NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

17-Phys-B4 Signals and Communications · May 2014

Question 1 of 10: Sampling and Reconstruction of a sinc² Signal

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. 98-Phys-B4 Communications, National Examination May 2014 — a three-hour open-book examination (any non-communicating calculator permitted). The cover page states any five of the ten questions constitute a complete paper, with only the first five as they appear in the answer book marked; every question is nonetheless answered in full below so the paper remains a complete study resource. All ten questions carry equal value (20 marks each).

Reference texts. A. V. Oppenheim and A. S. Willsky, Signals and Systems, 2nd ed. (Fourier transform properties, the sampling theorem, LTI eigenfunctions, z-transforms); S. Haykin and M. Moher, Communication Systems, 5th ed. (AM/FM modulation, PCM, matched filtering and eye diagrams); B. P. Lathi and Z. Ding, Modern Digital and Analog Communication Systems, 4th ed. (FM Bessel spectra, M-ary baseband transmission); J. G. Proakis and D. G. Manolakis, Digital Signal Processing, 4th ed. (z-transform regions of convergence, partial-fraction inversion).

Question 1: Sampling and Reconstruction of a sinc² Signal (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. $x(t)=\text{sinc}^2(\pi t)$ multiplies a unit impulse train $s(t)$ of period $T_s=1/4$ s ($f_s=1/T_s=4$ Hz); the recovery filter $H(f)$ is an ideal lowpass filter of gain $A$ and cutoff $f_c$.

Find. (a) $X(f)$; (b) the Nyquist frequency of $x(t)$; (c) $X_s(f)$ for $|f|<10$ Hz; (d) $A$ and the range of $f_c$ for which $y(t)=x(t)$.

Approach. Match $x(t)$ against the Fourier-transform pair table entry $B\,\text{sinc}^2(\pi Bt)\leftrightarrow\Delta(f/2B)$, then apply the impulse-train sampling identity $X_s(f)=f_s\sum_n X(f-nf_s)$ and check whether the replicated triangles overlap, touch, or leave a guard band.

