Question 4 of 10: FM Spectrum — Reading Modulation Index from a Bessel-Line Plot
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 98-Phys-B4 Communications, National Examination
May 2014 — a three-hour open-book examination (any non-communicating calculator
permitted). The cover page states any five of the ten questions constitute a
complete paper, with only the first five as they appear in the answer book marked; every
question is nonetheless answered in full below so the paper remains a complete study resource.
All ten questions carry equal value (20 marks each).
Reference texts. A. V. Oppenheim and A. S. Willsky, Signals and
Systems, 2nd ed. (Fourier transform properties, the sampling theorem, LTI eigenfunctions,
z-transforms); S. Haykin and M. Moher, Communication Systems, 5th ed. (AM/FM
modulation, PCM, matched filtering and eye diagrams); B. P. Lathi and Z. Ding, Modern
Digital and Analog Communication Systems, 4th ed. (FM Bessel spectra, M-ary baseband
transmission); J. G. Proakis and D. G. Manolakis, Digital Signal Processing, 4th ed.
(z-transform regions of convergence, partial-fraction inversion).
Question 4: FM Spectrum — Reading Modulation Index from a Bessel-Line Plot (20 marks)
Given. $A_c=100$ V; the printed one-sided spectrum $|\Phi_{FM}(f)|$ has
7 lines at 497–503 kHz, magnitudes 1, 5.5, 22, 38.5, 22, 5.5, 1; a table/plot of
$J_n(\beta)$ is provided on the paper.
Find. (a) $\Delta f_{peak}$, $f_m$, $f_c$; (b) $K_f$ for $A_m=2.0$ V;
(c) the rescaled spectrum for $A_m=4.0$ V, $f_m\to2f_m$.
Approach. The line spacing gives $f_m$ directly and the tallest line gives
$f_c$; because the plot shows only $f\ge0$, each printed line height equals
$(A_c/2)|J_n(\beta)|$ (half the two-sided coefficient, from splitting $\cos$ into
$e^{\pm}$-exponentials) — match these against the provided Bessel table to read off
$\beta$.
Part (a) — Δf_peak, f_m, f_c. Adjacent lines are spaced
$(503-497)/6=1$ kHz apart, so $f_m=\boxed{1\ \text{kHz}}$. The tallest (centre) line sits at
$f=500$ kHz, so $f_c=\boxed{500\ \text{kHz}}$. Reading each line as
$(A_c/2)|J_n(\beta)|=50|J_n(\beta)|$ for $n=0,1,2,3$ and comparing against $50\,J_n(1.0)$ from
the provided Bessel table ($J_0(1)=0.77,J_1(1)=0.44,J_2(1)=0.11,J_3(1)=0.02$) gives
$50\times(0.77,0.44,0.11,0.02)=(38.5,22.0,5.5,1.0)$ — an exact match to the four printed
amplitudes, so
$$\beta=\boxed{1.0}.$$
The peak frequency deviation follows from $\beta=\Delta f_{peak}/f_m$:
$$\Delta f_{peak}=\beta f_m=\boxed{1\ \text{kHz}}.$$
Part (b) — K_f. For single-tone FM, $\Delta f_{peak}=K_fA_m$, so
$\beta=K_fA_m/f_m$. With $A_m=2.0$ V,
$$K_f=\frac{\beta f_m}{A_m}=\frac{1\ \text{kHz}}{2.0\ \text{V}}=\boxed{500\ \text{Hz/V}}.$$
Part (c) — rescaled spectrum. With $A_m'=4.0$ V (doubled) and
$f_m'=2f_m=2$ kHz (doubled), the new peak deviation is
$\Delta f_{peak}'=K_fA_m'=500\times4.0=2000$ Hz, so the new modulation index is
$$\beta'=\frac{\Delta f_{peak}'}{f_m'}=\frac{2000}{2000}=\boxed{1.0}\ \text{(UNCHANGED)}.$$
Because $\beta$ is the same, the Bessel envelope — and hence every line's amplitude
$(A_c/2)J_n(\beta)$ — is identical to part (a). Only the LINE SPACING changes: sidebands
now sit at $f_c\pm2,4,6$ kHz instead of $f_c\pm1,2,3$ kHz.
Same Bessel envelope (β=1.0 unchanged since Δf and f_m both doubled) but LINE SPACING doubles to 2 kHz — sidebands now at f_c±2,4,6 kHz instead of ±1,2,3 kHz.