Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exam 04-BS-11, Properties of Materials — December 2015. 3 hours,
closed-book examination (approved Casio or Sharp calculator only). Candidates attempt five,
and only five, questions for a full paper: two from Section A, two from Section B, and the
fifth from either section. All eight questions are solved below for completeness.
Given. $L_0=2.00$ in, $d_0=0.505$ in (standard 0.505-in tensile
coupon, $A_0=0.2003$ in$^2$); $d_f=0.423$ in after failure; the four load/gauge-length
pairs in the table above.
Find. Yield strength $\sigma_y$, tensile strength (UTS), modulus of elasticity
$E$, %reduction of area, %elongation.
Fig. Q3 — engineering stress-strain curve constructed from the four
given data points.
Approach
Each row converts directly to one engineering-stress/engineering-strain point via
$\sigma=P/A_0$ (constant, undeformed area) and $e=(L-L_0)/L_0$. The first row is explicitly
labelled all-elastic, so it alone defines $E$; the second row is explicitly labelled the first
point of plastic deformation, so it is taken as the yield point; the third (maximum load) row
gives the tensile strength; %RA uses the separately-given post-fracture diameter, and %EL uses
the fourth row's post-fracture gauge length.
Modulus of elasticity, from the elastic row. At $P=2000$ lb,
$L=2.001$ in:
$$\sigma=\frac{2000}{0.2003}=9985\ \text{psi},\qquad
e=\frac{2.001-2.000}{2.000}=0.0005,$$
$$E=\frac{\sigma}{e}=\frac{9985}{0.0005}=\boxed{1.997\times10^{7}\ \text{psi}\ (\approx138\ \text{GPa})}.$$
Yield strength, from the first plastic row. At $P=6000$ lb (the table
labels this row's deformation "all plastic," i.e. the specimen has just yielded by this load):
$$\sigma_y=\frac{6000}{0.2003}=\boxed{29{,}960\ \text{psi}\ (\approx206\ \text{MPa})}.$$
Tensile strength, from the maximum-load row.
$$\text{UTS}=\frac{P_{\max}}{A_0}=\frac{8500}{0.2003}=\boxed{42{,}440\ \text{psi}\ (\approx293\ \text{MPa})}.$$
%Reduction of area, from the post-fracture diameter. With
$A_f=\tfrac{\pi}{4}(0.423)^2=0.1405$ in$^2$:
$$\%RA=\frac{A_0-A_f}{A_0}\times100=\frac{0.2003-0.1405}{0.2003}\times100=\boxed{29.8\%}.$$
%Elongation, from the post-fracture gauge length. The load has already
dropped to 7800 lb by the moment of fracture (necking reduces the load-bearing area faster
than the material's remaining work-hardening capacity can compensate); the paired gauge length
2.450 in is given as the final, "after failure" measurement, so it is used directly
(the table gives no separate under-load reading to correct for elastic springback here):
$$\%EL=\frac{L_f-L_0}{L_0}\times100=\frac{2.450-2.000}{2.000}\times100=\boxed{22.5\%}.$$