  1. Part (a) — spectrum X(f). Matching $x(t)=\text{sinc}^2(\pi t)$ to the table pair $B\,\text{sinc}^2(\pi Bt)\leftrightarrow\Delta(f/2B)$ with $B=1$ gives $$X(f)=\boxed{\Delta(f/2)}$$ Read the width from the paper's own definition of the triangular pulse: $\Delta(u)$ has peak 1 at $u=0$ and falls to zero at $u=\pm\tfrac12$, so $\Delta(f/2)$ reaches zero where $f/2=\pm\tfrac12$, i.e. at $$f=\pm1\ \text{Hz}.$$ $X(f)$ is therefore a triangular pulse of peak height 1 at $f=0$ falling linearly to zero at $f=\pm1$ Hz, and $x(t)$ is exactly bandlimited to $\boxed{W=1\ \text{Hz}}$ (equivalently: the table entry $B\,\text{sinc}^2(\pi Bt)\leftrightarrow\Delta(f/2B)$ has its null at $|f|=B$, and $B=1$ here). A direct numerical Fourier transform of $\text{sinc}^2(\pi t)$ confirms $X(0.5)=0.500$, $X(0.9)=0.100$ and $X(f)=0$ for $|f|\ge1$ Hz.
X(f): triangular spectrum of x(t)=sinc²(πt) -2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 f (Hz) X(f) 1 −W=−1 W=1
X(f)=Δ(f/2): a triangular pulse, peak 1 at f=0, zero at f=±1 Hz (since Δ(u) vanishes at u=±½) — x(t) is exactly bandlimited to W=1 Hz.
  1. Part (b) — Nyquist frequency. With bandwidth $W=1$ Hz, the Nyquist frequency (the minimum sampling rate that avoids aliasing, $2W$) is $$f_{Nyq}=2W=\boxed{2\ \text{Hz}}.$$
  2. Part (c) — X_s(f). The sampling frequency is $f_s=1/T_s=\boxed{4\ \text{Hz}}$, which is twice the Nyquist rate found in (b) ($f_s=2f_{Nyq}=4W$) — the signal is comfortably oversampled. Impulse-train sampling gives $$X_s(f)=f_s\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}X(f-nf_s)=4\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}\Delta\!\left(\frac{f-4n}{2}\right).$$ Each replica is a triangle of height $f_s=4$ and half-width $W=1$ Hz centred on a multiple of $f_s=4$ Hz, so the replicas are well separated: the baseband copy occupies $|f|\le1$ Hz, its nearest neighbours occupy $3\le|f|\le5$ Hz, and the intervals $1<|f|<3$ Hz are empty guard bands 2 Hz wide. Direct numerical summation of the shifted triangles confirms $X_s(f)=0$ throughout $1<|f|<3$ Hz — no overlap, hence no aliasing, and with frequency room to spare. For $|f|<10$ Hz this gives replicas of height $f_s=4$ centred at $f=-8,-4,0,4,8$ Hz.
X_s(f)=f_sΣX(f−nf_s), f_s=4 Hz, with recovery filter H(f) -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 0.0 4.0 f (Hz) guard band baseband replica (n=0), half-width W=1 Hz H(f): A=1/4, f_c anywhere in 1–3 Hz
X_s(f): well-separated triangular replicas of height f_s=4 and half-width W=1 Hz, centred every 4 Hz. Because f_s=4 Hz is twice the Nyquist rate, 2 Hz-wide guard bands (green) sit between the baseband copy and its images. The ideal LPF H(f) (red, drawn at f_c=2 Hz) recovers Y(f)=X(f) exactly for ANY cutoff in 1 Hz ≤ f_c ≤ 3 Hz, with gain A=1/f_s=1/4.
  1. Part (d) — filter gain and cutoff range. For $y(t)=x(t)$ we need $H(f)X_s(f)=X(f)$ over the baseband. Inside the baseband ($|f|\le1$ Hz) $X_s(f)=f_sX(f)$, so an ideal LPF of gain $A$ passing only the baseband must satisfy $A\,f_s=1$, i.e. $$A=\frac{1}{f_s}=\boxed{\frac14}.$$ The cutoff must be high enough to pass the whole baseband triangle and low enough to exclude the nearest image. The baseband copy ends at $W=1$ Hz and the first image begins at $f_s-W=3$ Hz, so any cutoff placed inside that guard band works: $$W\le f_c\le f_s-W\quad\Longrightarrow\quad\boxed{1\ \text{Hz}\le f_c\le3\ \text{Hz}.}$$ Any $f_c<1$ Hz clips part of the baseband triangle's own tail, and any $f_c>3$ Hz admits part of the image centred at $f=4$ Hz. Because $f_s=4W$ here rather than the bare minimum $2W$, this is a genuine 2 Hz-wide interval of admissible cutoffs, not a single point.
Final results
QuantityValue
$X(f)$$\Delta(f/2)$ — triangular, peak 1, zero at $\pm1$ Hz ($W=1$ Hz)
Nyquist frequency $f_{Nyq}$2 Hz
Sampling rate $f_s$4 Hz (= $2f_{Nyq}$, oversampled by a factor of 2)
$X_s(f)$, $|f|<10$ Hztriangles of height 4 and half-width 1 Hz, centred at $0,\pm4,\pm8$ Hz, with empty guard bands over $1<|f|<3$ Hz
Filter gain $A$$1/4$
Cutoff range for $y(t)=x(t)$$1\ \text{Hz}\le f_c\le3\ \text{Hz}$
Check
The whole question turns on reading the width of $\Delta(f/2)$ correctly. The paper's own definition (page 12) puts $\Delta(t/\tau)$'s zeros at $t=\pm\tau/2$, so $\Delta(f/2)$ is zero at $|f|=1$ Hz — NOT at $|f|=2$ Hz. Taking the null at $\pm2$ Hz would give $W=2$, $f_{Nyq}=4$, and the degenerate conclusion that $f_c$ has only one admissible value, which contradicts the question's own wording ("determine … the allowable range for $f_c$"). A direct numerical FT of $\text{sinc}^2(\pi t)$ settles it: $X(0.9)=0.100$ and $X(f)=0$ for $|f|\ge1$ Hz.
← Paper overview