16-Civ-B2 Advanced Structural Design · December 2018
Question 7 of 7: Two-span continuous welded plate girder
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, December 2018 — 16-Civ-B2
Advanced Structural Design. Three hours, closed book (design handbooks and
textbooks permitted, no notes). Seven design questions; any five constitute a complete
paper and all questions carry equal value. Page 1 supplies the design data reproduced
below and states that all loads shown are unfactored. All seven
questions are worked here, because the paper is being used as a study
resource rather than sat under examination conditions.
Material
Property
Value
Concrete
$f'_c$
30 MPa
Structural steel
$F_y$
350 MPa
Reinforcing steel
$f_y$
400 MPa
Prestressed concrete
$f_{ci}$ at transfer
35 MPa
$f'_c$
50 MPa
modular ratio $n$
6
$f_{ult}$
1750 MPa
$f_y$ (strand)
1450 MPa
$f_{initial}$
1200 MPa
loss of prestress
240 MPa
Reference texts. The answers are written to the Canadian
limit-states codes that Engineers Canada lists for this examination:
CSA S16:19, Design of Steel Structures, with the CISC
Handbook of Steel Construction.
CSA A23.3:19, Design of Concrete Structures, with the Cement Association
of Canada Concrete Design Handbook, 4th ed.
CSA S6:19, Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code, for the pedestrian
bridge of Question 6.
National Building Code of Canada 2020, Part 4, for load combinations.
Kulak and Grondin, Limit States Design in Structural Steel;
MacGregor and Bartlett, Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design
(Canadian edition); Collins and Mitchell, Prestressed Concrete Structures;
Hibbeler, Structural Analysis.
Check — load factors. Page 1 states only that the loads
shown are unfactored; it gives no dead/live split. A single factor of
$\alpha = 1.5$ is therefore applied to every printed load, and $1.25$ to self weight
that the solution itself introduces (the concrete members, the steel frame and the
plate girder). This is the NBCC 2020 Case 2 combination $1.25D + 1.5L$ read at its
live-load end. The collapse mechanisms, section classifications and interaction
equations below are independent of that choice — only the magnitudes move with
it. Serviceability answers (Question 3's deflection, Question 5's no-tension
condition, Question 6's deflection) use unfactored loads throughout, as they must.
Given. Two 12 m spans, pinned at A and on rollers at B and C.
Unfactored loads of 300 kN at the mid-point of span AB and 200 kN at the mid-point of
span BC. Lateral support at 2.0 m intervals; $F_y = 350$ MPa.
Find. A welded plate-girder section adequate in bending, in shear
and in their interaction, using the stiffened-web approach.
Figure 4 and the factored bending moment it produces. The interior support attracts hogging from both spans at once.
Approach. Analyse the continuous beam, choose a deliberately slender
web so transverse stiffeners can be used, then check flexure with the Cl 14.3.4
reduction, shear with tension-field action, and the two together.
Analyse the two-span beam. For a point load at the mid-point of
one span, the hogging moment at the interior support is $3PL/32$; the two loads
together give $-(3 \times 300 \times 12 + 3 \times 200 \times 12)/32 = -562.5$
kN·m unfactored. Factoring by 1.5 and adding the girder's own
0.91 kN/m gives
$$\begin{gathered}M_B = -864.3 \text{ kN}\cdot\text{m}, \\ M_{span} = +938.4 \text{ kN}\cdot\text{m}, \\ V_f = 303.9 \text{ kN}\end{gathered}$$
with a reaction at B of 533 kN. The sagging moment in the heavier span slightly
exceeds the hogging moment at the support, so both must be designed for.
Choose a web that suits the stiffened-web approach. The whole
point of the question is a web too slender to carry shear by beam action alone. Take
a web 800 × 6 mm, so $h/w = 133.3$. That is far above the
Class 3 limit of $1900/\sqrt{F_y} = 101.6$, making the web Class 4 and the
member a plate girder governed by Cl 14, but well inside the Cl 14.3.1 ceiling of
$83\,000/F_y = 237$ that applies when transverse stiffeners are
provided.
