NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

07-Str-A1 · May 2016

Question 6 of 8: Frame Analysis by Slope Deflection

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, May 2016 — 07-Str-A1 Elementary Structural Analysis, 3 hours, CLOSED BOOK (an approved Sharp or Casio calculator is permitted). Six questions constitute a complete paper: Questions 1–5 are compulsory and one only of Questions 6, 7 or 8 is attempted, for 100 marks (6 + 18 + 15 + 18 + 21 + 22). Marks are shown in the left margin. All eight questions are worked below, because the three alternatives exercise three different methods — slope deflection, virtual work and three-hinged-frame statics — and the complete set is the more useful study resource.

Every structure on this paper is defined by a hand-drawn figure and nothing else: the printed text gives the task, the drawing gives the geometry, the loads and the support types.

Sign conventions used throughout. Shear force is positive when the resultant of the forces to the left of a section acts upwards; bending moment is positive when it sags the member (tension on the underside), and sagging ordinates are plotted above the axis in every diagram. Truss member forces are quoted as T for tension and C for compression. In the slope-deflection work of Question 6 the member-end moments follow the usual convention, clockwise on the member end taken as positive.

Reference texts.

Question 6: Frame Analysis by Slope Deflection (22 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

QuantityValue
Overhang 1–2$1\ \text{m}$, carrying $16.5\ \text{kN}$ at node 1
Beam 2–3$8\ \text{m}$, uniform load $w = 12\ \text{kN}/\text{m}$
Beam 3–4$4\ \text{m}$, node 4 fixed
Column 2–5$4\ \text{m}$, base 5 pinned
Column 3–6$4\ \text{m}$, base 6 fixed
Flexural rigidity$EI$ the same for every member; all members inextensible

Find. The shear force and bending moment diagrams for every member, with the maximum and minimum ordinates labelled.

Approach. Slope deflection. Because the members are inextensible and node 4 is fixed, nodes 2 and 3 cannot translate horizontally, and the inextensible columns stop them translating vertically, so there is no sidesway and the only unknowns are the joint rotations $\theta_2$ and $\theta_3$. Write the end moments, impose moment equilibrium at those two joints, solve the two-by-two system, then recover shears from member free bodies.

