17-Phys-B2 Electro-Optical Engineering · December 2018
Question 6 of 7: LED Structures, Bandwidth, GaAs Output Characteristics and Photon-Counting Statistics
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 17-Phys-B2 Electro-Optical Engineering,
National Examination December 2018 — a three-hour closed-book examination (one
8.5×11 inch double-sided handwritten note sheet permitted). The cover page states any
five of the seven questions constitute a complete paper and only the first
five as they appear in the answer book are marked; every question is nonetheless answered in
full below so the paper remains a complete study resource.
Reference texts. G. Keiser, Optical Fiber Communications, 4th ed.
(fiber modes, dispersion and bend loss; laser-diode longitudinal modes and DFB gratings; PIN
photodiode responsivity, noise and receiver design; link power and dispersion budgets); B. E. A.
Saleh and M. C. Teich, Fundamentals of Photonics, 2nd ed. (semiconductor optical gain,
LED spontaneous-emission linewidth, avalanche-photodiode noise); A. Yariv, Quantum
Electronics / E. Hecht, Optics, 5th ed. (Mach–Zehnder interferometry and
electro-optic modulators).
Question 6: LED Structures, Bandwidth, GaAs Output Characteristics and Photon-Counting Statistics (20 marks)
Find. (a) LED types, (b) bandwidth-risetime relation and numeric bandwidth,
(c) $\lambda$, spectral FWHM, optical power, (d) $P(n<3\ \text{photons in 1 ns})$.
Approach. LED bandwidth is set by the spontaneous-recombination lifetime and
converts to a risetime via the usual $0.35/t_r$ rule; the GaAs bandgap fixes both $\lambda$ and
the thermal linewidth of spontaneous emission; the photon-counting question is a Poisson
statistics problem on the attenuated mean photon rate.
Part (a) — LED structure types.
Surface-emitting (Burrus-type) vs. edge-emitting LED structures.
The two basic LED geometries
are the surface-emitting (Burrus-type) LED, in which light is collected axially
through a small etched well in the substrate directly above (or below) the active region, and
the edge-emitting LED (ELED), in which a narrow active stripe waveguide guides
light to a cleaved facet on the side of the chip, much like a laser diode without mirrors.
Surface-emitting LEDs are simple to fabricate and couple reasonably well to large-core,
low-NA multimode fiber, but their broad, roughly Lambertian (isotropic) emission pattern wastes
most of the generated light. Edge-emitting LEDs produce a narrower, more directional beam (some
waveguiding along the stripe) that couples much more power into small-core or single-mode-class
fiber, at the cost of a more delicate, harder-to-align structure and lower total output
power.
Part (b) — bandwidth and recombination; numeric bandwidth. An LED's
optical output follows the excess minority-carrier population set up by spontaneous
recombination; the carrier density (and hence output power) responds to a step in drive current
with an exponential rise/fall governed by the spontaneous recombination lifetime
$\tau$, giving a single-pole electrical response
$P(f)\propto1/\sqrt{1+(2\pi f\tau)^2}$ — the faster carriers recombine, the wider the
modulation bandwidth. Using the standard risetime–bandwidth relation
$f_{3\text{dB}}\approx0.35/t_r$,
$$f_{3\text{dB}}=\frac{0.35}{12\times10^{-9}\ \text{s}}=\boxed{29.2\ \text{MHz}}.$$
Part (c) — GaAs LED wavelength, spectral width and power. The peak
photon energy tracks the bandgap, so
$$\lambda=\frac{hc}{E_g}=\frac{1239.84\ \text{eV}\cdot\text{nm}}{1.41\ \text{eV}}
=\boxed{879.3\ \text{nm}}.$$
Spontaneous emission has a thermal (Boltzmann) linewidth
$$\Delta\lambda_{\text{FWHM}}\approx\frac{1.45\,kT\lambda^2}{hc}
=\boxed{23.4\ \text{nm}},$$
about $1.45\,kT$ in energy (the classic $\sim1.8\,kT$ linewidth of a spontaneous-emission
lineshape reduces to this coefficient once converted to a wavelength FWHM). Taking the internal
quantum efficiency $\eta=18\%$ as also the (external) power efficiency and the injected
carrier rate $I/q$, the emitted optical power is
$$P_{\text{opt}}=\eta\,(h\nu/q)\,I=(0.18)(1.41\ \text{V})(15\ \text{mA})
=\boxed{3.81\ \text{mW}}.$$
Part (d) — photon-counting probability. After 40 dB of
attenuation the received power is
$$P_r=P\times10^{-40/10}=100\ \mu\text{W}\times10^{-4}=10.0\ \text{nW}.$$
At $0.85\ \mu\text{m}$ the photon energy is $h\nu=hc/\lambda\approx2.34\times10^{-19}\ \text{J}$,
so the mean number of photons arriving in a $1\ \text{ns}$ interval is
$$\bar{N}=\frac{P_r\,(1\ \text{ns})}{h\nu}=\boxed{42.79\ \text{photons}}.$$
Using the paper's own Poisson formula $P(n)=\bar{N}^n e^{-\bar N}/n!$,
$$P(n<3)=P(0)+P(1)+P(2)=e^{-\bar N}\left(1+\bar N+\frac{\bar N^2}{2}\right)
=\boxed{2.50e-16}.$$
With a mean of nearly 43 photons per nanosecond, the probability of receiving fewer than 3 is
vanishingly small — confirmation that the link is nowhere near being photon-starved at
this power/attenuation combination; a receiver failing here would be limited by electronic
(thermal/shot/dark-current) noise, not by photon-arrival statistics.