NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

21-Mat-A2 Materials Transport Phenomena · December 2013

Question 4 of 9: Liquid-Metal Plug Flow Over a Flat Plate — Penetration-Theory Derivation

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — December 2013 — Met-A2, Metallurgical Rate Phenomena. Three-hour, closed-book exam using an approved (Casio or Sharp) calculator, one double-sided aid sheet permitted; candidates were told to state any interpretive assumptions. Candidates answer Question 1 plus any four of Questions 2–9 — all nine are solved below for completeness. All questions are of equal value (20 marks each, five questions = 100%).

Reference texts: Geankoplis, C. J., Transport Processes and Separation Process Principles — mass/heat/momentum transfer fundamentals (Fick's/Newton's/Fourier's laws, boundary-layer correlations); Szekely, J. & Themelis, N. J., Rate Phenomena in Process Metallurgy — gas-halo diffusion, ladle/tundish fluid flow, wire injection; Turkdogan, E. T., Fundamentals of Steelmaking — BOF/EAF heat and mass balances; Callister, W. D., Materials Science and Engineering — TTT/CCT diagrams and phase transformations; Incropera, F. P. & DeWitt, D. P., Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer — liquid-metal (low-Pr) convection correlations.

Question 4: Liquid-Metal Plug Flow Over a Flat Plate — Penetration-Theory Derivation (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Liquid metal (very low Prandtl number) in plug (slug) flow at uniform velocity $U$ past a plate held at $\theta^S$, bulk temperature $\theta^B$ far from the wall. Because $Pr\ll1$ for liquid metals (Q1(n)), the momentum boundary layer is negligible compared with the thermal boundary layer — the velocity profile is essentially flat (plug flow) across the region where conduction actually matters.

Find. The transient/developing temperature profile $\theta(y,t)$, the local wall flux $q''(t)$, and its restatement as $Nu_x=f(Re_x,Pr)$.

plate at θS — x = 0 to x = L θᵇ (bulk), U (plug flow —) θS growing thermal boundary layer
Developing thermal boundary layer in liquid-metal plug flow: velocity is uniform ($Pr\ll1$), so exposure time at position $x$ is simply $t=x/U$.

Approach. Because the velocity is uniform (plug flow), a fluid element at distance $x$ from the leading edge has been in contact with the wall for exactly $t=x/U$ — so the 2-D steady convection problem collapses to the 1-D transient conduction problem into a semi-infinite medium suddenly exposed to a fixed surface temperature, with $t\to x/U$.

  1. Governing equation. With no velocity gradient (plug flow) and no streamwise conduction (thin thermal layer, high $Pe_x$), energy conservation for the liquid reduces to the 1-D transient conduction equation in the wall-normal coordinate $y$, with time re-interpreted as residence time: $$\dfrac{\partial\theta}{\partial t}=\alpha\dfrac{\partial^2\theta}{\partial y^2},\qquad \theta(y,0)=\theta^B,\ \ \theta(0,t)=\theta^S,\ \ \theta(\infty,t)=\theta^B$$
  2. Similarity solution. With $\eta=y/\sqrt{4\alpha t}$, the classical error-function solution for a semi-infinite medium with a suddenly-imposed surface temperature applies directly: $$\dfrac{\theta-\theta^S}{\theta^B-\theta^S}=\text{erf}(\eta)=\text{erf}\!\left(\dfrac{y}{\sqrt{4\alpha t}}\right)$$
  3. Wall heat flux. $q''(t)=-k\left.\dfrac{\partial\theta}{\partial y}\right|_{y=0}$. Differentiating $\text{erf}(\eta)$ and evaluating at $y=0$ ($d(\text{erf}\,\eta)/d\eta|_0=2/\sqrt{\pi}$): $$q''(t)=-k(\theta^B-\theta^S)\cdot\dfrac{-2/\sqrt{\pi}}{\sqrt{4\alpha t}}=\boxed{\dfrac{k(\theta^B-\theta^S)}{\sqrt{\pi\alpha t}}}$$ — exactly the quoted result, with the sign confirming heat flows from the hot bulk into the cooler wall.
  4. Substitute $t=x/U$ (plug flow, position $x$ along the plate). $$q''_x=\dfrac{k(\theta^B-\theta^S)}{\sqrt{\pi\alpha x/U}}\ \Rightarrow\ h_x=\dfrac{q''_x}{\theta^B-\theta^S}=\dfrac{k}{\sqrt{\pi\alpha x/U}}=k\sqrt{\dfrac{U}{\pi\alpha x}}$$
  5. Non-dimensionalise as a local Nusselt number. $Nu_x=h_x x/k$: $$Nu_x=\dfrac{x}{\sqrt{\pi\alpha x/U}}\cdot\dfrac1x\cdot x=\sqrt{\dfrac{Ux}{\pi\alpha}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{\pi}\cdot\dfrac{Ux}{\nu}\cdot\dfrac{\nu}{\alpha}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{Re_x\,Pr}{\pi}}$$ using $Re_x=Ux/\nu$ and $Pr=\nu/\alpha$: $$\boxed{Nu_x=\sqrt{\dfrac{Re_x\,Pr}{\pi}}}$$ — matching the quoted form exactly. (Averaging $Nu_x$ over $0\le x\le L$ doubles the coefficient to $Nu_{L,avg}=1.128\sqrt{Re_L\,Pr}$, the classical liquid-metal flat-plate correlation used directly in Question 7.)
Question 4 — final results
QuantityResult
Temperature profile$(\theta-\theta^S)/(\theta^B-\theta^S)=\text{erf}(y/\sqrt{4\alpha t})$
Interfacial flux$q''=k(\theta^B-\theta^S)/\sqrt{\pi\alpha t}$
Local Nusselt number$Nu_x=\sqrt{Re_x Pr/\pi}$