18-Env-B5 Industrial & Hazardous Waste Management · May 2018
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Reference texts: LaGrega, Buckingham & Evans, Hazardous Waste Management, 2nd ed.; Nemerow & Dasgupta, Industrial and Hazardous Waste Treatment, 2nd ed.; Metcalf & Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th ed.; Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering, 6th ed.; Cooper & Alley, Air Pollution Control: A Design Approach; CCME, Guidelines for the Management of Biomedical Waste in Canada (1992); Ontario Environmental Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.19 and O. Reg. 347 (Waste Management – General); Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act, 1992 (Canada) and Regulations; Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), 1999.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Microorganisms are classified by where they obtain carbon (for cell synthesis) and energy (for metabolism). Chemoheterotrophs obtain both from the oxidation of organic compounds — unlike chemoautotrophs (carbon from CO2, energy from inorganic oxidation) or photoautotrophs/photoheterotrophs (energy from light). Because the great majority of soil and groundwater contaminants targeted by bioremediation — petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, PAHs, phenolics, pesticides — are themselves organic compounds, a chemoheterotroph can use the contaminant directly as BOTH its carbon source and its energy (electron donor) source in a single metabolic step, which is exactly the reaction that destroys the contaminant.
Chemoheterotrophic bacteria also bring the metabolic versatility bioremediation needs in the field: they can respire aerobically (using O2 as the terminal electron acceptor, the fastest and most complete degradation pathway), anaerobically (using nitrate, sulfate, iron, or CO2 as alternate electron acceptors where oxygen is depleted, as in a landfill or a deep groundwater plume), or by fermentation, and their broad enzyme systems (oxygenases, dehalogenases, and others) let many of them co-metabolize xenobiotic compounds that are not themselves a primary growth substrate. This combination — the contaminant serving directly as food, and a metabolic pathway available under whatever redox conditions the site actually presents — is why chemoheterotrophs, rather than autotrophs or photosynthetic organisms, are the dominant and most exploited group in engineered and natural bioremediation.
Because chemoheterotrophs typically already exist at a contaminated site (having colonized it naturally, often at low population densities limited by nutrients or electron acceptors rather than by absence of the right organism), most engineered bioremediation strategies are biostimulation — supplying oxygen, nitrogen/phosphorus, or an alternate electron acceptor to accelerate the indigenous population — rather than bioaugmentation (introducing a foreign organism). This is a direct practical consequence of chemoheterotrophy being so metabolically common: a suitable degrader population is usually already present, and the engineering task is removing whatever nutrient or redox constraint is holding its growth rate back.