NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Elec-B5 Advanced Electronics · December 2015

Question 5 of 5: Common-source amplifier — bypassed and unbypassed source, and the new 3 dB frequency

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, December 2015 — 07-Elec-B5 Advanced Electronics. Three hours, CLOSED BOOK; any non-communicating calculator permitted. Answer all FIVE (5) questions; all questions are worth 20 marks each. In schematics ground and chassis are common; op-amps are ideal and supplies are ±15 V unless stated otherwise. Candidates are urged to state any interpretation assumptions inside their answer — this solution does so in the shaded Check callouts.

Reference texts.

Check — how the figures were recovered. Every circuit on this paper carries data that exists only in the drawing (which branch a component sits in, which transistor terminal the source drives). Where a drawing is ambiguous or under-specified, the reading used is stated explicitly in a Check callout inside that question rather than being buried in the arithmetic.

Question 5: Common-source amplifier — bypassed and unbypassed source, and the new 3 dB frequency (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

QuantitySymbolValue
Transconductancegm2 mA/V
Output resistancero20 kΩ
Source (signal) resistanceRi20 kΩ
Drain loadRL20 kΩ
Source degeneration resistorRS1 kΩ
Gate-source / gate-drain capacitanceCgs, Cgd20 fF, 5 fF
Load capacitanceCL5 fF
Coupling / bypass capacitorsC1, C2∞ (C2 removed in parts e and f)

Find. The mid-band gain with RS bypassed, the mid-band gain once C2 is removed, and the upper 3 dB frequency of the un-bypassed circuit.

+−viRivIC1M1Ibias+VDDRLCLvOUTRSC2
Q5 — common-source stage with an Ibias current-source tail from VDD, resistive load RL and capacitive load CL at the drain, and RS bypassed by C2 at the source.

Approach. With C2 in place the stage is a textbook common source loaded by ro ∥ RL. Removing C2 introduces source degeneration, which must be handled with the exact expression because ro is comparable with RL. The bandwidth then follows from the open-circuit time constants of Cgs, Cgd and CL.

  1. Part (d) — Take the bypassed mid-band gain. C1 = ∞ couples the gate and C2 = ∞ grounds the source, so no signal current flows in Ri (a MOSFET gate is an open circuit at mid-band) and $v_{gs}=v_i$. The drain drives ro in parallel with RL: $$\boxed{\frac{v_{OUT}}{v_i}=-g_m\left(r_o\parallel R_L\right) =-(2\ \text{mA/V})\left(\frac{20\times20}{40}\ \text{k}\Omega\right)=-20\ \text{V/V}}$$
  2. Part (e) — Degenerate the stage with RS. Removing C2 leaves RS in the source lead. Because ro = RL here, the familiar shortcut $-g_mR_L/(1+g_mR_S)$ is not accurate enough; the exact result from a two-node solve is $$\frac{v_{OUT}}{v_i}=\frac{-g_mR_L}{1+g_mR_S+\dfrac{R_L+R_S}{r_o}} =\frac{-g_mR_Lr_o}{r_o+R_L+R_S\left(1+g_mr_o\right)}$$ $$=\frac{-(2\ \text{mA/V})(20\ \text{k}\Omega)}{1+2+\dfrac{21}{20}} =\frac{-40}{4.05}\quad\Rightarrow\quad\boxed{\frac{v_{OUT}}{v_i}=-9.88\ \text{V/V}}$$ The shortcut would have returned −13.3 V/V, a 35 % overestimate, because it silently assumes $r_o\to\infty$. Degeneration has cost slightly more than half the gain in exchange for a 4.05-fold reduction in sensitivity to gm.
  3. Part (f) — Set up the open-circuit time constants. With three capacitors and no dominant one obvious, the sum-of-open-circuit-time-constants estimate is the right tool: for each capacitor find the resistance seen across its terminals with all other capacitors open, then $f_H\approx 1/\left(2\pi\sum_k R_kC_k\right)$. Define the effective drain resistance, which is RL in parallel with the degenerated drain resistance of the transistor: $$R_d=R_L\parallel\left[r_o+R_S\left(1+g_mr_o\right)\right] =20\ \text{k}\Omega\parallel61\ \text{k}\Omega=15.06\ \text{k}\Omega$$
  4. Evaluate the three resistances. CL sits from drain to ground and therefore sees Rd directly. Cgd bridges gate and drain and picks up the Miller multiplication of the stage gain found in part (e). Cgs requires the two remaining node equations to be solved, because the degenerated source node moves with the gate: $$R_{CL}=R_d=15.06\ \text{k}\Omega$$ $$R_{gd}=R_i\left(1+\left|A_v\right|\right)+R_d=20(10.88)+15.06=232.6\ \text{k}\Omega$$ $$R_{gs}=\frac{R_i\left(R_L+R_S+r_o\right)+R_S\left(R_L+r_o\right)}{R_L+R_S+r_o\left(1+g_mR_S\right)} =\frac{20(41)+1(40)}{20+1+20(3)}\ \text{k}\Omega=10.62\ \text{k}\Omega$$
  5. Sum the time constants and invert. $$\sum R_kC_k=(10.62\ \text{k}\Omega)(20\ \text{fF})+(232.6\ \text{k}\Omega)(5\ \text{fF}) +(15.06\ \text{k}\Omega)(5\ \text{fF})$$ $$=0.212+1.163+0.075=1.451\ \text{ns}$$ $$\boxed{f_H\approx\frac{1}{2\pi\left(1.451\ \text{ns}\right)}=1.10\times10^{8}\ \text{Hz} =110\ \text{MHz}}$$ Cgd carries 80 % of the total even though it is the smallest capacitor present — the Miller multiplication by $1+|A_v|$ against a 20 kΩ source resistance is what dominates the bandwidth.
  6. Check the estimate against an exact solve. Solving the full three-node admittance system and bisecting for the frequency at which the magnitude falls to $1/\sqrt{2}$ of its mid-band value gives 111.3 MHz, so the open-circuit time-constant estimate is 1.4 % low — the usual conservative bias of the method, and close enough that no further work is warranted. For reference, the same circuit with C2 fitted has fH = 61.6 MHz: removing the bypass capacitor halves the gain but nearly doubles the bandwidth, leaving the gain–bandwidth product almost unchanged.
PartQuantityResult
(d)Mid-band gain, RS bypassed−20.0 V/V (26.0 dB)
(e)Mid-band gain, C2 removed−9.88 V/V (19.9 dB)
(f)Open-circuit time constants (Cgs, Cgd, CL)0.212 + 1.163 + 0.075 = 1.451 ns
(f)Upper 3 dB frequency fH1.10 × 108 Hz (110 MHz; 111.3 MHz exact)
—fH with C2 fitted (reference)61.6 MHz

Check — part labels and the gain used for Miller. The paper labels this question's three parts (d), (e) and (f) rather than (a), (b), (c); those labels are kept here so the answer maps onto the script. The Miller factor in Rgd uses the degenerated gain of 9.88 from part (e), not the bypassed gain of 20 — using the wrong one inflates fH's dominant term by a factor of roughly two.

Back to the paper →