18-Env-A3 Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Engineering · December 2013
Question 6 of 6: Cantilever Retaining Wall — Tipping and Sliding Stability
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams — December 2013 — 04-Env-A3 / Geotechnical & Hydrogeological Engineering. 3 hours duration; open book exam, any non-communicating calculator permitted. The first five questions as they appear in the answer book are marked (20 marks each, 100 marks total); all six are solved below for completeness.
Reference texts. Braja M. Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (9th ed.) — unit weight/compaction relations, permeability and seepage/flow nets, lateral earth pressure and retaining-wall stability chapters; Craig & Knappett, Craig's Soil Mechanics (8th ed.) — cross-reference for the falling-head permeability test and flow-net construction under a cutoff wall; Freeze & Cherry, Groundwater (1979) — Darcy's law, confined-aquifer (Thiem) flow and seepage velocity.
Figure 4 — inverted-T cantilever wall: toe 0.5 m, stem 0.5 m thick, heel 3.0 m (total base B=4.0 m, matching 0.5+0.5+3.0); base 0.5 m thick; total height 5.0 m; front grade 2.0 m above the footing (embedment over the toe).
Given.
Given data
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Soil friction angle (effective)
$\phi$
38°
Soil cohesion
$c$
0
Soil unit weight
$\gamma_{soil}$
18 kN/m³
Concrete unit weight
$\gamma_{conc}$
24 kN/m³
Wall–soil (base) friction angle
$\delta$
25°
Total wall height (base bottom to stem top)
$H$
5.0 m
Base thickness / stem thickness
$t_{base},\,t_{stem}$
0.5 m / 0.5 m
Toe width / heel width
—
0.5 m / 3.0 m
Front-grade embedment over toe
$D_f$
2.0 m
Find. (a) factor of safety against tipping about the toe; (b) factor of safety against sliding along the base.
Approach. Use the Rankine active-pressure ("virtual back") method: compute the active force on a vertical plane through the back of the heel over the full retained height $H$, resolve the wall+soil system's self-weight into the base slab, stem, and the soil columns riding on the heel and on the toe, then take moments about the toe (tipping) and compare base friction to the active thrust (sliding).
Resolve the figure's dimensions. The base width B was printed as 4.0 m alongside 0.5 m (toe) + 0.5 m (stem) + 3.0 m (heel) = 4.0 m — a self-consistent set once the earlier extraction's mis-read "toe width" is corrected to what the drawing actually shows: a 2.0 m VERTICAL dimension (front-grade depth above the footing), not a fourth horizontal width. All four numbers below are taken directly from the printed figure. Stem height above the base, $H-t_{base}=5.0-0.5=4.5$ m.
Active earth pressure (Rankine, virtual back at the heel).
$$K_a=\frac{1-\sin\phi}{1+\sin\phi}=\frac{1-\sin38^\circ}{1+\sin38^\circ}=0.2379.$$
$$P_a=\tfrac{1}{2}K_a\gamma_{soil}H^2=\tfrac{1}{2}(0.2379)(18)(5.0)^2=\boxed{53.52\ \text{kN/m}},\quad\text{acting at }H/3=1.667\ \text{m above the base.}$$
Self-weight components (per metre of wall), moment arms measured from the toe's front (base) edge.
$$W_1(\text{base slab})=B\,t_{base}\gamma_{conc}=(4.0)(0.5)(24)=48.0\ \text{kN/m},\ \ x_1=2.0\ \text{m};$$
$$W_2(\text{stem})=t_{stem}(H-t_{base})\gamma_{conc}=(0.5)(4.5)(24)=54.0\ \text{kN/m},\ \ x_2=0.75\ \text{m};$$
$$W_3(\text{soil on heel})=(3.0)(4.5)(18)=243.0\ \text{kN/m},\ \ x_3=2.5\ \text{m};$$
$$W_4(\text{soil on toe, depth }D_f)=(0.5)(2.0)(18)=18.0\ \text{kN/m},\ \ x_4=0.25\ \text{m}.$$
$$N=\sum W_i=\boxed{363.0\ \text{kN/m}}.$$
Part (a) — factor of safety against tipping (moments about the toe).
$$M_{resist}=\sum W_i x_i=48.0(2.0)+54.0(0.75)+243.0(2.5)+18.0(0.25)=748.5\ \text{kN$\cdot$m/m},$$
$$M_{over}=P_a\left(\frac{H}{3}\right)=53.52(1.667)=89.21\ \text{kN$\cdot$m/m}.$$
$$FS_{tip}=\frac{M_{resist}}{M_{over}}=\frac{748.5}{89.21}=\boxed{8.39}.$$
(As a cross-check, the resultant lands only 0.18 m from the base centre — well inside the middle third, $B/6=0.67$ m — confirming no heel uplift, consistent with such a high $FS_{tip}$.)
Part (b) — factor of safety against sliding. With the water table 30 m down (no pore pressure at this shallow foundation) and using the base–soil friction angle $\delta=25^\circ$ (close to the common design guideline $\delta\approx\tfrac{2}{3}\phi=25.3^\circ$ for a cast-in-place base):
$$FS_{slide}=\frac{N\tan\delta}{P_a}=\frac{363.0\tan25^\circ}{53.52}=\boxed{3.16}.$$
This conservatively neglects any passive resistance from the 2.0 m of soil embedded in front of the toe (standard practice, since that soil is often disturbed by utility trenching or erosion over the wall's service life); including it, $P_p=\tfrac12 K_p\gamma_{soil}D_f^2=151.3$ kN/m would raise the estimate to $FS_{slide}\approx5.99$.
Check: the source page's printed "0.5 m / 0.5 m / 2.0 m / 3.0 m / 4.0 m" dimension set is internally inconsistent if the 2.0 m is read as a toe width (0.5+0.5+2.0+3.0=6.0 m ≠ 4.0 m headline, and also ≠ the 5.5 m a naive 2.0 m-toe reading would give against a mis-copied "4.0m" label); the printed figure shows the 2.0 m arrow is VERTICAL, labelling the depth of soil covering the toe, and the toe itself is 0.5 m wide — giving 0.5+0.5+3.0=4.0 m, exactly matching the printed total with no correction needed. Also assumed: level backfill with no surcharge on the heel, no soil surcharge beyond the 2.0 m embedment on the toe, and passive resistance excluded from the boxed sliding answer per the conservative convention above.
Quantity
Value
$K_a$
0.2379
Active thrust, $P_a$
53.52 kN/m
Total vertical load, $N$
363.0 kN/m
(a) FS against tipping
8.39
(b) FS against sliding
3.16 (5.99 if toe passive resistance is mobilised)