Question 1 of 5: MOS Differential Amplifier — Bias, Transconductance, Full Current Switching and Input Offset
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, December 2019 — 16-Elec-B5
Advanced Electronics. Three hours; CLOSED BOOK, an approved Casio or Sharp
calculator permitted. Five questions, ALL to be answered, 20 marks each. Op-amps are
ideal and the supplies are ±15 V unless a question states otherwise; in
schematics ground and chassis are common. Where a question leaves an interpretation
open, the paper's own Note 1 invites the candidate to state the assumption inside the
answer — every such assumption below is flagged in a check callout.
Reference texts. A. S. Sedra and K. C. Smith, Microelectronic
Circuits, 8th ed. — Ch. 7 (transistor amplifiers and biasing), Ch. 8
(differential and multistage amplifiers, offset voltage), Ch. 10 (frequency response,
short-circuit time constants), Ch. 11 (output stages and power amplifiers), Ch. 12
(feedback topologies). B. Razavi, Fundamentals of Microelectronics, 2nd ed.,
Ch. 8 (operational amplifier as a black box, non-linear feedback elements) and
Ch. 10 (differential amplifiers). P. Gray, P. Hurst, S. Lewis and R. Meyer,
Analysis and Design of Analog Integrated Circuits, 5th ed., Ch. 3
(single-transistor amplifiers) and Ch. 8 (feedback).
Check — the paper's own MOSFET convention.
The formula sheet printed with Question 1 defines the saturation current as
$i_{DS}=\tfrac12 K\,(v_{GS}-V_{TH})^2$ with $K=K'(W/L)=\mu C_{ox}(W/L)$, and that
convention is used throughout Questions 1 and 5. Question 2 is the one place where it
does not close: with $K=1\ \text{mA/V}^2$ and $V_{GS}=2$ V the sheet would give
$I_D=0.5$ mA, whereas the bias network of Question 2 fixes $I_D=1$ mA by three
independent routes (the gate divider, $V_S/R_S$, and the stated $V_D$). The bias data
therefore governs there, and the transconductance is taken as $g_m=2I_D/V_{ov}$,
which is convention-free. Both readings are quoted in Question 2, Step 2.
Question 1: MOS Differential Amplifier — Bias, Transconductance, Full Current Switching and Input Offset (20 marks)
Find. The quiescent gate–source voltages and transconductances of
$M_1$ and $M_2$, the differential input that switches the whole tail current into one
side, and the input offset voltage produced first by a 2 per cent load-resistor mismatch
and then by a 2 per cent threshold mismatch.
Figure 1.1 — The resistively loaded n-channel differential pair of Question 1. The tail source $I_{bias}$ sets the total current; at balance it divides equally, and the differential output $v_o$ is taken between the two drains.
Approach. Work the quiescent point first from the square-law
saturation model at $I_{D}=I_{bias}/2$ per side, then obtain the full-switching input
from the condition that one device carries the entire tail current while the other sits
exactly at cut-off; the two offset parts follow by asking what differential input
restores a balanced output when one parameter is perturbed.
Part (a) — collapse the process data into one device constant.
The formula sheet defines the device transconductance parameter as
$$K = \mu C_{ox}\left(\frac{W}{L}\right) = 20\ \frac{\mu\text{A}}{\text{V}^2}\times\frac{120\ \mu\text{m}}{6\ \mu\text{m}} = 20\times 20 = 400\ \mu\text{A/V}^2 .$$
Because both transistors are drawn identically and share the same threshold, this single
number describes each side of the pair.
Split the tail current and solve for the overdrive. With
$v_{I1}=v_{I2}$ the pair is balanced, the two sources sit at a common potential, and each
device carries half the tail current, $I_{D1}=I_{D2}=I_{bias}/2 = 10\ \mu\text{A}$.
Inverting the saturation law $I_D=\tfrac12 K V_{ov}^2$ gives
$$V_{ov}=\sqrt{\frac{2I_D}{K}}=\sqrt{\frac{2\,(10\ \mu\text{A})}{400\ \mu\text{A/V}^2}}=\sqrt{0.05}=0.2236\ \text{V}.$$
Adding the threshold gives the quiescent gate–source voltage of each device,
$$\boxed{V_{GS1}=V_{GS2}=V_{TH}+V_{ov}=1+0.2236=1.224\ \text{V}}$$
Evaluate the small-signal transconductance of each device.
