NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Elec-B5 Advanced Electronics · December 2019

Question 1 of 5: MOS Differential Amplifier — Bias, Transconductance, Full Current Switching and Input Offset

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, December 2019 — 16-Elec-B5 Advanced Electronics. Three hours; CLOSED BOOK, an approved Casio or Sharp calculator permitted. Five questions, ALL to be answered, 20 marks each. Op-amps are ideal and the supplies are ±15 V unless a question states otherwise; in schematics ground and chassis are common. Where a question leaves an interpretation open, the paper's own Note 1 invites the candidate to state the assumption inside the answer — every such assumption below is flagged in a check callout.

Reference texts. A. S. Sedra and K. C. Smith, Microelectronic Circuits, 8th ed. — Ch. 7 (transistor amplifiers and biasing), Ch. 8 (differential and multistage amplifiers, offset voltage), Ch. 10 (frequency response, short-circuit time constants), Ch. 11 (output stages and power amplifiers), Ch. 12 (feedback topologies). B. Razavi, Fundamentals of Microelectronics, 2nd ed., Ch. 8 (operational amplifier as a black box, non-linear feedback elements) and Ch. 10 (differential amplifiers). P. Gray, P. Hurst, S. Lewis and R. Meyer, Analysis and Design of Analog Integrated Circuits, 5th ed., Ch. 3 (single-transistor amplifiers) and Ch. 8 (feedback).

Check — the paper's own MOSFET convention. The formula sheet printed with Question 1 defines the saturation current as $i_{DS}=\tfrac12 K\,(v_{GS}-V_{TH})^2$ with $K=K'(W/L)=\mu C_{ox}(W/L)$, and that convention is used throughout Questions 1 and 5. Question 2 is the one place where it does not close: with $K=1\ \text{mA/V}^2$ and $V_{GS}=2$ V the sheet would give $I_D=0.5$ mA, whereas the bias network of Question 2 fixes $I_D=1$ mA by three independent routes (the gate divider, $V_S/R_S$, and the stated $V_D$). The bias data therefore governs there, and the transconductance is taken as $g_m=2I_D/V_{ov}$, which is convention-free. Both readings are quoted in Question 2, Step 2.

Question 1: MOS Differential Amplifier — Bias, Transconductance, Full Current Switching and Input Offset (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

QuantitySymbolValue
Tail (bias) current$I_{bias}$20 µA
Threshold voltage (both devices)$V_{TH}$1 V
Aspect ratio$W/L$120 µm / 6 µm = 20
Process transconductance$\mu C_{ox}$20 µA/V2
Resistor mismatch (part b)$\Delta R_D/R_D$2 per cent
Threshold mismatch (part c)$\Delta V_{TH}/V_{TH}$2 per cent

Find. The quiescent gate–source voltages and transconductances of $M_1$ and $M_2$, the differential input that switches the whole tail current into one side, and the input offset voltage produced first by a 2 per cent load-resistor mismatch and then by a 2 per cent threshold mismatch.

+VDDRD1RD2M1M2Ibias−VSSvI1vI2I1I2−vo+
Figure 1.1 — The resistively loaded n-channel differential pair of Question 1. The tail source $I_{bias}$ sets the total current; at balance it divides equally, and the differential output $v_o$ is taken between the two drains.

Approach. Work the quiescent point first from the square-law saturation model at $I_{D}=I_{bias}/2$ per side, then obtain the full-switching input from the condition that one device carries the entire tail current while the other sits exactly at cut-off; the two offset parts follow by asking what differential input restores a balanced output when one parameter is perturbed.

