Question 5 of 5: Common-source amplifier — bypassed and unbypassed source, and the new 3 dB frequency
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, December 2015 — 07-Elec-B5
Advanced Electronics. Three hours, CLOSED BOOK; any non-communicating
calculator permitted. Answer all FIVE (5) questions; all questions
are worth 20 marks each. In schematics ground and chassis are common; op-amps are
ideal and supplies are ±15 V unless stated otherwise. Candidates are urged to
state any interpretation assumptions inside their answer — this solution does
so in the shaded Check callouts.
Reference texts.
A. S. Sedra & K. C. Smith, Microelectronic Circuits, 8th ed. —
Ch. 4 (diodes / shunt and series regulators), Ch. 7 (transistor amplifiers),
Ch. 10 (frequency response, open-circuit time constants), Ch. 11 (feedback),
Ch. 12 (output stages), Ch. 17 (tuned amplifiers).
B. Razavi, Fundamentals of Microelectronics, 2nd ed. — Ch. 8
(bias and small-signal models), Ch. 11 (frequency response, Miller's theorem),
Ch. 12 (feedback topologies).
P. R. Gray, P. J. Hurst, S. H. Lewis & R. G. Meyer, Analysis and Design
of Analog Integrated Circuits, 5th ed. — Ch. 7 (frequency response),
Ch. 8 (feedback).
C. K. Alexander & M. N. O. Sadiku, Fundamentals of Electric Circuits,
7th ed. — Ch. 14 (resonance, bandwidth and quality factor).
Check — how the figures were recovered. Every circuit on this paper carries data that exists only in the drawing (which
branch a component sits in, which transistor terminal the source drives). Where a drawing
is ambiguous or under-specified, the reading used is stated explicitly in a
Check callout inside that question rather than being buried in the
arithmetic.
Question 5: Common-source amplifier — bypassed and unbypassed source, and the new 3 dB frequency (20 marks)
Find. The mid-band gain with RS bypassed, the mid-band gain
once C2 is removed, and the upper 3 dB frequency of the un-bypassed
circuit.
Q5 — common-source stage with an Ibias current-source tail from VDD, resistive load RL and capacitive load CL at the drain, and RS bypassed by C2 at the source.
Approach. With C2 in place the stage is a textbook
common source loaded by ro ∥ RL. Removing C2
introduces source degeneration, which must be handled with the exact expression because
ro is comparable with RL. The bandwidth then follows from the
open-circuit time constants of Cgs, Cgd and CL.
Part (d) — Take the bypassed mid-band gain. C1 = ∞
couples the gate and C2 = ∞ grounds the source, so no signal current flows
in Ri (a MOSFET gate is an open circuit at mid-band) and
$v_{gs}=v_i$. The drain drives ro in parallel with RL:
$$\boxed{\frac{v_{OUT}}{v_i}=-g_m\left(r_o\parallel R_L\right)
=-(2\ \text{mA/V})\left(\frac{20\times20}{40}\ \text{k}\Omega\right)=-20\ \text{V/V}}$$
Part (e) — Degenerate the stage with RS. Removing
C2 leaves RS in the source lead. Because ro = RL
here, the familiar shortcut $-g_mR_L/(1+g_mR_S)$ is not accurate enough; the exact
result from a two-node solve is
$$\frac{v_{OUT}}{v_i}=\frac{-g_mR_L}{1+g_mR_S+\dfrac{R_L+R_S}{r_o}}
=\frac{-g_mR_Lr_o}{r_o+R_L+R_S\left(1+g_mr_o\right)}$$
$$=\frac{-(2\ \text{mA/V})(20\ \text{k}\Omega)}{1+2+\dfrac{21}{20}}
=\frac{-40}{4.05}\quad\Rightarrow\quad\boxed{\frac{v_{OUT}}{v_i}=-9.88\ \text{V/V}}$$
The shortcut would have returned −13.3 V/V, a 35 % overestimate, because it
silently assumes $r_o\to\infty$. Degeneration has cost slightly more than half the
gain in exchange for a 4.05-fold reduction in sensitivity to gm.
Part (f) — Set up the open-circuit time constants. With three
capacitors and no dominant one obvious, the sum-of-open-circuit-time-constants estimate is
the right tool: for each capacitor find the resistance seen across its terminals with all
other capacitors open, then
$f_H\approx 1/\left(2\pi\sum_k R_kC_k\right)$. Define the effective drain
resistance, which is RL in parallel with the degenerated drain resistance of the
transistor:
$$R_d=R_L\parallel\left[r_o+R_S\left(1+g_mr_o\right)\right]
=20\ \text{k}\Omega\parallel61\ \text{k}\Omega=15.06\ \text{k}\Omega$$
Evaluate the three resistances. CL sits from drain to ground
and therefore sees Rd directly. Cgd bridges gate and drain and picks
up the Miller multiplication of the stage gain found in part (e). Cgs requires
the two remaining node equations to be solved, because the degenerated source node moves
with the gate:
$$R_{CL}=R_d=15.06\ \text{k}\Omega$$
$$R_{gd}=R_i\left(1+\left|A_v\right|\right)+R_d=20(10.88)+15.06=232.6\ \text{k}\Omega$$
$$R_{gs}=\frac{R_i\left(R_L+R_S+r_o\right)+R_S\left(R_L+r_o\right)}{R_L+R_S+r_o\left(1+g_mR_S\right)}
=\frac{20(41)+1(40)}{20+1+20(3)}\ \text{k}\Omega=10.62\ \text{k}\Omega$$
Sum the time constants and invert.
$$\sum R_kC_k=(10.62\ \text{k}\Omega)(20\ \text{fF})+(232.6\ \text{k}\Omega)(5\ \text{fF})
+(15.06\ \text{k}\Omega)(5\ \text{fF})$$
$$=0.212+1.163+0.075=1.451\ \text{ns}$$
$$\boxed{f_H\approx\frac{1}{2\pi\left(1.451\ \text{ns}\right)}=1.10\times10^{8}\ \text{Hz}
=110\ \text{MHz}}$$
Cgd carries 80 % of the total even though it is the smallest capacitor
present — the Miller multiplication by $1+|A_v|$ against a 20 kΩ source
resistance is what dominates the bandwidth.
Check the estimate against an exact solve. Solving the full three-node
admittance system and bisecting for the frequency at which the magnitude falls to
$1/\sqrt{2}$ of its mid-band value gives 111.3 MHz, so the open-circuit time-constant
estimate is 1.4 % low — the usual conservative bias of the method, and close
enough that no further work is warranted. For reference, the same circuit with
C2 fitted has fH = 61.6 MHz: removing the bypass capacitor halves the
gain but nearly doubles the bandwidth, leaving the gain–bandwidth product almost
unchanged.
Part
Quantity
Result
(d)
Mid-band gain, RS bypassed
−20.0 V/V (26.0 dB)
(e)
Mid-band gain, C2 removed
−9.88 V/V (19.9 dB)
(f)
Open-circuit time constants (Cgs, Cgd, CL)
0.212 + 1.163 + 0.075 = 1.451 ns
(f)
Upper 3 dB frequency fH
1.10 × 108 Hz (110 MHz; 111.3 MHz exact)
—
fH with C2 fitted (reference)
61.6 MHz
Check — part labels and the gain used for Miller.
The paper labels this question's three parts (d), (e) and (f) rather than (a), (b), (c);
those labels are kept here so the answer maps onto the script. The Miller factor in
Rgd uses the degenerated gain of 9.88 from part (e), not the bypassed
gain of 20 — using the wrong one inflates fH's dominant term by a factor of
roughly two.