  1. Establish that there is no sidesway and count the unknowns. The beam 1–2–3–4 is inextensible and node 4 is built in, so nodes 2 and 3 are fixed horizontally; the columns are inextensible and their bases are on the ground, so nodes 2 and 3 are fixed vertically. The kinematic unknowns are therefore just $\theta_2$ and $\theta_3$ — a two-equation problem despite five degrees of static indeterminacy.
  2. Deal with the overhang first. The 1 m cantilever is statically determinate and applies a known moment at joint 2: $$M_{21} = 16.5\,(1) = 16.5\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$ It has no rotational stiffness, so it must be entered as a fixed applied moment at the joint and never given a share of the balancing moment.
  3. Write the slope-deflection equations. With $\mathrm{FEM}_{23} = -wL^2/12 = -64$ and $\mathrm{FEM}_{32} = +64\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$, and using the modified form $3EI\theta/L$ for the pin-based column 2–5, $$\begin{aligned} M_{23} &= \tfrac{2EI}{8}\left(2\theta_2 + \theta_3\right) - 64, & M_{32} &= \tfrac{2EI}{8}\left(2\theta_3 + \theta_2\right) + 64\\ M_{34} &= \tfrac{2EI}{4}\left(2\theta_3\right), & M_{43} &= \tfrac{2EI}{4}\left(\theta_3\right)\\ M_{25} &= \tfrac{3EI}{4}\,\theta_2, & M_{36} &= \tfrac{2EI}{4}\left(2\theta_3\right) \end{aligned}$$ with $M_{52} = 0$ at the pin and $M_{63} = \tfrac{2EI}{4}\theta_3$.
  4. Impose joint equilibrium. Writing $a = EI\theta_2$ and $b = EI\theta_3$, the two joint equations $M_{21} + M_{23} + M_{25} = 0$ and $M_{32} + M_{34} + M_{36} = 0$ become $$\begin{aligned} 1.25\,a + 0.25\,b &= 47.5\\ 0.25\,a + 2.50\,b &= -64 \end{aligned}$$ $$\boxed{EI\theta_2 = 44.0,\qquad EI\theta_3 = -30.0\ \ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}^2}$$ The clean values are a good sign that the fixed-end moments and the overhang sign are right.
  5. Back-substitute for the member end moments. $$\begin{aligned} M_{23} &= -49.5, & M_{32} &= +60.0\\ M_{34} &= -30.0, & M_{43} &= -15.0\\ M_{25} &= +33.0, & M_{52} &= 0\\ M_{36} &= -30.0, & M_{63} &= -15.0 \end{aligned}$$ all in $\text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$. Checking the joints, $16.5 - 49.5 + 33.0 = 0$ at node 2 and $60.0 - 30.0 - 30.0 = 0$ at node 3.
  6. Convert to bending moments and find the beam shears. In beam terms the moment at node 2 is $-49.5$ and at node 3 is $-60.0$ $\text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$, both hogging. Free-body equilibrium of member 2–3 gives the end shears $$V_2 = \frac{M_3 - M_2 + wL^2/2}{L} = \frac{-60 + 49.5 + 384}{8} = +46.6875\ \text{kN}$$ $$V_3 = V_2 - wL = 46.6875 - 96 = -49.3125\ \text{kN}$$ The shear passes through zero at $x = 46.6875/12 = 3.8906\ \text{m}$ from node 2, where the sagging peak is $$M_{\max} = -49.5 + 46.6875(3.8906) - 6(3.8906)^2 = +41.322\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$
  7. Finish the remaining members. Beam 3–4 carries no load, so its moment runs linearly from $-30.0$ at node 3 to $+15.0$ at node 4 and its shear is constant at $(15 + 30)/4 = +11.25\ \text{kN}$. Column 2–5 carries $33.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$ at the head and zero at the pin, so its shear is $33.0/4 = 8.25\ \text{kN}$; column 3–6 carries $30.0$ at the head and $15.0$ at the base with the ends bending in opposite senses, so its shear is $(30 + 15)/4 = 11.25\ \text{kN}$ and its point of contraflexure sits $2.667\ \text{m}$ below node 3.
  8. Extract the reactions and check global equilibrium. The jumps in the beam shear give the vertical reactions $$\begin{aligned} R_5 &= 46.6875 - (-16.5) = 63.1875\ \text{kN}\ \uparrow\\ R_6 &= 11.25 - (-49.3125) = 60.5625\ \text{kN}\ \uparrow\\ R_4 &= -11.25\ \text{kN}\ \ (\text{i.e. }11.25\ \text{kN downward}) \end{aligned}$$ and $63.1875 + 60.5625 - 11.25 = 112.5\ \text{kN}$, exactly the applied total $16.5 + 96$. Horizontally the two column shears, 8.25 kN and 11.25 kN, are balanced by a 3.0 kN reaction at the built-in end 4, and the fixing moment there is the $15.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$ already found.
Q6 — frame geometry and loading12 kN/m16.5 kN1234561 m8 m4 m4 m
Q6. Base 5 is a pin, base 6 and end 4 are fully fixed. The frame is five times statically indeterminate but only twice kinematically indeterminate, which is what makes slope deflection so economical here.
Q6 — shear force diagram, member by member (kN)member 1-2-16.5member 2-3-49.312+46.688member 3-4+11.25column 2-5-8.25column 3-6+11.25shear force, kN
Q6 shear. Each member is developed on its own axis. The two column ordinates are the horizontal shears carried by those columns; the sign convention within a column is local to it.
Q6 — bending moment diagram, member by member (kN·m)member 1-2-16.5member 2-3-60-49.5member 3-4-30+15column 2-5+33column 3-6-30+15bending moment, kN.m
Q6 moment. Sagging is plotted above the axis. The peak sagging moment of +41.322 kN·m occurs 3.891 m from node 2, and the largest hogging moment of −60.0 kN·m sits over node 3.
MemberShear ordinatesMoment ordinates
1–2 (overhang)$-16.5\ \text{kN}$ throughout$0 \to -16.5\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$
2–3 (loaded span)max $+46.6875$, min $-49.3125\ \text{kN}$$-49.5$ at 2, peak $+41.322$ at $x = 3.891\ \text{m}$, $-60.0$ at 3
3–4$+11.25\ \text{kN}$ throughout$-30.0$ at 3, $+15.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$ at 4
Column 2–5$8.25\ \text{kN}$ throughout$33.0$ at the head, $0$ at the pinned base
Column 3–6$11.25\ \text{kN}$ throughout$30.0$ at the head, $15.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$ at the fixed base
Reactions$R_5 = 63.1875$, $R_6 = 60.5625$, $R_4 = -11.25\ \text{kN}$fixing moment at 4 $= 15.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$