23-Chem-A5 Chemical Plant Design and Economics · May 2017
Question 1 of 6: Propane-Pyrolysis Plant — Flowsheet and Material Balance
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Closed-book exam, 3 hours; one aid sheet permitted. Six questions of equal value (20 marks each); five constitute a complete paper — full solutions to all six are given here. Questions 1 and 2 are quantitative (plant material balance and discounted-cash-flow return); Questions 3–6 are design-practice list/essay questions.
Reference texts: M.S. Peters, K.D. Timmerhaus & R.E. West, Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers (5th ed., McGraw-Hill) — the exam's named primary text (process design development Ch. 2, general design considerations: plant location, safety, materials Ch. 3, interest and profitability Ch. 7–10, materials-transfer/pumps Ch. 14); R.H. Perry & D.W. Green, Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook (9th ed.) — pump types and selection (Sec. 10), pyrolysis kinetics data; O. Levenspiel, Chemical Reaction Engineering (3rd ed.) — first-order plug-flow space-time behind the reactor sizing in Question 1; supporting Canadian practice from CCOHS and the CSA Z767 / provincial OH&S process-safety-management framework for Question 5.
Question 1: Propane-Pyrolysis Plant — Flowsheet and Material Balance (20 marks)
Given. Feed gas of fixed composition; absorber recovers 75 % of the feed propane and the total absorbed stream is 50 mol/hr; single reactor reaction C3H8→C2H4+CH4, per-pass conversion 60 %, k = 0.28 s−1; first fractionator recovers 95 % of the unconverted propane (3 % ethane impurity) for recycle; reactor feed diluted with an equal volume (hence equal moles) of steam.
Quantity
Value
Absorbed (= recovered propane)
50 mol/hr
Propane recovery in absorber
75 %
Feed propane mole fraction $y_{C_3}$
0.10
Per-pass conversion $X$
0.60
Fractionator propane recovery
0.95
Rate constant $k$
0.28 s−1
Find. A labelled process flow diagram, and the calculable stream quantities: feed gas rate and composition, propane lost in the lean gas, propane fed to the reactor, ethylene product, recycle stream, steam and total reactor-inlet flow, plus the reactor space-time implied by k and X.
Approach
Take a 1-hour basis. The absorber and its 75 % recovery fix the whole feed; a steady-state propane balance around the reactor–fractionator recycle loop fixes the reactor throughput; reaction stoichiometry then gives the ethylene product, and the equal-volume steam dilution and the first-order rate law close the reactor inlet and space-time.
Figure 1.1 — Process flow diagram of the propane-pyrolysis plant. Lean feed gas is contacted in the lean-oil absorber (135 psig, 100 °F); the recovered propane is steam-stripped (25 psig, 230 °F), the water condensed out, and the gas compressed to 50 psig, blended with the propane recycle and an equal volume of dilution steam, and pyrolysed at 1300 °F. Effluent is cooled (steam knocked out), compressed to 285 psig, dried over activated alumina, and sent to fractionator 1, whose bottoms (95 % of the unconverted C3H8 with 3 % C2H6) throttle back to the reactor; two finishing towers deliver ethylene product. Flow quantities are in mol/hr on a 1-hour basis.
Fix the feed from the absorber recovery. The 50 mol/hr absorbed is the recovered propane (the heaviest, most-absorbable component), i.e. 75 % of the propane in the feed:
$$n_{C_3,\text{feed}} = \frac{50}{0.75} = 66.67 \text{ mol/hr}$$
Because propane is 10 mol % of the feed, the total feed gas is
$$F = \frac{n_{C_3,\text{feed}}}{y_{C_3}} = \frac{66.67}{0.10} = 666.7 \text{ mol/hr}$$
$\boxed{\text{Feed gas } F = 666.7\ \text{mol/hr}}$
Feed component flows and propane leaving in the lean gas. Multiplying $F$ by each mole fraction gives N2 33.33, CH4 433.33, C2H6 133.33, C3H8 66.67 mol/hr. The 25 % of propane not recovered leaves overhead in the lean gas:
$$n_{C_3,\text{lost}} = 66.67 - 50 = 16.67 \text{ mol/hr (with essentially all the N}_2\text{, CH}_4\text{, C}_2\text{H}_6\text{)}$$
Propane balance around the reactor–fractionator loop. All 50 mol/hr of stripped propane enters the loop as fresh feed $F_p$. Each pass converts 60 %; of the unconverted 40 %, the fractionator recovers 95 % for recycle. At steady state the propane fed to the reactor $P_r$ satisfies
$$P_r = F_p + 0.95\,(1-X)\,P_r = 50 + 0.95(0.40)P_r$$
Solving, $P_r\,[1 - 0.38] = 50$, so
$$P_r = \frac{50}{1-0.38} = 80.65 \text{ mol/hr}$$
$\boxed{\text{Propane to reactor } P_r = 80.65\ \text{mol/hr}}$
Per-pass conversion products. Converted propane $= X P_r = 0.60(80.65) = 48.39$ mol/hr; unconverted $= 32.26$ mol/hr, of which recycled $= 0.95(32.26) = 30.65$ and purge-lost $= 1.61$ mol/hr. The stoichiometry C3H8→C2H4+CH4 makes one ethylene and one methane per converted mole:
$$n_{C_2H_4} = n_{CH_4,\text{made}} = 48.39 \text{ mol/hr}$$
$\boxed{\text{Ethylene product} = 48.39\ \text{mol/hr}}$ A whole-loop check closes: fresh in (50) = converted (48.39) + purge loss (1.61). ✓
Recycle stream (with 3 % ethane). The recycled propane is 97 % of the bottoms, so
$$R = \frac{30.65}{0.97} = 31.59 \text{ mol/hr} \;\;(30.65\text{ C}_3\text{H}_8 + 0.95\text{ C}_2\text{H}_6)$$
$\boxed{\text{Recycle} = 31.59\ \text{mol/hr}}$ The combined hydrocarbon feed to the reactor is $F_p + R = 50 + 31.59 = 81.59$ mol/hr, whose propane content $50 + 30.65 = 80.65 = P_r$ — consistent with Step 3.
Steam dilution and reactor inlet. "Equal volume of steam" means equal moles for an ideal gas, so steam $= 81.59$ mol/hr and
$$n_{\text{reactor in}} = 81.59 + 81.59 = 163.2 \text{ mol/hr}$$
Reactor space-time. For a first-order reaction in an (assumed) plug-flow reactor, the space-time for 60 % conversion is
$$\tau = \frac{-\ln(1-X)}{k} = \frac{-\ln(0.40)}{0.28} = 3.27 \text{ s}$$
$\boxed{\tau \approx 3.3\ \text{s}}$ The steam both supplies pyrolysis endotherm and lowers hydrocarbon partial pressure (favouring the cracking).
Check: the 50 mol/hr "absorbed" is taken as recovered propane only, so that "75 % of the propane recovered" and "50 mol/hr absorbed" are consistent (giving a self-closing propane balance). If some ethane also co-absorbed, the propane recovered would be slightly under 50 and the feed correspondingly smaller; the exam data are internally consistent only under the propane-only reading, which is the intended one. The $\tau$ result assumes an ideal isothermal plug-flow reactor at reaction conditions.