Question 8 of 10: Regions of Convergence, Causality/Stability, and Inversion of a Rational z-Transform
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 98-Phys-B4 Communications, National Examination
May 2014 — a three-hour open-book examination (any non-communicating calculator
permitted). The cover page states any five of the ten questions constitute a
complete paper, with only the first five as they appear in the answer book marked; every
question is nonetheless answered in full below so the paper remains a complete study resource.
All ten questions carry equal value (20 marks each).
Reference texts. A. V. Oppenheim and A. S. Willsky, Signals and
Systems, 2nd ed. (Fourier transform properties, the sampling theorem, LTI eigenfunctions,
z-transforms); S. Haykin and M. Moher, Communication Systems, 5th ed. (AM/FM
modulation, PCM, matched filtering and eye diagrams); B. P. Lathi and Z. Ding, Modern
Digital and Analog Communication Systems, 4th ed. (FM Bessel spectra, M-ary baseband
transmission); J. G. Proakis and D. G. Manolakis, Digital Signal Processing, 4th ed.
(z-transform regions of convergence, partial-fraction inversion).
Question 8: Regions of Convergence, Causality/Stability, and Inversion of a Rational z-Transform (20 marks)
Given. $H(z)=\dfrac{z(z-1)}{(z-0.5)(z-2)}$, with zeros at $z=0,1$ and poles
at $z=0.5,2$.
Find. (a) all valid ROCs; (b) causality/stability of each; (c) $h[n]$ for
each ROC; (d) the difference equation.
Approach. Since there are two poles, three annular ROCs are possible
(interior of the inner pole, the annulus between them, exterior of the outer pole). Causality
follows from whether the ROC is the exterior of the outermost pole; stability follows from
whether the ROC contains the unit circle $|z|=1$. Partial-fraction $H(z)$ and read $h[n]$ off
each term via the standard $a^nu[n]\leftrightarrow1/(1-az^{-1})$ (right-sided) and
$-a^nu[-n-1]\leftrightarrow1/(1-az^{-1})$ (left-sided) pairs, matched to the chosen ROC.
Part (a) — possible ROCs. The two poles at $z=0.5$ and $z=2$ split
the $z$-plane into three annular regions:
$$\boxed{\text{(i) } |z|<0.5,\quad\text{(ii) } 0.5<|z|<2,\quad\text{(iii) } |z|>2.}$$
Pole-zero plot: poles at z=0.5 and z=2 (zeros at z=0, z=1). Three annular ROCs are possible: |z|<0.5 (anticausal, unstable), 0.5<|z|<2 (stable, two-sided/non-causal — the only ROC containing the unit circle), |z|>2 (causal, unstable).
Part (b) — causality and stability per ROC. Causality requires the
ROC to be the EXTERIOR of the outermost pole; stability requires the ROC to CONTAIN the unit
circle $|z|=1$:
(i) $|z|<0.5$: interior of the inner pole — the sequence is purely left-sided
(anticausal); the region excludes $|z|=1$ (since $0.5<1$), so
unstable.
(ii) $0.5<|z|<2$: an annulus — the sequence is two-sided
(non-causal); this is the ONLY one of the three regions that contains
$|z|=1$, so it is the unique stable choice.
(iii) $|z|>2$: exterior of the outer pole — the sequence is right-sided
(causal); the region excludes $|z|=1$ (since $2>1$), so
unstable.
No ROC is simultaneously causal AND stable here, because that would require every pole strictly
inside the unit circle, and $z=2$ is not.
Part (c) — impulse response per ROC. Polynomial division plus
partial fractions give
$$H(z)=1+\frac{1/6}{z-0.5}+\frac{4/3}{z-2}=1+\frac{(1/6)z^{-1}}{1-0.5z^{-1}}+\frac{(4/3)z^{-1}}{1-2z^{-1}}$$
(: $H(z)$ minus this expansion simplifies to exactly
0). Applying $z^{-1}/(1-az^{-1})\leftrightarrow a^{n-1}u[n-1]$ (right-sided, ROC $|z|>|a|$) or
$\leftrightarrow-a^{n-1}u[-n]$ (left-sided, ROC $|z|<|a|$) to each term, matched to the chosen
ROC:
$$\text{(i) } |z|<0.5:\quad h[n]=\boxed{\delta[n]-\tfrac16(0.5)^{n-1}u[-n]-\tfrac43(2)^{n-1}u[-n]}$$
$$\text{(ii) } 0.5<|z|<2:\quad h[n]=\boxed{\delta[n]+\tfrac16(0.5)^{n-1}u[n-1]-\tfrac43(2)^{n-1}u[-n]}$$
$$\text{(iii) } |z|>2:\quad h[n]=\boxed{\delta[n]+\tfrac16(0.5)^{n-1}u[n-1]+\tfrac43(2)^{n-1}u[n-1]}$$
Each sequence's own causality/stability confirms part (b) directly: in (i) both geometric
pieces run over $n\le0$ (left-sided, anticausal) and the $2^{n-1}$ piece grows without bound as
$n\to-\infty$ (unstable, since $\sum|h[n]|$ diverges); in (ii) the $0.5^{n-1}$ piece is
right-sided and decaying while the $2^{n-1}$ piece is left-sided and decaying as $n\to-\infty$
— both halves are absolutely summable, so $\sum_n|h[n]|<\infty$; in (iii) both pieces are right-sided (causal) but the
$2^{n-1}$ piece grows without bound as $n\to+\infty$ (unstable).
Part (d) — difference equation. Cross-multiplying
$H(z)=Y(z)/X(z)$: $(z-0.5)(z-2)Y(z)=z(z-1)X(z)$, i.e.
$(z^2-2.5z+1)Y(z)=(z^2-z)X(z)$. Dividing by $z^2$ (delay form):
$$(1-2.5z^{-1}+z^{-2})Y(z)=(1-z^{-1})X(z)\ \Longrightarrow\
\boxed{y[n]=2.5y[n-1]-y[n-2]+x[n]-x[n-1]}$$
This equation is the SAME for all three ROCs — the ROC only selects which particular
sequence (which set of initial/boundary conditions) realizes it, not the recursion itself
(confirmed: recursively evaluating this equation for a unit-impulse input reproduces the
causal $h[n]$ of part (iii) exactly for the first 15 samples).