22-Elec-B7 Power Systems Engineering · December 2015
Question 6 of 7: Per-Unit Sequence Networks and a Line-to-Line Fault Mid-Line
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, December 2015 — 07-Elec-B7 Power Systems Engineering. Open-book, 3 hours. Seven problems are printed; any five constitute a complete paper and all questions are of equal value (25 points each). All seven are solved in full below, because the set is a study resource rather than a timed sitting.
Reference texts. The syllabus for this code follows M. E. El-Hawary, Electrical Power Systems: Design and Analysis (IEEE Press) — the notation used throughout this paper (the cantilever transformer model, the ABCD two-port, the two-reaction salient-pole construction) is his. Corroborating references: J. D. Glover, M. S. Sarma and T. J. Overbye, Power System Analysis and Design, 6th ed.; J. Grainger and W. Stevenson, Power System Analysis; and, for the machine chapters, S. J. Chapman, Electric Machinery Fundamentals, 5th ed. Canadian practice references where grounding and protection are discussed: CSA C22.1 Canadian Electrical Code, Part I and CSA C22.3 No. 1 for overhead systems.
Check: two points read off the printed figures. (i) Figure (1) of Problem 4 prints the line admittance as y = −j10 pu, i.e. a series reactance of j0.10 pu. The negative sign is the physically correct one for an inductive line and is used here. (ii) In Figure (3-a) of Problem 6, transformer T2 carries its delta on the generator side and T1 carries its delta on the motor side; both line-side windings are wye with a solidly earthed neutral. That reading governs the zero-sequence network built in Problem 6(a).
Problem 6: Per-Unit Sequence Networks and a Line-to-Line Fault Mid-Line (25 points)
Find. All three sequence networks in per unit on the stated base, then the current in the faulted phases for a line-to-line fault between phases B and C at the mid-point of the transmission line.
Approach. Establish the voltage base in each of the
three zones from the transformer turns ratios, convert every reactance with
$X_{\text{new}}=X_{\text{old}}\left(\frac{S_{\text{new}}}{S_{\text{old}}}\right)
\left(\frac{V_{\text{old}}}{V_{\text{new}}}\right)^{2}$, build the networks, then
apply the line-to-line fault connection $I_{a1}=-I_{a2}=E/(X_1+X_2)$.
Part (a) — establish the voltage bases in all three
zones. The base is 25 MVA throughout and 11 kV on the generator side.
Crossing T2, whose ratio is 10.8 : 121, the line-side base becomes
$$V_{b,\text{line}}=11\times\frac{121}{10.8}=123.24\ \text{kV}$$
and crossing T1 back down, whose ratio is the same, the motor-side base returns
to $123.24\times\frac{10.8}{121}=11.00$ kV. The corresponding impedance bases are
$$Z_{b,\text{gen}}=\frac{11^{2}}{25}=4.84\ \Omega,\qquad
Z_{b,\text{line}}=\frac{123.24^{2}}{25}=607.53\ \Omega$$
Convert the machines and transformers. The generator is
rated at exactly the chosen base, so its reactance is unchanged at 0.20 pu. Each
transformer must be moved from 30 MVA and 10.8 kV to 25 MVA and 11 kV:
$$X_T=0.10\left(\frac{25}{30}\right)\left(\frac{10.8}{11}\right)^{2}=0.08033\ \text{pu}$$
The motors are rated at 10 kV, not the 11 kV base of their zone:
$$\begin{aligned}
X_{m1} &= 0.25\left(\frac{25}{15}\right)\left(\frac{10}{11}\right)^{2}=0.34435\ \text{pu}\\
X_{m2} &= 0.25\left(\frac{25}{7.5}\right)\left(\frac{10}{11}\right)^{2}=0.68871\ \text{pu}
\end{aligned}$$
and the line reactance converts by dividing by its own impedance base:
$$X_{\text{line}}=\frac{100}{607.53}=0.16460\ \text{pu}$$
Every one of these agrees with the figure to within its printed precision
(0.0805, 0.164, 0.345 and 0.69 respectively), which is what part (a)
asks to be verified.
Figure 6.1 — the positive-sequence network on the 25 MVA, 11 kV base, with the line split at the fault point F. The negative-sequence network is identical with the internal voltage sources removed.
