NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Elec-A5 Electronics · December 2019

Question 2 of 5

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams — December 2019, 16-Elec-A5 Electronics. Closed book; a Casio or Sharp approved calculator permitted. Three hours. Answer all five (5) questions; each worth 20 marks. Unless stated, op-amps are ideal with ±15 V supplies, and ground and chassis are common.

Reference texts. A. S. Sedra & K. C. Smith, Microelectronic Circuits, 8th ed. (Oxford, 2020) — diode piecewise-linear models & limiters (Ch. 4), MOSFET biasing & the common-source amplifier (Ch. 7), op-amp dynamics/slew rate (Ch. 2), CMOS inverter VTC and noise margins (Ch. 13), and precision/limiting op-amp–diode circuits (Ch. 4 & 18). B. Razavi, Fundamentals of Microelectronics, 2nd ed., is an equivalent secondary reference.

Question 2

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. An n-channel MOSFET common-source stage with the square-law model $I_D=\tfrac12 K(V_{GS}-V_{TH})^2$ (in saturation, $\lambda=0$), gate biased by divider RG1/RG2, source degeneration RS, drain load RD, and an ac-coupled load RL.

Given data
QuantityValueQuantityValue
VTH1 VVDD15 V
K4 mA/V2ID0.5 mA
VS3.5 VVD6 V
Rin1.67 MΩR1100 kΩ
RL200 kΩλ0

Find. (a) the four bias resistors; (b) the overall small-signal gain from the source v1 to vout. (Note: the printed “vi/vout” is the reciprocal of the usual voltage-gain definition and is taken here as vout/vi, with the reciprocal reported alongside.)

VDDRG1RG2RDM1RS~v1R1C1vinC2voutRL
Single-stage CS amplifier. RS is not bypassed — there is no capacitor across it — so the source degeneration is present at signal frequencies.

Approach. Fix the source and drain resistors from the required DC drops, get VGS from the square law, and set the gate divider from VG and the specified input resistance; then compute gm and apply the degenerated CS gain, finally scaling by the input attenuation of R1 with Rin.

  1. (a) Source and drain resistors from the DC drops. $$R_S = \frac{V_S}{I_D} = \frac{3.5}{0.5\ \text{mA}} = \boxed{7\ \text{k}\Omega}, \qquad R_D = \frac{V_{DD}-V_D}{I_D} = \frac{15-6}{0.5\ \text{mA}} = \boxed{18\ \text{k}\Omega}.$$
  2. Gate–source voltage from the square law. With $\lambda=0$ and $I_D=\tfrac12 K(V_{GS}-V_{TH})^2$, $$V_{GS}-V_{TH}=\sqrt{\frac{2I_D}{K}}=\sqrt{\frac{2(0.5\ \text{mA})}{4\ \text{mA/V}^2}}=0.5\ \text{V}\ \Rightarrow\ V_{GS}=1.5\ \text{V}.$$
  3. Gate DC voltage. The gate sits above the source by VGS: $$V_G = V_{GS} + V_S = 1.5 + 3.5 = 5\ \text{V}.$$
  4. Gate divider. The divider must set $V_G$ and present $R_{in}=R_{G1}\|R_{G2}$: $$\frac{R_{G2}}{R_{G1}+R_{G2}}=\frac{V_G}{V_{DD}}=\frac{5}{15}=\frac13 \Rightarrow R_{G1}=2R_{G2},\qquad R_{G1}\|R_{G2}=\tfrac23 R_{G2}=1.67\ \text{M}\Omega.$$ Hence $R_{G2}=\boxed{2.5\ \text{M}\Omega}$ and $R_{G1}=\boxed{5.0\ \text{M}\Omega}$ (check: $5\|2.5=1.67\ \text{M}\Omega$, $V_G=15\cdot\tfrac{2.5}{7.5}=5\ \text{V}$).
  5. (b) Transconductance. $$g_m = K(V_{GS}-V_{TH}) = \sqrt{2KI_D} = 4\ \text{mA/V}^2 \times 0.5\ \text{V} = 2\ \text{mA/V}.$$
  6. AC drain load. RD and RL appear in parallel for the signal (VDD is an ac ground, RL is coupled through C2): $$R_D\|R_L = 18\|200 = 16.5\ \text{k}\Omega.$$
  7. Degenerated stage gain. With RS un-bypassed and $r_o=\infty$ ($\lambda=0$), $$\frac{v_d}{v_g}=-\frac{g_m(R_D\|R_L)}{1+g_mR_S}=-\frac{(2\ \text{mA/V})(16.5\ \text{k}\Omega)}{1+(2\ \text{mA/V})(7\ \text{k}\Omega)}=-\frac{33.0}{15}=-2.20.$$
  8. Input attenuation and overall gain. The gate sees R1 feeding Rin: $$\frac{v_g}{v_i}=\frac{R_{in}}{R_1+R_{in}}=\frac{1.67}{0.10+1.67}=0.944,$$ $$\frac{v_{out}}{v_i}= 0.944\times(-2.20)=\boxed{-2.08}\quad\Bigl(\text{so } \tfrac{v_i}{v_{out}}\approx-0.48\Bigr).$$
Q2 — results
RSRDRG1RG2gmvout/vi
7 kΩ18 kΩ5.0 MΩ2.5 MΩ2 mA/V−2.08
Check: the gain magnitude is only ~2 because RS is un-bypassed (no source bypass capacitor is drawn). Had RS been bypassed, the stage gain would be $-g_m(R_D\|R_L)=-33$ and the overall gain $\approx-31$. The un-bypassed reading matches the figure as drawn.