NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Elec-B7 Power Systems Engineering · May 2013

Question 4 of 7: Bus Classification and a Three-Bus Power Flow

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, May 2013 — 07-Elec-B7 Power Systems Engineering. Open-book, three hours, non-communicating calculator permitted. Seven problems of equal value (20 points each); any five constitute a complete paper and only the first five appearing in the answer book are marked. All seven are solved here, because the set is a study resource.

Reference texts.

Problem 4: Bus Classification and a Three-Bus Power Flow (20 points)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Part (a) — the three bus types. Each bus of a power-flow problem carries four quantities: the voltage magnitude $|V|$, the voltage angle $\delta$, the net real power injection $P$ and the net reactive power injection $Q$. Two of the four are specified as data and two are computed; which two are specified is what defines the bus type.

Bus typeAlso calledSpecifiedComputedPhysical meaning
Slackswing, reference$|V|,\ \delta$ (usually $1.0\angle 0^\circ$)$P,\ Q$the one machine that takes up the mismatch between generation, load and the as-yet-unknown network losses, and supplies the angle reference for the whole solution. Exactly one per island.
Voltage-controlled (PV)generator bus$P,\ |V|$$Q,\ \delta$a generator whose governor sets its output power and whose exciter/AVR holds its terminal voltage; the reactive output is whatever it takes, subject to the machine's Q limits.
Load (PQ)demand bus$P,\ Q$$|V|,\ \delta$a bus with a known demand and no voltage control — the great majority of buses. Injections are negative for a load.

Two practical riders complete the answer. A PV bus reverts to a PQ bus during the solution if its computed $Q$ hits a machine limit: $Q$ is then fixed at the limit and $|V|$ is released. And a bus with neither generation nor load (a pure junction or a switching station) is simply a PQ bus with $P = Q = 0$.

In the system of Figure 2 bus 1 is the slack bus ($V_1 = 1.0\angle 0^\circ$, $P_1$ and $Q_1$ unknown), bus 3 is a voltage-controlled generator bus whose solved state $V_3 = 1.05\angle 32^\circ$ is given here, and bus 2 is a load bus carrying $P_2 = -4$ pu with $|V_2|$ and $\delta_2$ to be found. The question hands us $\delta_2 = -8.5^\circ$, which converts the non-linear power-flow solution into a direct calculation.

1j0.08 pu2j0.2 pu3P2 = -4.0 puP1, Q1P3, Q3V1 = 1.0 at 0 degV3 = 1.05 at 32 degV2 = |V2| at angle delta2Three-bus system: bus 1 slack, bus 2 load, bus 3 generator
Figure 4.1 — the three-bus system of Figure (2). Lines are pure reactances, so all real power transfer is governed by the angle differences and all reactive transfer by the magnitude differences.

Given.

QuantityValueMeaning
$x_{12}$$0.08\ \text{pu}$bus 1 to bus 2 series reactance
$x_{23}$$0.20\ \text{pu}$bus 2 to bus 3 series reactance
$V_1$$1.00\angle 0^\circ\ \text{pu}$slack bus
$V_3$$1.05\angle 32^\circ\ \text{pu}$generator bus
$P_2$$-4.0\ \text{pu}$net real injection at bus 2 (a 4 pu load)
$\delta_2$$-8.5^\circ$given voltage angle at bus 2

Find. $|V_2|$ and $Q_2$, then the generation $P_1 + jQ_1$ and $P_3 + jQ_3$.

Approach. Write the standard polar power-flow injection equations for a purely reactive network; the $P_2$ equation is then linear in $|V_2|$ and solves in one line, after which every remaining quantity is an explicit evaluation.