Zero-sequence network, and why the printed machine data is a
decoy. The zero-sequence line reactance converts the same way,
$300/607.53=0.49380$ pu, and each half-line is $0.24690$ pu. The connections
now decide everything. Figure (3-a) shows T2 with its delta on the
generator side and T1 with its delta on the motor side, both line-side
windings being solidly earthed wye. A delta winding provides a circulating path
for zero-sequence current but passes none of it through, so it is an open
circuit looking from the machine and a short to the reference looking from the
line. Consequently both machines are cut out of the zero-sequence network
altogether: the 0.06 pu machine zero-sequence reactances and both 2.5 ohm
neutral reactors (which would have contributed $3Z_n/Z_b = 7.5/4.84 = 1.550$ pu)
never appear in any answer. The only paths to the reference are the two earthed
transformer neutrals:
$$X_0\ \text{at }F=\frac{0.24690+0.08033}{2}=0.16362\ \text{pu}$$
the two branches being equal because F is exactly mid-line.
Figure 6.2 — the zero-sequence network. Both delta windings isolate their machines, leaving only the two earthed transformer neutrals as paths to the reference bus.
Part (b) — reduce the positive-sequence network to the
fault point. Looking left from F: the generator, transformer T2 and half
the line in series,
$$X_{\text{left}}=0.20000+0.08033+0.08230=0.36263\ \text{pu}$$
Looking right: the two motors in parallel behind transformer T1 and the other
half-line,
$$X_{m1}\parallel X_{m2}=\frac{(0.34435)(0.68871)}{0.34435+0.68871}=0.22957\ \text{pu}$$
$$X_{\text{right}}=0.22957+0.08033+0.08230=0.39220\ \text{pu}$$
In parallel these give the Thevenin reactance at F:
$$\boxed{X_1=X_2=\frac{(0.36263)(0.39220)}{0.36263+0.39220}=0.18842\ \text{pu}}$$
$X_2$ equals $X_1$ because the negative-sequence network has the same branch
values with the sources shorted, and for these machines the negative-sequence
reactance is taken equal to the subtransient reactance.
Apply the line-to-line fault connection. A fault
between phases B and C involves no earth, so no zero-sequence current can flow
and $I_{a0}=0$; the positive- and negative-sequence networks are connected in
parallel opposition at the fault point, giving
$$I_{a1}=-I_{a2}=\frac{E}{j(X_1+X_2)}=\frac{1.0}{j(0.18842+0.18842)}
=\frac{1.0}{j0.37684}=2.6537\angle -90^{\circ}\ \text{pu}$$
The phase currents follow from the symmetrical-component synthesis with
$a=1\angle 120^{\circ}$:
$$I_b=a^{2}I_{a1}+aI_{a2}+I_{a0}=(a^{2}-a)I_{a1}=-j\sqrt3\,I_{a1}$$
so the magnitude of the current in each faulted phase is
$$|I_b|=|I_c|=\sqrt3\,(2.6537)=4.5963\ \text{pu}$$
and $I_a = 0$, as it must be for a phase-to-phase fault.
Convert to amperes at the fault point. The fault is on
the transmission line, so the relevant base current is the line-side one:
$$I_{b,\text{line}}=\frac{25\times10^{6}}{\sqrt3\,(123\,240)}=117.12\ \text{A}$$
$$\boxed{|I_b|=|I_c|=4.5963\times117.12=538.3\ \text{A}}$$
The result carries its own check: the three-phase fault at the same point would
be $1/X_1=5.3074$ pu, and the ratio of the two is
$4.5963/5.3074=0.866=\sqrt3/2$ exactly, which is the signature of a
line-to-line fault on a network where $X_1=X_2$.
Check: the figure’s rounded per-unit values against the exact ones. Figure (3-b) prints 0.0805 for each transformer where the exact conversion gives 0.08033, and 0.345 and 0.69 for the motors against 0.34435 and 0.68871. Rebuilding the whole calculation from the printed values gives a fault current of 538.2 A against the 538.3 A reported here — a difference of 0.02 per cent, so either set of numbers earns full marks. The exact values are used above.
Final Results.
Quantity
Value (25 MVA base)
Base voltage / impedance, line zone
123.24 kV / 607.53 Ω
Generator X″
0.2000 pu (unchanged)
Each transformer
0.08033 pu (figure: 0.0805)
Transmission line, positive sequence
0.16460 pu (figure: 0.164)
Motor 1 / Motor 2
0.34435 / 0.68871 pu (figure: 0.345 / 0.69)
Positive- and negative-sequence Thevenin at F
j0.18842 pu each
Zero-sequence Thevenin at F
j0.16362 pu (machines excluded by the delta windings)