22-Elec-B7 Power Systems Engineering · December 2013
Question 6 of 7: Sequence Networks and Single Line-to-Ground Faults
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams,
December 2013 — 07-Elec-B7 Power Systems Engineering. Open-book,
three hours, any non-communicating calculator permitted. Seven problems of equal
value (20 points each); any five constitute a complete paper and only the first
five appearing in the answer book are marked. All seven are solved here,
because the set is a study resource.
Reference texts.
M. E. El-Hawary, Electrical Power Systems: Design and Analysis,
rev. ed., IEEE Press/Wiley — the notation this paper uses throughout
(the ABCD two-port, the salient-pole power-angle expressions, the sequence
networks and the equal-area criterion).
J. D. Glover, T. J. Overbye and M. S. Sarma, Power System Analysis and
Design, 6th ed., Cengage — transmission-line parameters and the exact
long line (Ch. 4–5), power flow (Ch. 6), symmetrical faults (Ch. 7),
symmetrical components and unsymmetrical faults (Ch. 8–9), transient
stability (Ch. 11).
J. J. Grainger and W. D. Stevenson, Power System Analysis,
McGraw-Hill — three-winding transformers, sequence networks and the
bus-impedance method.
S. J. Chapman, Electric Machinery Fundamentals, 5th ed.,
McGraw-Hill — transformers (Ch. 2) and synchronous machines
(Ch. 4–5).
Canadian practice: CSA C22.3 No. 1 Overhead Systems, CAN/CSA-C88
and CSA C50 (power transformers and insulating oil), and IEEE C37.91 as adopted
by Canadian utilities for transformer protection.
Problem 6: Sequence Networks and Single Line-to-Ground Faults (20 points)
Given. The Figure (4) system — G1 – T1
– bus 1 – L1 – bus 2 – L2 – bus 3 – T2
– G2 — with T1 delta on the machine side and grounded wye (through
switch S) on the bus-1 side, and T2 grounded wye on the bus-3 side and delta on
the machine side.
Table (2) — component reactances in per unit
Sequence
Generators $G_1$, $G_2$
Transformers $T_1$, $T_2$
Lines $L_1$, $L_2$
Positive $X_+$
0.200
0.275
0.225
Negative $X_-$
0.150
0.275
0.225
Zero $X_0$
0.050
0.275
0.225
Find. The three sequence networks, then the phase-A fault
current for a single line-to-ground fault at bus 2 with S closed and with S
open, and the current for a three-phase fault at bus 2.
Parts (a) and (b): the three sequence networks with switch S closed. Positive and negative sequence have the same topology and differ only in the machine reactance (0.2 against 0.15) and in the absence of internal emf in the negative network. In the zero-sequence network both generators are cut off by the delta windings, so the only paths to the reference are through the two grounded-wye transformer neutrals.
Approach. Build each sequence network from the
one-line diagram — the transformer winding connections alone decide the
zero-sequence topology — reduce each to a single reactance at bus 2, then
connect the three networks in series for the single line-to-ground fault and use
the positive network alone for the three-phase fault.
Part (a) — build the positive-sequence network.
Every element appears in series along its path, and each generator drives its
own internal emf of 1.0 pu behind its positive-sequence reactance. From bus 2,
the two sides are identical chains:
$$X_{+,\text{left}}=x_{G}+x_{T1}+x_{L1}=0.200+0.275+0.225=0.700\ \text{pu},$$
and the right-hand chain through $L_2$, $T_2$ and $G_2$ has the same three
values. The two are in parallel at bus 2, so
$$\boxed{X_1=\tfrac12(0.700)=0.350\ \text{pu}}$$
Build the negative-sequence network the same way. The
topology is identical; only the machine reactance changes, and there is no
internal emf because a balanced generator produces only positive-sequence
voltage:
$$X_{-,\text{each side}}=0.150+0.275+0.225=0.650\ \text{pu},$$
$$\boxed{X_2=\tfrac12(0.650)=0.325\ \text{pu}}$$
Part (b) — build the zero-sequence network from the winding
connections. Zero-sequence current is in phase in all three conductors,
so it needs a return path through earth. A delta winding provides a closed path
for zero-sequence current to circulate but none for it to leave the
winding, so it acts as an open circuit to the rest of the network; a
grounded-wye winding connects to the reference bus through its neutral. Here
both $T_1$ and $T_2$ have their delta on the machine side, so both
generators are isolated from the zero-sequence network entirely, and the
only connections to the reference are the two transformer neutrals — T1's
through the switch S, T2's solidly.
