Question 2 of 5: Tuned Amplifier — Centre Frequency, Gain and Bandwidth
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, December 2014 —
07-Elec-B5, Advanced Electronics. Three hours; closed book; any
non-communicating calculator permitted. Answer all FIVE (5)
questions, each worth 20 marks. The paper instructs candidates to
state clearly any assumptions made where a question admits more than one
interpretation, to start each question on a new page, and to assume that
ground and chassis are common and that op amps are ideal.
Reference texts.
A. S. Sedra and K. C. Smith, Microelectronic Circuits, 8th ed.
— the principal reference for this subject (Ch. 4 zener regulators,
Ch. 8 cascodes, Ch. 10 frequency response, Ch. 11 feedback, Ch. 17 tuned
amplifiers).
B. Razavi, Fundamentals of Microelectronics, 2nd ed. — cited
by name in Question 4 of this paper (Example 9.9, p. 405).
P. R. Gray, P. J. Hurst, S. H. Lewis and R. G. Meyer, Analysis and
Design of Analog Integrated Circuits, 5th ed. — for the differential
and feedback material.
All five questions on this paper are calculation questions built on a
circuit schematic, so each is worked in the standard
Given → Find → Figure → Approach → Steps →
Results shape. Every schematic below was redrawn from the printed figure; where the printed drawing decides an answer, the reading taken is
stated explicitly in a callout.
Question 2: Tuned Amplifier — Centre Frequency, Gain and Bandwidth (20 marks)
Find. The resonant centre frequency of the drain tank, the
small-signal voltage gain from the source $v_s$ to the output at that
frequency, and the 3 dB bandwidth of the resulting band-pass response.
Figure 2.1 — Tuned common-source amplifier. C1, R1 and L1 form a parallel tank between +VDD and the drain; the source is held at ac ground by C2 = ∞.
Approach. Convert the bias current into a transconductance
through the saturation law, recognise the drain load as a parallel RLC
whose impedance is purely $R_1$ at resonance, and read the centre frequency,
mid-band gain and bandwidth off the three standard parallel-tank results.
Turn the bias current into a small-signal transconductance.
The tail current source sets the drain current, so with $\lambda=0$ the
saturation law gives the overdrive directly:
$$I_D=\tfrac12 K\,(V_{GS}-V_{TH})^2=\tfrac12 K\,V_{ov}^2
\;\Rightarrow\;V_{ov}=\sqrt{\frac{2I_D}{K}}=\sqrt{\frac{2(2\ \text{mA})}{1\ \text{mA/V}^2}}=2.00\ \text{V},$$
$$g_m=K\,V_{ov}=(1\ \text{mA/V}^2)(2.00\ \text{V})=2.00\ \text{mA/V}.$$
The device therefore sits at $V_{GS}=V_{TH}+V_{ov}=3.0$ V. Two equivalent forms,
$g_m=2I_D/V_{ov}$ and $g_m=\sqrt{2KI_D}$, return the same 2 mA/V, which is a
free check on the algebra.
Part (a) — find where the tank resonates. The
inductive and capacitive susceptances of the parallel tank cancel when
$\omega L_1=1/(\omega C_1)$, so
$$\boxed{\omega_o=\frac{1}{\sqrt{L_1C_1}}
=\frac{1}{\sqrt{(1\times10^{-6})(200\times10^{-12})}}=7.07\times10^{7}\ \text{rad/s}}$$
which is $f_o=\omega_o/2\pi=11.25$ MHz. Evaluating the full tank admittance at
this frequency returns exactly $1/R_1$ with zero imaginary part, confirming that
the load really is resistive there.
Part (b) — evaluate the gain at resonance. At
$\omega_o$ the drain sees only $R_1$, because $\lambda=0$ removes $r_o$ and the
tank reactances cancel. The gate is driven from the ideal source $v_s$ with no
series resistance and the source terminal is grounded by $C_2$, so
$v_{gs}=v_s$ and $C_{gs}$ carries current from the source without attenuating
it. Hence
$$\boxed{\frac{v_{OUT}}{v_s}\bigg|_{\omega_o}=-g_m R_1
=-(2.00\ \text{mA/V})(2\ \text{k}\Omega)=-4.00}$$
i.e. a magnitude of 4.00 (12.04 dB) with the 180 degree inversion of a
common-source stage.
Confirm that the feed-forward through $C_{gd}$ is negligible.
$C_{gd}$ injects a little of $v_s$ straight into the drain node. Writing the
drain-node equation with that path kept,
$$\frac{v_{OUT}}{v_s}=\frac{j\omega_o C_{gd}-g_m}{1/R_1+j\omega_o C_{gd}},$$
and with $\omega_o C_{gd}=7.07\times10^{-5}$ S this evaluates to
$3.96\,\angle\,169.9^{\circ}$ — within 1 percent of the ideal
$-4.00$. The simple answer is therefore the right one to quote, and the exact
form only matters if a phase specification is at stake.
Part (c) — get the bandwidth from the tank's damping.
For a parallel RLC the 3 dB bandwidth is fixed by the resistance and
capacitance alone:
$$\boxed{\text{BW}=\frac{1}{R_1C_1}
=\frac{1}{(2\times10^{3})(200\times10^{-12})}=2.50\times10^{6}\ \text{rad/s}}$$
which is 398 kHz. The corresponding loaded quality factor is
$$Q=\frac{\omega_o}{\text{BW}}=\frac{7.07\times10^{7}}{2.50\times10^{6}}=28.3,$$
and the independent form $Q=R_1\sqrt{C_1/L_1}=28.3$ agrees exactly.
Quantify the correction the transistor capacitances make.
Seen from the drain, $C_{gd}$ adds $C_{gd}(1+1/|A_v|)=1.25$ pF in parallel with
the tank, giving $C_{tot}=201.25$ pF. That shifts the centre frequency to
$7.049\times10^{7}$ rad/s (0.3 percent low) and the bandwidth to
$2.484\times10^{6}$ rad/s (0.6 percent low). Both are far inside the tolerance
of any real 200 pF capacitor, so the uncorrected answers stand.
Check: the tank topology is settled by the examination drawing, because a series L–C branch would invert every answer. On this paper $C_1$, $R_1$ and $L_1$ are unambiguously three
parallel branches strapped between the +$V_{DD}$ rail and the drain,
with junction dots at both ends — a band-pass response, as assumed above.
Note also that the gain is asked as $v_{OUT}/v_s$ rather than
$v_{OUT}/v_{IN}$; here the two coincide because no source resistance is drawn
or given, so no input divider applies and $C_{gs}$ never enters the answer.