  1. Part (a) — collapse the process data into one device constant. The formula sheet defines the device transconductance parameter as $$K = \mu C_{ox}\left(\frac{W}{L}\right) = 20\ \frac{\mu\text{A}}{\text{V}^2}\times\frac{120\ \mu\text{m}}{6\ \mu\text{m}} = 20\times 20 = 400\ \mu\text{A/V}^2 .$$ Because both transistors are drawn identically and share the same threshold, this single number describes each side of the pair.
  2. Split the tail current and solve for the overdrive. With $v_{I1}=v_{I2}$ the pair is balanced, the two sources sit at a common potential, and each device carries half the tail current, $I_{D1}=I_{D2}=I_{bias}/2 = 10\ \mu\text{A}$. Inverting the saturation law $I_D=\tfrac12 K V_{ov}^2$ gives $$V_{ov}=\sqrt{\frac{2I_D}{K}}=\sqrt{\frac{2\,(10\ \mu\text{A})}{400\ \mu\text{A/V}^2}}=\sqrt{0.05}=0.2236\ \text{V}.$$ Adding the threshold gives the quiescent gate–source voltage of each device, $$\boxed{V_{GS1}=V_{GS2}=V_{TH}+V_{ov}=1+0.2236=1.224\ \text{V}}$$
  3. Evaluate the small-signal transconductance of each device. Differentiating the same square law, $g_m=\partial i_D/\partial v_{GS}=K V_{ov}$, and the three equivalent forms all agree, which is the free check on Step 2: $$\begin{aligned} g_m &= K V_{ov} = (400\ \mu\text{A/V}^2)(0.2236\ \text{V}) = 89.44\ \mu\text{A/V},\\ g_m &= \frac{2I_D}{V_{ov}} = \frac{2\,(10\ \mu\text{A})}{0.2236\ \text{V}} = 89.44\ \mu\text{A/V},\\ g_m &= \sqrt{2KI_D} = \sqrt{2(400)(10)}\ \mu\text{A/V} = 89.44\ \mu\text{A/V}. \end{aligned}$$ Hence $\boxed{g_{m1}=g_{m2}=89.4\ \mu\text{A/V}=0.0894\ \text{mA/V}}$ — a small number, as it must be for a 10 µA tail per side.
  4. Impose full current switching and read off the differential input. Full switching means one device takes the entire tail current and the other is exactly at cut-off. Taking $I_1=I_{bias}$ and $I_2=0$: the conducting device now needs an overdrive $\sqrt{2I_{bias}/K}$, while the cut-off device sits at $v_{GS2}=V_{TH}$ with no overdrive at all. Since both sources share one node, the differential input is the difference of the two gate–source voltages, $$v_{ID}=v_{GS1}-v_{GS2}=\left(V_{TH}+\sqrt{\frac{2I_{bias}}{K}}\right)-V_{TH}=\sqrt{\frac{2\,(20\ \mu\text{A})}{400\ \mu\text{A/V}^2}}=\sqrt{0.1}=0.3162\ \text{V}.$$ Numerically $v_{GS1}=1.316$ V and $v_{GS2}=1.000$ V at that instant. Note the compact form: $\sqrt{2I_{bias}/K}=\sqrt{2}\,V_{ov}$, so $$\boxed{v_{ID}=\pm\sqrt{2}\,V_{ov}=\pm 0.316\ \text{V}}$$ the sign selecting which side captures the current. The pair is therefore linear only over a window of roughly $\pm 0.1$ V and is fully switched by about a third of a volt.
  5. Part (b) — define the input offset produced by a load mismatch. The input offset voltage is the differential input that must be applied to bring the output back to zero when the circuit is not perfectly matched. With $R_{D1}=R_D+\tfrac12\Delta R_D$ and $R_{D2}=R_D-\tfrac12\Delta R_D$ and the inputs tied together, each drain carries $I_{bias}/2$, so the output error voltage is $$v_O = \frac{I_{bias}}{2}\,(R_{D2}-R_{D1}) = -\frac{I_{bias}}{2}\,\Delta R_D .$$
  6. Refer that error back to the input. Dividing by the differential gain $A_d=g_m R_D$ and substituting $g_m = 2I_D/V_{ov} = I_{bias}/V_{ov}$ collapses the load resistance out of the problem entirely: $$V_{OS}=\frac{|v_O|}{A_d}=\frac{(I_{bias}/2)\Delta R_D}{g_m R_D}=\frac{V_{ov}}{2}\,\frac{\Delta R_D}{R_D}.$$ With a 2 per cent mismatch, $$\boxed{V_{OS}=\frac{0.2236\ \text{V}}{2}\times 0.02 = 2.24\ \text{mV}}$$ The result depends only on the overdrive and the fractional mismatch, which is why low-offset pairs are biased at small $V_{ov}$.
  7. Part (c) — refer a threshold mismatch to the input. A threshold mismatch already lives in the gate–source loop, so it needs no gain to refer it: if $M_1$ and $M_2$ differ by $\Delta V_{TH}$, an equal and opposite differential input restores balance exactly. A 2 per cent mismatch on a 1 V threshold is $\Delta V_{TH}=0.02\times 1\ \text{V}=20$ mV, hence $$\boxed{V_{OS}=\Delta V_{TH}=20\ \text{mV}}$$ This term is nearly an order of magnitude larger than the resistor term of part (b), and it does not improve with bias current — threshold matching, not resistor matching, is what limits the offset of this pair.
QuantitySymbolResult
Device transconductance parameter$K=\mu C_{ox}(W/L)$400 µA/V2
Quiescent drain current per side$I_{D1}=I_{D2}$10 µA
Quiescent overdrive$V_{ov}$0.2236 V
Quiescent gate–source voltages$V_{GS1}=V_{GS2}$1.224 V
Transconductances$g_{m1}=g_{m2}$89.4 µA/V
Gate–source voltages at full switching$v_{GS1}$, $v_{GS2}$1.316 V, 1.000 V
Differential input for full switching$v_{ID}$±0.316 V
Input offset from 2 per cent $R_D$ mismatch$V_{OS}$2.24 mV
Input offset from 2 per cent $V_{TH}$ mismatch$V_{OS}$20 mV
← Paper overview