Reduce the zero-sequence network with S closed. From bus 2
the left path is line $L_1$ then $T_1$ to reference, and the right path is line
$L_2$ then $T_2$ to reference:
$$X_{0,\text{left}}=x_{L1,0}+x_{T1,0}=0.225+0.275=0.500\ \text{pu} = X_{0,\text{right}},$$
$$\boxed{X_0=\tfrac12(0.500)=0.250\ \text{pu (S closed)}}$$
Part (c) — connect the three networks in series for the
single line-to-ground fault. A bolted single line-to-ground fault on
phase A imposes $I_b=I_c=0$ and $V_a=0$, which forces the three sequence
currents to be equal and the three networks into series:
$$I_{a1}=I_{a2}=I_{a0}=\frac{E}{j(X_1+X_2+X_0)}=\frac{1.0}{j(0.350+0.325+0.250)}=\frac{1.0}{j0.925}=1.0811\angle-90^\circ.$$
Sum the sequence components to get the phase current.
Since $I_a=I_{a1}+I_{a2}+I_{a0}=3I_{a1}$,
$$\boxed{I_{a}=\frac{3(1.0)}{j0.925}=3.2432\angle-90^\circ\ \text{pu (S closed)}}$$
Part (d) — open the switch and rebuild the zero-sequence
network. With S open, T1's neutral no longer reaches the reference, so
the entire left branch of the zero-sequence network is dead and the only path
left is through $L_2$ and $T_2$:
$$X_0'=0.225+0.275=0.500\ \text{pu},$$
$$\boxed{I_{a}'=\frac{3(1.0)}{j(0.350+0.325+0.500)}=\frac{3}{j1.175}=2.5532\angle-90^\circ\ \text{pu}}$$
State the effect of the transformer grounding. Opening S
raises the zero-sequence reactance from 0.250 to 0.500 pu and drops the
ground-fault current from 3.243 to 2.553 pu, a reduction of 21.3 %. That is the
general result and the general design trade-off: more grounded-wye
neutrals means a stiffer zero-sequence source, hence higher ground-fault duty on
the breakers but also a well-defined neutral, ground-fault current large enough
for ground relays to see reliably, and neutral-to-earth voltage on the healthy
phases held near normal. Fewer grounded neutrals reduces the fault duty
but pushes the healthy-phase voltages towards $\sqrt3$ times normal during a
ground fault and can leave the ground fault too small to detect. Canadian
transmission practice is effectively grounded systems
($X_0/X_1\le3$, $R_0/X_1\le1$), obtained by grounding enough transformer
neutrals; distribution feeders are multi-grounded on the same reasoning.
Note also that a single line-to-ground fault here draws more current
than a three-phase fault (step 9), which is the signature of a strongly grounded
system with $X_0\lt X_1$.
Part (e) — use the positive network alone for the three-phase
fault. A balanced three-phase fault produces no negative- or
zero-sequence current at all, so only $X_1$ appears:
$$\boxed{I_F=\frac{1.0}{jX_1}=\frac{1.0}{j0.350}=2.8571\angle-90^\circ\ \text{pu}}$$
The switch position is irrelevant to this answer, because no zero-sequence
current flows in a balanced fault.
Quantity
Symbol
Result
Positive-sequence reactance at bus 2
$X_1$
0.350 pu
Negative-sequence reactance at bus 2
$X_2$
0.325 pu
Zero-sequence reactance, S closed
$X_0$
0.250 pu
Zero-sequence reactance, S open
$X_0'$
0.500 pu
SLG fault current, S closed
$I_a$
$3.2432\angle-90^\circ$ pu
SLG fault current, S open
$I_a'$
$2.5532\angle-90^\circ$ pu
Reduction on opening S
—
21.3 %
Three-phase fault current
$I_F$
$2.8571\angle-90^\circ$ pu
Part (c): for a bolted single line-to-ground fault the three sequence networks connect in SERIES, which is what makes I₀ equal to I₁ and gives I = 3I₁. Opening switch S doubles the third element from 0.250 to 0.500 pu.