NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Env-B5 Industrial & Hazardous Waste Management · May 2018

Question 10 of 14: Mixed Waste Density, Dry-Basis Arsenic, and TCLP Toxicity

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Reference texts: LaGrega, Buckingham & Evans, Hazardous Waste Management, 2nd ed.; Nemerow & Dasgupta, Industrial and Hazardous Waste Treatment, 2nd ed.; Metcalf & Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th ed.; Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering, 6th ed.; Cooper & Alley, Air Pollution Control: A Design Approach; CCME, Guidelines for the Management of Biomedical Waste in Canada (1992); Ontario Environmental Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.19 and O. Reg. 347 (Waste Management – General); Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act, 1992 (Canada) and Regulations; Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), 1999.

Question 10: Mixed Waste Density, Dry-Basis Arsenic, and TCLP Toxicity (15 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

Waste% by weightDensity (kg/m3)Moisture contentArsenic (mg/kg-wet)
A75%30020%110
B25%21040%55

TCLP regulatory limit for arsenic $= 2.5$ mg/L; TCLP liquid-to-solid ratio (EPA Method 1311) $= 20$ L extraction fluid per kg dry solid.

Find. (a) mixed waste density; (b) dry-basis arsenic concentration of the mixture; (c) whether the mixture is a leachate-toxic waste for arsenic.

Approach. Work on a 100 kg basis of the total wet mixture. Split into wet masses of A and B by weight fraction, convert each to a volume (via its own density) to get the mixed density; separately convert each to dry solids mass (via $1-\text{MC}$) and combine the arsenic mass (from the wet-basis concentration) to get the dry-basis concentration; then estimate the TCLP leachate concentration from the standard 20:1 liquid-to-solid extraction ratio and compare to the regulatory limit.

  1. Wet mass of each waste (100 kg total basis). $$m_A = 100\times0.75 = 75\ \text{kg}, \qquad m_B = 100\times0.25 = 25\ \text{kg}$$
  2. Volume of each waste, from its own density. $$V_A = \frac{75}{300} = 0.250\ \text{m}^3, \qquad V_B = \frac{25}{210} = 0.1190\ \text{m}^3$$
  3. Mixed waste density. Total mass over total volume: $$\rho_{mix} = \frac{m_A+m_B}{V_A+V_B} = \frac{100}{0.250+0.1190} = \frac{100}{0.3690} = \boxed{271\ \text{kg/m}^3}$$
  4. Dry solids mass of each waste. $$m_{A,dry} = 75\times(1-0.20) = 60\ \text{kg}, \qquad m_{B,dry} = 25\times(1-0.40) = 15\ \text{kg}$$ $$m_{dry,total} = 60+15 = 75\ \text{kg}$$
  5. Total arsenic mass. The arsenic concentrations are given per kg of WET waste, so apply them to the wet masses: $$M_{As} = (75\times110) + (25\times55) = 8250+1375 = 9625\ \text{mg}$$
  6. Dry-basis arsenic concentration. Divide the total arsenic mass by the total DRY solids mass: $$C_{As,dry} = \frac{9625\ \text{mg}}{75\ \text{kg}} = \boxed{128.3\ \text{mg/kg-dry}}$$
  7. TCLP leachate arsenic concentration. Assuming all the arsenic present is available to leach into the standard 20:1 (L extraction fluid : kg dry solid) TCLP extraction: $$C_{leachate} = \frac{M_{As}}{20\times m_{dry,total}} = \frac{9625}{20\times75} = \frac{9625}{1500} = \boxed{6.42\ \text{mg/L}}$$
  8. Compare to the regulatory limit. $$6.42\ \text{mg/L} > 2.5\ \text{mg/L}\ \Rightarrow\ \boxed{\text{the mixture IS a leachate-toxic waste for arsenic}}$$
Final results
QuantityValue
(a) Mixed waste density271 kg/m3
(b) Dry-basis arsenic concentration128.3 mg/kg-dry
Estimated TCLP leachate concentration6.42 mg/L
(c) Leachate-toxic (TCLP) classificationYes — 6.42 mg/L > 2.5 mg/L limit
Check: assumes 100% of the measured arsenic mass is available to the TCLP extraction fluid at the standard 20:1 liquid:solid ratio (a conservative, standard estimating approach) — the actual regulatory determination requires running the physical TCLP procedure rather than this mass-balance estimate, but the large margin above the 2.5 mg/L limit (more than 2.5×) makes the qualitative classification robust to that simplification.