NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

23-Chem-A5 Chemical Plant Design and Economics · December 2014

Question 3 of 6: Depreciation

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — December 2014 — 04-Chem-A5 Chemical Plant Design and Economics. Three-hour, closed-book exam; any non-communicating calculator permitted. Six equally weighted (20-mark) questions are posed and the candidate answers any five; only the first five are marked. All six are answered below for completeness. Question 1 is a conceptual process-design question answered with a flow sheet and organised prose; questions 2, 3 and 4 mix a short essay with numerical work (turnover-ratio pricing, sinking-fund depreciation, and simple/compound loan interest); question 5 combines profitability and risk discussion with a return-and-payout calculation; question 6 is a safety, optimization and environmental essay.

Reference texts: M.S. Peters, K.D. Timmerhaus & R.E. West, Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers (5th ed., McGraw-Hill) — the exam's named primary text (cost estimation Ch. 6, interest and investment Ch. 7, depreciation Ch. 9, profitability and payout Ch. 10, optimum design Ch. 11, plant safety and loss prevention); R. Turton et al., Analysis, Synthesis, and Design of Chemical Processes (4th ed., Prentice Hall) — flowsheet synthesis and process development; T.M. Duncan & J.A. Reimer, Chemical Engineering Design and Analysis (Cambridge, 1998) — the source of the boiling-point data used in Question 1; supporting Canadian tax practice from the Canada Revenue Agency Capital Cost Allowance classes and the half-year rule, and environmental practice from the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) and provincial air-quality regulation.

Question 3: Depreciation (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

(a) Two methods of computing depreciation — pros and cons

Straight-line (SL) method. The depreciable value is written off in equal annual amounts, $d=(V_0-V_s)/n$, so the book value falls linearly. Advantages: simple, transparent, easy to audit, and the constant charge smooths reported earnings. Disadvantages: it ignores the time value of money, and it poorly matches reality for assets that lose most of their worth early or become obsolete before their nominal life ends.

Declining-balance (DB) method. A fixed fraction $f$ of the remaining book value is charged each year, $d_k=f\,V_{k-1}$, giving large early charges that taper off — an accelerated method. Advantages: better matches the true early loss of value of most process equipment, and, by front-loading the deduction, defers income tax and improves early cash flow — the basis of the Canadian Capital Cost Allowance (CCA) system, with its prescribed class rates and "half-year rule". Disadvantages: more complex, never reaches zero on its own (a salvage floor or a switch to straight-line must be imposed), and the heavy early write-off depresses early book profit.

(Two further recognised methods are the accelerated sum-of-the-years-digits scheme and the sinking-fund method used in part (b), which is the slowest write-off because the accumulating fund earns interest.)

(b) Sinking-fund annual charge to match the straight-line book value

Given. Original cost $V_0=\$20{,}000$; sinking-fund interest rate $i=4\%=0.04$; the target is that the book value at $n=8$ years equal the value it would have under straight-line depreciation at $\$2000$/yr.

Find. The uniform annual sinking-fund depreciation charge (deposit) $R$.

Approach. First fix the target: the straight-line book value at year 8 sets how much depreciation must have accumulated by then. In the sinking-fund method that accumulated depreciation is the future worth of a uniform annual deposit $R$ earning 4 %, so equate the two and solve for $R$.

  1. Target accumulated depreciation from the straight-line reference. Straight-line at $\$2000$/yr for 8 years gives book value $$V_{8,\text{SL}} = V_0 - 8(\$2000) = \$20{,}000 - \$16{,}000 = \$4000$$ so the depreciation that must have accumulated by year 8 is $D_8 = V_0-V_{8,\text{SL}} = \boxed{\$16{,}000}$.
  2. Equate to the sinking-fund accumulation. In the sinking-fund method the fund built by a level year-end deposit $R$ over 8 years at $i=4\%$ is the uniform-series compound-amount, and it must equal $D_8$: $$R\,\frac{(1+i)^{n}-1}{i} = D_8 \qquad\Rightarrow\qquad R = D_8\,\frac{i}{(1+i)^{n}-1}$$
  3. Evaluate. With $(1.04)^{8}=1.36857$, the series factor is $\dfrac{1.36857-1}{0.04}=9.2142$, so $$R = \$16{,}000\times\frac{0.04}{(1.04)^{8}-1} = \frac{\$16{,}000}{9.2142} = \boxed{\$1736\text{/yr}}$$ The pump's annual sinking-fund depreciation charge is about $\$1736$.
QuantityValue
Straight-line book value at yr 8$\$4000$
Required accumulated depreciation $D_8$$\$16{,}000$
Uniform-series factor $\left[(1.04)^{8}-1\right]/0.04$$9.2142$
Annual sinking-fund charge $R$$\$1736$/yr
Check: the annual sinking-fund deposit ($\$1736$) is less than the $\$2000$ straight-line charge that reaches the same book value, because the 4 % interest the fund earns makes up the $\$264$/yr difference. Assumptions stated as good practice: year-end (ordinary-annuity) deposits, and the 4 % is the fund-earning rate that defines the sinking-fund method rather than a declining-balance rate.