18-Env-A3 Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Engineering · December 2018
Question 3 of 6: Seepage Through a Zoned Earth Dam
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams — December 2018 — 18-Env-A3 / Geotechnical & Hydrogeological Engineering. 3 hours duration; open book exam, any non-communicating calculator permitted. FIVE (5) questions constitute a complete exam paper (the first five as they appear in the answer book are marked, 20 marks each, 100 marks total); all six printed questions are solved below for completeness.
Reference texts. Braja M. Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (9th ed.) — compaction, permeability and seepage, weight–volume relations; Craig & Knappett, Craig's Soil Mechanics (8th ed.) — flow nets and composite seepage barriers; Freeze & Cherry, Groundwater (1979) — Darcy's law, the Dupuit–Thiem equation and seepage velocity.
Question 3: Seepage Through a Zoned Earth Dam (20 marks)
Fig. Q3 — zoned earth dam: reservoir head H = 11.00 m, base segments 24 + 4 + 10 + 14 = 52 m, clay core is the full-height 10 m band between the dashed lines, toe drain at the downstream edge.
Given.
Given data
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Reservoir head above base
$H$
11.00 m
Base segments (heel→toe)
—
24, 4, 10, 14 m
Core thickness (horizontal, full height)
$L_{core}$
10 m
Crest length (normal to section)
$\ell$
50 m
Silty-loam hydraulic conductivity
$k_{shoulder}$
24 cm/d = 0.24 m/d
Clay-core hydraulic conductivity
$k_{core}$
1 mm/d = 0.001 m/d
Find. (a) seepage volume through the dam per day; (b) maximum seepage flow velocity through the dam.
Approach. The dashed lines in the figure show the core is a uniform, full-height (11 m) vertical band, 10 m thick, flanked by two tapering silty-loam shoulders. Because $k_{shoulder}/k_{core}=240$, the low-permeability core controls the seepage: treat it as the dominant resistance in the flow path (standard composite/zoned-dam idealisation) and apply Darcy's law across it directly, then confirm with a full series-resistance solve of all three zones.
Core geometry. The core spans the full dam height uniformly (it does not taper like the shoulders): flow area $A_{core}=H\times\ell=11.00\times50=550\ \text{m}^2$, path length $L_{core}=10\ \text{m}$.
Part (a) — core-controlled seepage. With $k_{shoulder}$ 240× larger than $k_{core}$, essentially the whole 11 m head is lost crossing the core, so Darcy's law applies directly across it: $$i_{core}=\frac{H}{L_{core}}=\frac{11.00}{10}=1.10,$$ $$Q=k_{core}\,i_{core}\,A_{core}=0.001\times1.10\times550=\boxed{0.605\ \text{m}^3/\text{day}}.$$
Rigour check — full series-resistance solve. Modelling the upstream wedge (24 m run + 4 m flat crest strip), the core, and the downstream wedge (14 m run) as three resistances in series, $R=L/(kA)$ with each zone's average cross-section, gives $R_{shoulder,total}\approx0.61$ day/m² against $R_{core}=18.18$ day/m² — the core alone carries 97% of the total resistance. Solving $Q=H/R_{total}$ over all three zones gives $Q=0.585\ \text{m}^3/\text{day}$, within 3.4% of the core-only value, confirming the shoulders' resistance is a small, safely-neglected correction.
Part (b) — maximum seepage velocity. By continuity the same $Q$ crosses every section along the flow path, so velocity is highest where the flow area is smallest and non-tapering — that is the core (the shoulders' average area is comparable but they pinch to zero only at the very heel/toe, a non-physical edge singularity, not a meaningful "maximum"). The Darcy (superficial) velocity through the core is $$v=\frac{Q}{A_{core}}=\frac{0.605}{550}=1.10\times10^{-3}\ \text{m/day}.$$ Converting to true (interstitial) seepage velocity with an assumed clay porosity $n_{core}\approx0.45$ (typical for compacted clay, Freeze & Cherry Table 2.4): $$v_s=\frac{v}{n_{core}}=\frac{1.10\times10^{-3}}{0.45}=\boxed{2.44\times10^{-3}\ \text{m/day}}.$$
Check: the core-controls idealisation (Q = 0.605 m³/day) is the primary answer; the full 3-zone series-resistance solve (0.585 m³/day) confirms it is high by only ~3.4%, well inside engineering tolerance for a hand flow-net estimate. Clay-core porosity $n=0.45$ is an assumed typical value (not given in the source) since the true seepage (interstitial) velocity depends on it; the Darcy (superficial) velocity of $1.10\times10^{-3}$ m/day does not depend on this assumption.