16-Civ-B2 Advanced Structural Design · December 2018
Question 3 of 7: Long-term deflection of BCD and the footing at F
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, December 2018 — 16-Civ-B2
Advanced Structural Design. Three hours, closed book (design handbooks and
textbooks permitted, no notes). Seven design questions; any five constitute a complete
paper and all questions carry equal value. Page 1 supplies the design data reproduced
below and states that all loads shown are unfactored. All seven
questions are worked here, because the paper is being used as a study
resource rather than sat under examination conditions.
Material
Property
Value
Concrete
$f'_c$
30 MPa
Structural steel
$F_y$
350 MPa
Reinforcing steel
$f_y$
400 MPa
Prestressed concrete
$f_{ci}$ at transfer
35 MPa
$f'_c$
50 MPa
modular ratio $n$
6
$f_{ult}$
1750 MPa
$f_y$ (strand)
1450 MPa
$f_{initial}$
1200 MPa
loss of prestress
240 MPa
Reference texts. The answers are written to the Canadian
limit-states codes that Engineers Canada lists for this examination:
CSA S16:19, Design of Steel Structures, with the CISC
Handbook of Steel Construction.
CSA A23.3:19, Design of Concrete Structures, with the Cement Association
of Canada Concrete Design Handbook, 4th ed.
CSA S6:19, Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code, for the pedestrian
bridge of Question 6.
National Building Code of Canada 2020, Part 4, for load combinations.
Kulak and Grondin, Limit States Design in Structural Steel;
MacGregor and Bartlett, Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design
(Canadian edition); Collins and Mitchell, Prestressed Concrete Structures;
Hibbeler, Structural Analysis.
Check — load factors. Page 1 states only that the loads
shown are unfactored; it gives no dead/live split. A single factor of
$\alpha = 1.5$ is therefore applied to every printed load, and $1.25$ to self weight
that the solution itself introduces (the concrete members, the steel frame and the
plate girder). This is the NBCC 2020 Case 2 combination $1.25D + 1.5L$ read at its
live-load end. The collapse mechanisms, section classifications and interaction
equations below are independent of that choice — only the magnitudes move with
it. Serviceability answers (Question 3's deflection, Question 5's no-tension
condition, Question 6's deflection) use unfactored loads throughout, as they must.
Question 3: Long-term deflection of BCD and the footing at F
Given. The frame and section of Questions 1 and 2: beam
400 × 900 mm with 4-30M bottom and 4-25M top, $d = 830$ mm,
$f'_c = 30$ MPa. Service (unfactored) moments from the same analysis are
$M_B = 328.4$, $M_C = 447.1$ and $M_D = 288.4$ kN·m, and
the service vertical reaction at F is 448.5 kN with a base moment of
35.4 kN·m and a horizontal thrust of 15.5 kN. Allowable
bearing pressure 500 kPa.
Find. (i) the long-term deflection at C; (ii) a footing size at F.
Approach. Compute the effective second moment of area by Branson's
expression at the three critical sections, scale the elastic deflection, then apply
the A23.3 creep multiplier. Size the footing on service pressure and check it for
punching, one-way shear and flexure at factored load.
Part (i) — find the cracking moment. With
$f_r = 0.6 \lambda \sqrt{f'_c} = 3.29$ MPa and $I_g = 2.43 \times 10^{10}$ mm$^4$,
$$M_{cr} = \frac{f_r I_g}{y_t} = 177.5 \text{ kN}\cdot\text{m}$$
All three critical sections carry more than this under service load, so the whole
span is cracked and the gross section badly overstates the stiffness.
Compute the cracked and effective stiffnesses. With
$n = E_s/E_c = 8.11$, the cracked transformed second moment at mid-span (4-30M
tension, 4-25M compression) is $I_{cr} = 1.0161 \times 10^{10}$ mm$^4$ with the neutral axis
at $kd = 236.0$ mm. Branson's expression
$$I_e = I_{cr} + (I_g - I_{cr})\left(\frac{M_{cr}}{M_a}\right)^{3}$$
gives $1.1045 \times 10^{10}$ mm$^4$ at C, $1.0441 \times 10^{10}$ at B and $1.1677 \times 10^{10}$ at D. The Cl 9.8.2.4
weighting for a member continuous at both ends,
$I_e = 0.70 I_{e,mid} + 0.15(I_{e1} + I_{e2})$, gives $1.1049 \times 10^{10}$ mm$^4$, i.e.
$I_g/I_e = 2.199$.
Scale the immediate deflection. The elastic frame analysis on
gross sections gives 7.056 mm at C under service load. Deflection is inversely
proportional to $EI$, so
$$\Delta_i = 7.056 \times 2.199 = 15.52 \text{ mm}$$
Apply the creep and shrinkage multiplier. Cl 9.8.2.5 gives the
additional long-term deflection as $[s/(1 + 50\rho')]$ times the sustained immediate
deflection, with $s = 2.0$ beyond five years. The 4-25M bars lapped through mid-span
give $\rho' = 0.602$ %, so the multiplier is
$2.0/(1 + 50 \times 0.00602) = 1.537$ and
$$\boxed{\Delta_{total} = \Delta_i (1 + 1.537) = 39.4 \text{ mm} = L/305}$$
if the whole service load is treated as sustained. The A23.3 Table 9.3 limit for a
member not supporting brittle finishes is $L/240 = 50$ mm, so the beam passes with
about 20 % to spare.
Part (ii) — size the footing on bearing pressure. The
service load at F is the 448.5 kN reaction plus 86.4 kN of column
self weight; with a 1.6 m square pad 500 mm thick the total is 565.6 kN, and
the base moment is 35.4 kN·m plus the thrust times the pad depth,
$43.2$ kN·m in all. The eccentricity $e = 76.3$ mm is well
inside the middle third ($e/B = 0.048$), so
$$q = \frac{P}{B^{2}}\left(1 \pm \frac{6e}{B}\right)
= 284.2 \text{ and } 157.7 \text{ kPa} \; \lt \; 500 \text{ kPa}$$
The pad is not governed by the ground — 500 kPa is a stiff-till or weak-rock
value — but by the need to project far enough beyond a 500 × 900 mm
column to develop the reinforcement.
Check punching and one-way shear. At factored load
$C_f = 767.8$ kN and $q_f = 300$ kPa, with $d = 405$ mm. The
critical punching perimeter at $d/2$ from the column face is
$b_o = 4420$ mm, and
$$V_f = 414 \text{ kN}, \qquad
v_r = 0.38 \phi_c \lambda \sqrt{f'_c} \;\Rightarrow\; V_r = 2422 \text{ kN}$$
a utilisation of only 0.171. One-way shear at $d$ from the face gives
69.6 kN against 374 kN. Both are trivial because the pad is thick
relative to its plan size.
Design the footing steel. The cantilever moment at the column
face is 72.6 kN·m over the 1.6 m width, which needs far less steel
than the Cl 7.8.1 shrinkage and temperature minimum of
$0.002 A_g = 1600$ mm$^2$ in each direction. Provide 8-15M each way
in the bottom mat, and dowel the column bars into the pad with a compression lap.
Footing at F: 1.6 m square, 500 mm thick, with the service bearing pressure it develops.
Check — what fraction of the load is sustained. The paper
gives no dead/live split, so the boxed answer treats the entire service load as
permanent, which is the conservative reading. If 60 % were sustained the long-term
deflection would fall to 29.8 mm. Either figure clears $L/240 = 50$ mm;
neither clears the $L/480 = 25$ mm limit that would apply if the beam supported
brittle partitions, so that limitation should be stated on the drawing.