Question 4 of 8: Ti BCC→HCP Volume Change; the Charpy Impact Test
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exam 04-BS-11, Properties of Materials — December 2015. 3 hours,
closed-book examination (approved Casio or Sharp calculator only). Candidates attempt five,
and only five, questions for a full paper: two from Section A, two from Section B, and the
fifth from either section. All eight questions are solved below for completeness.
Find. (a) %volume change on cooling through the transus. (b) Description of
the Charpy test and its relation/advantages relative to a tensile test.
Approach
The number of atoms is conserved across the transformation but the two unit cells contain a
different number of atoms (2 for BCC vs. 6 for HCP), so unit-cell volumes cannot be compared
directly — the fair comparison is volume per atom in each structure.
Volume per atom, BCC.
$$V_{cell,bcc}=a_{bcc}^3=(0.332)^3=0.03659\ \text{nm}^3,\qquad
v_{bcc}=\frac{V_{cell,bcc}}{2}=0.018297\ \text{nm}^3/\text{atom}.$$
Volume per atom, HCP. The hexagonal cell volume is
$V=\left(\tfrac{3\sqrt3}{2}\right)a^2c$:
$$V_{cell,hcp}=\left(\frac{3\sqrt3}{2}\right)(0.2978)^2(0.4735)=0.10909\ \text{nm}^3,\qquad
v_{hcp}=\frac{V_{cell,hcp}}{6}=0.018182\ \text{nm}^3/\text{atom}.$$
Percent volume change.
$$\%\Delta V=\frac{v_{hcp}-v_{bcc}}{v_{bcc}}\times100
=\frac{0.018182-0.018297}{0.018297}\times100$$
$$\boxed{\%\Delta V\approx-0.62\%}$$
— a small contraction on cooling through 882°C (the low-temperature HCP
$\alpha$-phase packs marginally more efficiently than the high-temperature BCC $\beta$-phase),
consistent with titanium's well-documented small negative transformation volume change.
(b) The Charpy impact test. A notched bar specimen (standard V-notch or
keyhole-notch geometry) is struck by a swinging pendulum hammer released from a fixed height;
the pendulum's rise on the far side after fracturing the specimen is converted to the
energy absorbed in fracture (read directly off the test machine's calibrated
scale). Testing a series of identical specimens over a range of temperatures produces the
characteristic ductile-to-brittle transition curve for BCC metals (a sharp drop
in absorbed energy over a fairly narrow temperature band) — the single most important piece
of information the test provides, since it identifies the lowest safe service temperature for a
structure.
Relation to the tensile stress-strain curve, and the impact test's advantages.
There is no direct, general quantitative relation between Charpy energy and the
tensile stress-strain curve (e.g. Charpy energy is not simply the tensile toughness, the area
under $\sigma$-$\varepsilon$, measured a different way) — the two tests load the material in
fundamentally different ways: tensile testing applies a slow, uniaxial, unnotched load, while
Charpy applies a load at very high strain rate to a sharply notched specimen, producing a
triaxial stress state at the notch root. That difference is precisely the test's value: high
strain rate and a sharp notch both promote brittle behaviour, so the Charpy test reveals a
material's susceptibility to brittle, low-energy fracture under impact/shock loading and locates
the ductile-brittle transition temperature — information a slow, unnotched tensile test
cannot provide at all, even though the tensile test gives more precise quantitative strength and
ductility numbers under the conditions it does test.