Size the flanges. Try 220 × 16 mm flanges, giving
an overall depth of 832 mm, $A = 11840$ mm$^2$, $I = 1.4281 \times 10^{9}$ mm$^4$ and
$S = 3.4328 \times 10^{6}$ mm$^3$. The flange slenderness $b/2t = 6.88$ is inside the
Class 1 limit of 7.75, so the flanges themselves are compact and the section's
weakness is entirely in the web.
Check flexure with the slender-web reduction. A Class 3 section
would give $M_r = \phi S F_y = 1081$ kN·m, but Cl 14.3.4 reduces this
whenever $h/w$ exceeds $1900/\sqrt{M_f/(\phi S)} = 109.0$, because the slender
web sheds compression into the flanges:
$$M_r' = M_r\left[1 - 0.0005 \frac{A_w}{A_f}\left(\frac{h}{w}
- \frac{1900}{\sqrt{M_f/\phi S}}\right)\right] = 1063 \text{ kN}\cdot\text{m}$$
a reduction of only 1.7 %, so
$$\boxed{M_r' = 1063 \text{ kN}\cdot\text{m} \; \gt \; M_f = 938.4 \text{ kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$
a utilisation of 0.882. Lateral torsional buckling does not intervene: with
bracing at 2.0 m, $L/r_y = 40.8$ and Cl 13.6 returns the full Class 3
capacity.
Design the web for shear using tension-field action. Space the
intermediate transverse stiffeners at $a = 1200$ mm, i.e. $a/h = 1.5$, so
$$k_v = 5.34 + \frac{4}{(a/h)^2} = 7.118$$
Since $h/w = 133.3$ exceeds $621\sqrt{k_v/F_y} = 88.6$, the web buckles
elastically and
$$F_{cri} = \frac{180\,000 k_v}{(h/w)^2} = 72.1 \text{ MPa}$$
The post-buckling tension field adds
$k_a(0.50 F_y - 0.866 F_{cri})$ with $k_a = 1/\sqrt{1 + (a/h)^2} = 0.555$, giving
$F_s = 134.5$ MPa and
$$\boxed{V_r = \phi A_w F_s = 581 \text{ kN} \; \gt \; V_f = 303.9 \text{ kN}}$$
a utilisation of 0.523. Note that $F_{cri}$ alone would give only 311 kN:
the tension field is contributing half the resistance, which is exactly why the
stiffeners are needed.
Check the moment-shear interaction. Where tension-field action
is relied upon, Cl 14.6 requires
$$0.727\frac{M_f}{M_r} + 0.455\frac{V_f}{V_r} \le 1.0$$
Taking the largest moment and the largest shear together, which is conservative
because they do not occur at the same section, gives
$$0.727 \times 0.882 + 0.455 \times 0.523 = 0.879 \le 1.0$$
Design the stiffeners. Provide intermediate transverse
stiffeners on one side of the web at 1200 mm centres throughout, and bearing
stiffeners in pairs at A, B, C and under each load. The interior reaction is
533 kN; a pair of 100 × 14 mm plates has $b/t = 7.1$ against the
Cl 14.4.2 limit of $200/\sqrt{F_y} = 10.7$, and acting with the adjacent
$25w$ of web gives an effective column of 3700 mm$^2$ at $KL/r = 11.4$,
so $C_r = 1160$ kN — a ratio of 0.459. The fitted bearing ends
give $B_r = 1.5\phi A F_y = 1323$ kN, a ratio of 0.403.
Detail the welds. Continuous 6 mm fillet welds each side connect
the web to the flanges; the horizontal shear flow $VQ/I$ at the flange-web junction
is well within their capacity at the maximum shear. Stop the intermediate stiffeners
short of the tension flange by four to six times the web thickness so they do not
create a fatigue-sensitive detail at the point of maximum tensile stress.
The welded section and its stiffening. The bearing stiffeners are the pairs at the supports; the rest are single intermediate plates.
Item
Design value
Section
web 800 × 6 mm, flanges 220 × 16 mm, depth 832 mm
Web classification
$h/w = 133.3$ (Class 4; Cl 14.3.1 limit 237)
Design moments
$-864.3$ kN·m at B, $+938.4$ kN·m in span
Moment resistance
$M_r' = 1063$ kN·m, utilisation 0.882
Design shear
$V_f = 303.9$ kN
Shear resistance
$V_r = 581$ kN with stiffeners at 1200 mm, utilisation 0.523