NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Env-A3 Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Engineering · December 2018

Question 3 of 6: Seepage Through a Zoned Earth Dam

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — December 2018 — 18-Env-A3 / Geotechnical & Hydrogeological Engineering. 3 hours duration; open book exam, any non-communicating calculator permitted. FIVE (5) questions constitute a complete exam paper (the first five as they appear in the answer book are marked, 20 marks each, 100 marks total); all six printed questions are solved below for completeness.

Reference texts. Braja M. Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (9th ed.) — compaction, permeability and seepage, weight–volume relations; Craig & Knappett, Craig's Soil Mechanics (8th ed.) — flow nets and composite seepage barriers; Freeze & Cherry, Groundwater (1979) — Darcy's law, the Dupuit–Thiem equation and seepage velocity.

Question 3: Seepage Through a Zoned Earth Dam (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Impermeable shale rock formation Core (clay) k = 1 mm/d Silty-loam (shoulder) k = 24 cm/d H = 11.00 m Drain 24 m 4 m 10 m 14 m
Fig. Q3 — zoned earth dam: reservoir head H = 11.00 m, base segments 24 + 4 + 10 + 14 = 52 m, clay core is the full-height 10 m band between the dashed lines, toe drain at the downstream edge.

Given.

Given data
QuantitySymbolValue
Reservoir head above base$H$11.00 m
Base segments (heel→toe)—24, 4, 10, 14 m
Core thickness (horizontal, full height)$L_{core}$10 m
Crest length (normal to section)$\ell$50 m
Silty-loam hydraulic conductivity$k_{shoulder}$24 cm/d = 0.24 m/d
Clay-core hydraulic conductivity$k_{core}$1 mm/d = 0.001 m/d

Find. (a) seepage volume through the dam per day; (b) maximum seepage flow velocity through the dam.

Approach. The dashed lines in the figure show the core is a uniform, full-height (11 m) vertical band, 10 m thick, flanked by two tapering silty-loam shoulders. Because $k_{shoulder}/k_{core}=240$, the low-permeability core controls the seepage: treat it as the dominant resistance in the flow path (standard composite/zoned-dam idealisation) and apply Darcy's law across it directly, then confirm with a full series-resistance solve of all three zones.

  1. Core geometry. The core spans the full dam height uniformly (it does not taper like the shoulders): flow area $A_{core}=H\times\ell=11.00\times50=550\ \text{m}^2$, path length $L_{core}=10\ \text{m}$.
  2. Part (a) — core-controlled seepage. With $k_{shoulder}$ 240× larger than $k_{core}$, essentially the whole 11 m head is lost crossing the core, so Darcy's law applies directly across it: $$i_{core}=\frac{H}{L_{core}}=\frac{11.00}{10}=1.10,$$ $$Q=k_{core}\,i_{core}\,A_{core}=0.001\times1.10\times550=\boxed{0.605\ \text{m}^3/\text{day}}.$$
  3. Rigour check — full series-resistance solve. Modelling the upstream wedge (24 m run + 4 m flat crest strip), the core, and the downstream wedge (14 m run) as three resistances in series, $R=L/(kA)$ with each zone's average cross-section, gives $R_{shoulder,total}\approx0.61$ day/m² against $R_{core}=18.18$ day/m² — the core alone carries 97% of the total resistance. Solving $Q=H/R_{total}$ over all three zones gives $Q=0.585\ \text{m}^3/\text{day}$, within 3.4% of the core-only value, confirming the shoulders' resistance is a small, safely-neglected correction.
  4. Part (b) — maximum seepage velocity. By continuity the same $Q$ crosses every section along the flow path, so velocity is highest where the flow area is smallest and non-tapering — that is the core (the shoulders' average area is comparable but they pinch to zero only at the very heel/toe, a non-physical edge singularity, not a meaningful "maximum"). The Darcy (superficial) velocity through the core is $$v=\frac{Q}{A_{core}}=\frac{0.605}{550}=1.10\times10^{-3}\ \text{m/day}.$$ Converting to true (interstitial) seepage velocity with an assumed clay porosity $n_{core}\approx0.45$ (typical for compacted clay, Freeze & Cherry Table 2.4): $$v_s=\frac{v}{n_{core}}=\frac{1.10\times10^{-3}}{0.45}=\boxed{2.44\times10^{-3}\ \text{m/day}}.$$
Check: the core-controls idealisation (Q = 0.605 m³/day) is the primary answer; the full 3-zone series-resistance solve (0.585 m³/day) confirms it is high by only ~3.4%, well inside engineering tolerance for a hand flow-net estimate. Clay-core porosity $n=0.45$ is an assumed typical value (not given in the source) since the true seepage (interstitial) velocity depends on it; the Darcy (superficial) velocity of $1.10\times10^{-3}$ m/day does not depend on this assumption.
QuantityValue
(a) Seepage volume through the dam0.605 m³/day (0.585 m³/day, full series check)
(b) Darcy velocity through the core1.10×10⁻³ m/day
(b) Maximum seepage (interstitial) velocity2.44×10⁻³ m/day