NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Env-A3 Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Engineering · December 2018

Question 6 of 6: Landfill Leachate Collection Through a Clay Liner

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — December 2018 — 18-Env-A3 / Geotechnical & Hydrogeological Engineering. 3 hours duration; open book exam, any non-communicating calculator permitted. FIVE (5) questions constitute a complete exam paper (the first five as they appear in the answer book are marked, 20 marks each, 100 marks total); all six printed questions are solved below for completeness.

Reference texts. Braja M. Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (9th ed.) — compaction, permeability and seepage, weight–volume relations; Craig & Knappett, Craig's Soil Mechanics (8th ed.) — flow nets and composite seepage barriers; Freeze & Cherry, Groundwater (1979) — Darcy's law, the Dupuit–Thiem equation and seepage velocity.

Question 6: Landfill Leachate Collection Through a Clay Liner (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Refuse Leachate ponded, 0.5 m Top clay liner, 1 m thick k = 2.1×10⁻⁸ cm/s, n = 10% Gravel collection layer Bottom clay liner 1 m
Fig. Q6 — landfill leachate collection system: 0.5 m ponded leachate over a 1 m clay liner, gravel collection layer with collector pipes below, bottom clay liner protecting groundwater.

Given.

Given data
QuantitySymbolValue
Ponded leachate depth—0.5 m
Top liner thickness$L$1 m
Liner hydraulic conductivity$K$2.1×10⁻⁸ cm/s
Landfill base area$A$5000 m²
Liner porosity$n$10%

Find. (a) annual volume of leachate collected through the top liner; (b) time for leachate to penetrate the 1 m top liner.

Approach. The gravel layer beneath the liner drains freely (zero pressure head at its top), so the full ponding depth plus the liner thickness acts as the driving head over the liner's own thickness; apply Darcy's law for the flow rate and the seepage (interstitial) velocity for the penetration time.

  1. Hydraulic gradient across the liner. Head loss = ponding depth + liner thickness (free-draining gravel below): $$i=\frac{0.5+1.0}{1.0}=1.5.$$
  2. Part (a) — annual collected volume. Darcy flux, converting $K$ to m/s first ($2.1\times10^{-8}\ \text{cm/s}=2.1\times10^{-10}\ \text{m/s}$): $$q=Ki=2.1\times10^{-10}\times1.5=3.15\times10^{-10}\ \text{m/s}.$$ Multiplying by area and seconds per year ($365\times86{,}400=3.154\times10^7\ \text{s}$): $$Q_{yr}=q\,A\,(3.154\times10^7)=3.15\times10^{-10}\times5000\times3.154\times10^7=\boxed{49.7\ \text{m}^3/\text{year}}.$$
  3. Part (b) — seepage velocity through the liner. The interstitial (true) velocity governs how fast leachate actually migrates through the pore space: $$v_s=\frac{q}{n}=\frac{3.15\times10^{-10}}{0.10}=3.15\times10^{-9}\ \text{m/s}.$$
  4. Penetration time. $$t=\frac{L}{v_s}=\frac{1.0}{3.15\times10^{-9}}=3.17\times10^{8}\ \text{s} = \boxed{10.1\ \text{years}}.$$
Check: the annual volume (a) uses the Darcy (superficial) flux over the full liner area, while the penetration time (b) needs the faster, porosity-corrected seepage velocity through the actual pore channels — conflating the two would understate the travel speed by the factor $1/n=10\times$.
QuantityValue
Hydraulic gradient across liner1.5
(a) Annual leachate volume collected49.7 m³/year
(b) Seepage velocity through liner3.15×10⁻⁹ m/s
(b) Time to penetrate the liner10.1 years
Back to the paper →