  1. Specialise the injection equations to a lossless network. For a line of pure series reactance $x_{ik}$ the general polar forms $P_i=\sum_k |V_i||V_k|\left(G_{ik}\cos\delta_{ik}+B_{ik}\sin\delta_{ik}\right)$ and $Q_i=\sum_k |V_i||V_k|\left(G_{ik}\sin\delta_{ik}-B_{ik}\cos\delta_{ik}\right)$ collapse to $$P_i=\sum_{k\neq i}\frac{|V_i||V_k|}{x_{ik}}\sin\delta_{ik}, \qquad Q_i=\sum_{k\neq i}\left(\frac{|V_i|^{2}}{x_{ik}} -\frac{|V_i||V_k|}{x_{ik}}\cos\delta_{ik}\right)$$ with $\delta_{ik}=\delta_i-\delta_k$. Real power is carried by angle difference, reactive power by magnitude difference — the two decouple, which is the whole reason a fast-decoupled solver works.
  2. Solve the bus-2 real-power equation for the magnitude. Bus 2 connects only to buses 1 and 3, and $|V_2|$ factors out of both terms: $$P_2=|V_2|\left[\frac{|V_1|\sin(\delta_2-\delta_1)}{x_{12}} +\frac{|V_3|\sin(\delta_2-\delta_3)}{x_{23}}\right]$$ Evaluating the bracket with $\delta_2-\delta_1 = -8.5^\circ$ and $\delta_2-\delta_3 = -40.5^\circ$, $$\frac{1.00\sin(-8.5^\circ)}{0.08} +\frac{1.05\sin(-40.5^\circ)}{0.20} =-1.8459-3.4113=-5.2572$$ so $$|V_2|=\frac{-4.0}{-5.2572} \;\Longrightarrow\;\boxed{|V_2|=0.7609\ \text{pu}}$$
  3. Reactive injection at bus 2. Substituting the same angles and the magnitude just found into the $Q$ equation, $$Q_2=\frac{|V_2|^{2}}{x_{12}}+\frac{|V_2|^{2}}{x_{23}} -\frac{|V_2||V_1|\cos(\delta_2-\delta_1)}{x_{12}} -\frac{|V_2||V_3|\cos(\delta_2-\delta_3)}{x_{23}}$$ $$\boxed{Q_2=-2.3129\ \text{pu}}$$ The sign convention is injection, so a negative value means bus 2 absorbs 2.3129 pu of reactive power: the load is drawing about 0.58 pu of lagging vars for every 1 pu of real power, i.e. a power factor of roughly 0.87 lagging at that bus.
  4. Part (c) — generation at the slack bus. Bus 1 sees only bus 2, so $$P_1=\frac{|V_1||V_2|}{x_{12}}\sin(\delta_1-\delta_2) =\frac{1.00\times0.7609}{0.08}\sin(8.5^\circ) \;\Longrightarrow\;\boxed{P_1=1.4058\ \text{pu}}$$ $$Q_1=\frac{|V_1|^{2}}{x_{12}}-\frac{|V_1||V_2|}{x_{12}}\cos(\delta_1-\delta_2) =\frac{1}{0.08}-\frac{0.7609}{0.08}\cos(8.5^\circ) \;\Longrightarrow\;\boxed{Q_1=3.0937\ \text{pu}}$$ The slack machine is delivering nearly 3.1 pu of reactive power for 1.4 pu of real power — a consequence of the depressed voltage at bus 2, which forces the reactive support to come from both ends.
  5. Part (d) — generation at bus 3. Identically, with $\delta_3-\delta_2 = 40.5^\circ$ and $x_{23} = 0.20$, $$P_3=\frac{1.05\times0.7609}{0.20}\sin(40.5^\circ) \;\Longrightarrow\;\boxed{P_3=2.5942\ \text{pu}}$$ $$Q_3=\frac{1.05^{2}}{0.20}-\frac{1.05\times0.7609}{0.20} \cos(40.5^\circ) \;\Longrightarrow\;\boxed{Q_3=2.4751\ \text{pu}}$$
  6. Balance checks. The lines are lossless, so the real powers must sum to zero: $P_1+P_2+P_3 = 1.4058 - 4 + 2.5942 = 0.000000$ pu. The reactive powers must sum to the $I^{2}X$ absorbed by the two reactances: $$\sum Q=3.2559\ \text{pu} \quad\text{versus}\quad |I_{12}|^{2}x_{12}+|I_{32}|^{2}x_{23} =0.9238+2.3321 =3.2559\ \text{pu},$$ with $|I_{12}| = 3.3981$ pu and $|I_{32}| = 3.4148$ pu. Both balances close, which validates every number above.

Check: the solved $|V_2| = 0.7609$ pu is far outside any operating standard (a CSA/IEEE service voltage would be held within roughly 0.95–1.05 pu). That is a property of the data the question supplies, not an arithmetic error: a 4 pu load delivered over $j0.08$ and $j0.2$ pu with a fixed 40.5° angle spread simply cannot be supported at a healthy voltage. The balance checks in step 6 confirm the solution is internally exact. In a design study this bus would be flagged for reactive compensation.

PartQuantityResult
(b)Voltage magnitude at bus 2, $|V_2|$0.7609 pu
(b)Reactive injection at bus 2, $Q_2$-2.3129 pu (absorbed)
(c)Real power generated at bus 1, $P_1$1.4058 pu
(c)Reactive power generated at bus 1, $Q_1$3.0937 pu
(d)Real power generated at bus 3, $P_3$2.5942 pu
(d)Reactive power generated at bus 3, $Q_3$2.4751 pu
check$\sum P$ (lossless network)0.000000 pu
check$\sum Q$ against $I^2X$ absorbed3.2559 pu vs 3.2559 pu