NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

23-Mechatronics-A5 Mechanical Design · December 2019

Question 10 of 10

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

16-Mex-A5 — Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines · National Exams, December 2019 · 3 hours, open book · Part A: Q1 compulsory, choose 3 of Q2–Q6; Part B: choose 1 of Q7/Q8. Every question is solved below for study purposes.

Reference texts: Norton, Design of Machinery (mechanism DOF, Grashof, velocity/acceleration analysis, cam design, balancing, gear trains); Wilson & Sadler, Kinematics and Dynamics of Machinery; Rao, Mechanical Vibrations (Q7–Q8).

Check: Several figures on this paper are hand-drawn, to-scale sketches with no printed dimensions (Q1a/b, Q2, Q3, Q6). Pin locations and link lengths were digitised directly from the printed figure and are reported. Absolute lengths for Q3 assume the stated "Scale 1:10" maps drawn millimetres to real millimetres (a labelling convention, not printed on the page); ratios and angular results (ω, α, Grashof class) do not depend on this assumption. The 8-gear train topology in Q6 (which planet meshes which sun/ring) is likewise read from the cross-section drawing; the specific combination adopted is the only one of the readings tried that gives a physically consistent (non locked) gear train.

Question 8 (Part B, 20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Bed+patient of mass $M_t$ and centroidal mass moment of inertia $I_G=0.2M_tL^2$, supported on two identical compressive springs (stiffness $k$ each) a distance $L/2=1\,\text{m}$ either side of $G$; disturbance frequencies at $\omega$ (10–20 Hz) and $4\omega$ (40–80 Hz).

Find. A spring stiffness $k$ (equal springs, symmetric placement, so bounce and pitch modes are decoupled) that isolates the bed from both disturbance bands, and the resulting static deflection.

bed + patient, Mₜ, Iᵎ G k₁k₂ L = 2 m Design target: ωn ≤ ωmin/3 ≈ 20.9 rad/s (3.33 Hz) so both ωn_bounce=3.33 Hz and ωn_pitch=3.73 Hz sit well below the 10-20 Hz band
Fig. 8 — symmetric two-spring mount: equal, symmetrically-placed springs decouple the vertical (bounce) and rotational (pitch) modes of the rigid bed.

Approach. With equal springs placed symmetrically about $G$, the bounce and pitch equations of motion decouple, giving two independent natural frequencies; size $k$ so that both natural frequencies sit well below the lowest disturbance frequency (10 Hz) — the standard vibration-isolation design rule — then verify the transmissibility at every disturbance frequency and report the resulting static deflection.

  1. Decoupled natural frequencies (equal springs $k$, symmetric at $\pm L/2$): $$\omega_{n,\text{bounce}} = \sqrt{\dfrac{2k}{M_t}}, \qquad \omega_{n,\text{pitch}} = \sqrt{\dfrac{2k(L/2)^2}{I_G}} = \sqrt{\dfrac{kL^2}{2\,I_G}} = \sqrt{\dfrac{k}{0.4\,M_t}} = \sqrt{2.5\,\dfrac{k}{M_t}}$$ so for this specific $I_G=0.2M_tL^2$, $\omega_{n,\text{pitch}}/\omega_{n,\text{bounce}} = \sqrt{2.5/2} = 1.118$ regardless of $k$ — the two modes always track together, 11.8% apart.
  2. Design target. Standard isolation practice keeps $\omega_n \le \omega_{\min}/3$ so that transmissibility stays comfortably below 1 across the whole operating band; with $\omega_{\min}=2\pi(10)=62.83\,\text{rad/s}$: $$\boxed{\omega_{n,\text{bounce}} \le 62.83/3 = 20.94\ \text{rad/s}\ (3.33\ \text{Hz})}$$
  3. Solve for the required stiffness per spring (per unit $M_t$): $$k = \dfrac{M_t\,\omega_{n,\text{bounce}}^2}{2} = \boxed{219.3\,M_t\ \ \text{N/m (each spring, }M_t\text{ in kg)}}$$ giving $\omega_{n,\text{bounce}}=20.94\,\text{rad/s}=3.33\,\text{Hz}$ and, from step 1, $\omega_{n,\text{pitch}}=23.42\,\text{rad/s}=3.73\,\text{Hz}$.
  4. Static deflection check (the requested design consideration): $\delta_{st}=M_tg/(2k)=g/\omega_{n,\text{bounce}}^2$: $$\boxed{\delta_{st} = 9.81/20.94^2 = 22.4\ \text{mm per spring}}$$ — a practical, achievable deflection for a compression spring mount (not so soft that the bed sways excessively under normal handling).
  5. Verify isolation (transmissibility, undamped) across the full disturbance range $TR=1/|1-(\omega/\omega_n)^2|$:
    Frequency$TR$ (bounce, $\omega_n{=}3.33$ Hz)$TR$ (pitch, $\omega_n{=}3.73$ Hz)
    10 Hz ($\omega_{\min}$)0.1250.161
    20 Hz ($\omega_{\max}$)0.0290.036
    40 Hz ($4\omega_{\min}$)0.0070.009
    80 Hz ($4\omega_{\max}$)0.0020.002
    Every combination of disturbance and mode gives $TR<0.16$ (at most 16% of the disturbance force is transmitted, worst case at $\omega_{\min}=10\,\text{Hz}$) — both bounce and pitch are safely isolated with no resonance risk anywhere in the 10–80 Hz range.
QuantityValue
Required stiffness per spring $k$$219.3\,M_t$ N/m
$\omega_{n,\text{bounce}}$20.94 rad/s = 3.33 Hz
$\omega_{n,\text{pitch}}$23.42 rad/s = 3.73 Hz
Static deflection per spring22.4 mm
Worst-case transmissibility (10 Hz, pitch)0.161
Check: $M_t$ is not given a numeric value in the source (only $L$ and $I_G/M_tL^2$ are supplied), so $k$ is reported as a coefficient times $M_t$; substitute the actual combined patient+bed mass to get a numeric spring rate. Equal, symmetric springs (decoupling bounce/pitch) is a design choice consistent with "give consideration to static deflection" — an asymmetric or unequal-stiffness mount would couple the two modes and complicate the isolation check without benefit here.
Back to the paper →