no trend, and no pattern of points hugging the limits, so the process is in statistical control and $\bar{R}$ is a valid basis for the limits just computed.
  7. Convert the average range into a process standard deviation and natural tolerance. Now that control is established, the spread of individual pieces follows from $\hat{\sigma}=\bar{R}/d_2$: $$\hat{\sigma}=\frac{0.05333}{2.059}=0.02590$$ so the natural tolerance of the process, the band inside which essentially all individual items fall, is $$\bar{\bar{x}}\pm 3\hat{\sigma}=0.5625\pm 0.0777\ \Rightarrow\ 0.4848\ \text{to}\ 0.6402$$ This is the number to compare against a drawing tolerance when the specification is eventually supplied; the control limits themselves say nothing about conformance.

Check: the paper prints the readings without naming the characteristic, its units or a specification, and without stating the sampling interval. The solution therefore reports control limits in the units of the table and stops short of a capability statement, which would require the specification. Six subgroups is also fewer than the twenty to twenty-five normally recommended before limits are fixed, so these are correctly described as trial control limits, to be recalculated once more subgroups are available. Note 1 of the examination invites exactly this kind of stated assumption.

Final results — trial control limits, n = 4, k = 6
QuantitySymbolValue
Grand averagex̄̄0.5625
Average rangeR̄0.05333
Upper control limit, averagesUCLx̄0.6014
Centre line, averagesCLx̄0.5625
Lower control limit, averagesLCLx̄0.5236
Upper control limit, rangesUCLR0.1217
Centre line, rangesCLR0.05333
Lower control limit, rangesLCLR0
Estimated process standard deviationσ̂ = R̄/d20.02590
Natural tolerance (x̄̄ ± 3σ̂)—0.4848 to 0.6402
State of control—In control (all points inside limits)