Differentiating the same square law, $g_m=\partial i_D/\partial v_{GS}=K V_{ov}$, and the
three equivalent forms all agree, which is the free check on Step 2:
$$\begin{aligned}
g_m &= K V_{ov} = (400\ \mu\text{A/V}^2)(0.2236\ \text{V}) = 89.44\ \mu\text{A/V},\\
g_m &= \frac{2I_D}{V_{ov}} = \frac{2\,(10\ \mu\text{A})}{0.2236\ \text{V}} = 89.44\ \mu\text{A/V},\\
g_m &= \sqrt{2KI_D} = \sqrt{2(400)(10)}\ \mu\text{A/V} = 89.44\ \mu\text{A/V}.
\end{aligned}$$
Hence $\boxed{g_{m1}=g_{m2}=89.4\ \mu\text{A/V}=0.0894\ \text{mA/V}}$ — a small
number, as it must be for a 10 µA tail per side.
Impose full current switching and read off the differential input.
Full switching means one device takes the entire tail current and the other is exactly at
cut-off. Taking $I_1=I_{bias}$ and $I_2=0$: the conducting device now needs an overdrive
$\sqrt{2I_{bias}/K}$, while the cut-off device sits at $v_{GS2}=V_{TH}$ with no overdrive
at all. Since both sources share one node, the differential input is the difference of the
two gate–source voltages,
$$v_{ID}=v_{GS1}-v_{GS2}=\left(V_{TH}+\sqrt{\frac{2I_{bias}}{K}}\right)-V_{TH}=\sqrt{\frac{2\,(20\ \mu\text{A})}{400\ \mu\text{A/V}^2}}=\sqrt{0.1}=0.3162\ \text{V}.$$
Numerically $v_{GS1}=1.316$ V and $v_{GS2}=1.000$ V at that instant. Note the compact
form: $\sqrt{2I_{bias}/K}=\sqrt{2}\,V_{ov}$, so
$$\boxed{v_{ID}=\pm\sqrt{2}\,V_{ov}=\pm 0.316\ \text{V}}$$
the sign selecting which side captures the current. The pair is therefore linear only
over a window of roughly $\pm 0.1$ V and is fully switched by about a third of a volt.
Part (b) — define the input offset produced by a load mismatch.
The input offset voltage is the differential input that must be applied to bring the
output back to zero when the circuit is not perfectly matched. With
$R_{D1}=R_D+\tfrac12\Delta R_D$ and $R_{D2}=R_D-\tfrac12\Delta R_D$ and the inputs tied
together, each drain carries $I_{bias}/2$, so the output error voltage is
$$v_O = \frac{I_{bias}}{2}\,(R_{D2}-R_{D1}) = -\frac{I_{bias}}{2}\,\Delta R_D .$$
Refer that error back to the input. Dividing by the differential gain
$A_d=g_m R_D$ and substituting $g_m = 2I_D/V_{ov} = I_{bias}/V_{ov}$ collapses the load
resistance out of the problem entirely:
$$V_{OS}=\frac{|v_O|}{A_d}=\frac{(I_{bias}/2)\Delta R_D}{g_m R_D}=\frac{V_{ov}}{2}\,\frac{\Delta R_D}{R_D}.$$
With a 2 per cent mismatch,
$$\boxed{V_{OS}=\frac{0.2236\ \text{V}}{2}\times 0.02 = 2.24\ \text{mV}}$$
The result depends only on the overdrive and the fractional mismatch, which is why
low-offset pairs are biased at small $V_{ov}$.
Part (c) — refer a threshold mismatch to the input. A threshold
mismatch already lives in the gate–source loop, so it needs no gain to refer it: if
$M_1$ and $M_2$ differ by $\Delta V_{TH}$, an equal and opposite differential input
restores balance exactly. A 2 per cent mismatch on a 1 V threshold is
$\Delta V_{TH}=0.02\times 1\ \text{V}=20$ mV, hence
$$\boxed{V_{OS}=\Delta V_{TH}=20\ \text{mV}}$$
This term is nearly an order of magnitude larger than the resistor term of part (b), and
it does not improve with bias current — threshold matching, not resistor matching,
is what limits the offset of this pair.