18-Env-A3 Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Engineering · December 2013
Question 1 of 6: Proctor Compaction — Water Addition and Borrow Volume
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams — December 2013 — 04-Env-A3 / Geotechnical & Hydrogeological Engineering. 3 hours duration; open book exam, any non-communicating calculator permitted. The first five questions as they appear in the answer book are marked (20 marks each, 100 marks total); all six are solved below for completeness.
Reference texts. Braja M. Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (9th ed.) — unit weight/compaction relations, permeability and seepage/flow nets, lateral earth pressure and retaining-wall stability chapters; Craig & Knappett, Craig's Soil Mechanics (8th ed.) — cross-reference for the falling-head permeability test and flow-net construction under a cutoff wall; Freeze & Cherry, Groundwater (1979) — Darcy's law, confined-aquifer (Thiem) flow and seepage velocity.
Question 1: Proctor Compaction — Water Addition and Borrow Volume (20 marks)
Find. (a) additional weight of water per unit volume of compacted fill needed to raise the borrow soil to $w_{opt}$; (b) number of borrow-pit truckloads for the embankment.
Approach. Use the field dry unit weight target ($95\%$ of $\gamma_{d,max}$) as the "currency" of solids per unit volume: compare the water carried at the borrow moisture content against the water needed at $w_{opt}$ for that same mass of solids (part a), then use conservation of dry solids between the borrow pit's natural state and the compacted fill to size the required haul volume (part b).
Part (a) — dry unit weight required in the field. The fill must reach 95% of the maximum Proctor dry unit weight:
$$\gamma_{d,field}=0.95\,\gamma_{d,max}=0.95(19)=\boxed{18.05\ \text{kN/m}^3}.$$
This is also the weight of solids, $W_s$, contained in each cubic metre of compacted fill (by definition of dry unit weight).
Water carried per m³ of fill at each moisture content. Since $w=W_w/W_s$, the water weight per unit volume at a given $w$ is $W_w=w\,\gamma_{d,field}$:
$$W_{w,bp}=w_{bp}\,\gamma_{d,field}=(0.082)(18.05)=1.480\ \text{kN/m}^3,$$
$$W_{w,opt}=w_{opt}\,\gamma_{d,field}=(0.115)(18.05)=2.076\ \text{kN/m}^3.$$
Additional water required. The extra water that must be added to each cubic metre of PLACED fill to raise it from the borrow moisture to the optimum moisture is the difference:
$$\Delta W_w=W_{w,opt}-W_{w,bp}=2.076-1.480=\boxed{0.596\ \text{kN/m}^3}.$$
Part (b) — borrow volume needed via conservation of dry solids. The borrow pit's own dry unit weight (before any water is added or compaction is applied) is
$$\gamma_{d,bp}=\frac{\gamma_{bp}}{1+w_{bp}}=\frac{17.2}{1.082}=15.90\ \text{kN/m}^3.$$
The total weight of solids needed for the whole embankment is fixed by the compacted target, $W_{s,total}=\gamma_{d,field}\,V_{fill}=(18.05)(100{,}000)=1{,}805{,}000\ \text{kN}$. The SAME solids, before compaction, occupy a larger natural (borrow-pit) volume:
$$V_{borrow}=\frac{W_{s,total}}{\gamma_{d,bp}}=\frac{1{,}805{,}000}{15.90}=\boxed{113{,}547\ \text{m}^3}.$$
Truckloads. At 10 m³ per truck (borrow-state volume, before any water addition or compaction),
$$N_{trucks}=\frac{V_{borrow}}{10}=\frac{113{,}547}{10}=11{,}354.7\ \Rightarrow\ \boxed{11{,}355\ \text{truckloads}}\ \text{(rounded up).}$$
Check: assumes the 19 kN/m³ Proctor value reported is the maximum DRY unit weight (standard Proctor-curve convention, peak of the $\gamma_d$ vs. $w$ curve at $w_{opt}$), and that "per unit volume" in part (a) means per m³ of the finished (compacted) fill — the volume basis the 95%-compaction spec is written against. Water is assumed added at the borrow pit (or in a pugmill/windrow) before hauling and compacting; the truckload count in (b) is therefore of natural-moisture borrow material, not of the wetted-and-compacted product.