NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Elec-A5 Electronics · May 2013

Question 2 of 6: Common-Emitter Amplifier Design

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, May 2013 — 07-Elec-A5 Electronics. Three hours, closed book; one approved Casio or Sharp calculator permitted. Six questions are printed, each worth 20 marks, and five constitute a complete paper — all six are solved below as a study resource. Op-amps are ideal with ±15 V supplies unless stated otherwise.

Reference texts. A. S. Sedra & K. C. Smith, Microelectronic Circuits, 8th ed. (Oxford): Ch. 5–7 (MOSFET and BJT amplifiers, common-emitter and common-gate stages), Ch. 4 (diode limiters, clamps and rectifiers), Ch. 13–14 (CMOS/NMOS inverter VTC and noise margins), and Ch. 2 (op-amp precision rectifiers and slew rate).

Question 2: Common-Emitter Amplifier Design (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

Given data (PNP common-emitter stage)
QuantityValueQuantityValue
β100VCC10 V
VEB(on)0.7 VRL10 kΩ
VEC(sat)0.3 VRE1 kΩ
VA∞IE2 mA
Target gain|vout/vs| = 100 V/V

Find. $R_1$, $R_2$, $R_C$ for the stated bias and gain; the output resistance $R_O$; and the maximum undistorted peak-to-peak swing.

[Figure not reproduced: Q2 circuit (redrawn): PNP common-emitter amplifier. RE (bypassed by C3) sets the DC emitter current from VCC; R1/R2 bias the base; RC is the collector load to ground; the signal couples in through C1 and out through C2 to RL. See the official exam paper.]

Approach. Set the small-signal transconductance from the bias current, size $R_C$ for the required gain (emitter fully bypassed by $C_3$), then place the DC operating point with the $R_1/R_2$ divider and check the swing against the AC load line.

  1. Bias-point currents. With $\beta=100$, $I_C=\alpha I_E=\tfrac{\beta}{\beta+1}I_E=\tfrac{100}{101}(2\ \text{mA})\approx1.98\ \text{mA}\approx2\ \text{mA}$, and $I_B=I_C/\beta\approx20\ \mu\text{A}$. The transconductance is $$g_m=\frac{I_C}{V_T}=\frac{1.98\ \text{mA}}{25\ \text{mV}}\approx79\ \text{mS}.$$
  2. Size $R_C$ for the gain. $C_3$ bypasses $R_E$, so the mid-band gain is $v_{out}/v_s=-g_m\,(R_C\parallel R_L)$ (the source drives the base directly). Setting $|{-}g_m(R_C\parallel R_L)|=100$: $$R_C\parallel R_L=\frac{100}{g_m}=1.26\ \text{k}\Omega \;\Rightarrow\; R_C=\left(\frac{1}{1.26\text{k}}-\frac{1}{10\text{k}}\right)^{-1}=\boxed{1.45\ \text{k}\Omega}.$$
  3. Place the DC operating point. The emitter sits at $V_E=V_{CC}-I_E R_E=10-2\ \text{mA}\times1\ \text{k}\Omega=8\ \text{V}$, so the base is $V_B=V_E-V_{EB(on)}=8-0.7=7.3\ \text{V}$.
  4. Bias divider $R_1,R_2$. Choose a stiff bleeder current $I_{R_1}=10\,I_B=0.20\ \text{mA}\gg I_B$ for bias stability. Then $$R_1=\frac{V_B}{I_{R_1}}=\frac{7.3}{0.20\ \text{mA}}\approx\boxed{36.9\ \text{k}\Omega},\qquad R_2=\frac{V_{CC}-V_B}{I_{R_1}+I_B}=\frac{2.7}{0.22\ \text{mA}}\approx\boxed{12.4\ \text{k}\Omega}.$$
  5. (b) Output resistance. Looking back into the collector with $V_A=\infty$ (so $r_o=\infty$), $$R_O=R_C\parallel r_o=R_C=\boxed{1.45\ \text{k}\Omega}.$$
  6. (c) Maximum undistorted swing. The quiescent collector voltage is $V_C=I_C R_C=1.98\ \text{mA}\times1.45\ \text{k}\Omega\approx2.86\ \text{V}$, so $V_{ECQ}=V_E-V_C=8-2.86=5.14\ \text{V}$. On the AC load line $R_{ac}=R_C\parallel R_L=1.25\ \text{k}\Omega$, the two clipping limits are the cut-off peak $I_C R_{ac}=1.98\ \text{mA}\times1.25\ \text{k}\Omega=2.50\ \text{V}$ and the saturation head-room $V_{ECQ}-V_{EC(sat)}=5.14-0.3=4.84\ \text{V}$. The smaller governs: $\hat v_o=2.50\ \text{V}$, so $$V_{o(pp)}=2\hat v_o=\boxed{5.0\ \text{V}_{pp}}.$$
Q2 — design results
QuantityResult
RC1.45 kΩ
R136.9 kΩ
R212.4 kΩ
RO1.45 kΩ (= RC)
Max undistorted swing5.0 Vpp (cut-off limited)

Check: the bleeder current $I_{R_1}=10I_B$ is a standard design choice (stiff divider), not a unique answer; any $I_{R_1}$ several times $I_B$ that keeps $V_B\approx7.3$ V is acceptable and shifts $R_1,R_2$ proportionally. The gain and swing results are independent of that choice.