21-Mat-A2 Materials Transport Phenomena · December 2013
Question 4 of 9: Liquid-Metal Plug Flow Over a Flat Plate — Penetration-Theory Derivation
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams — December 2013 — Met-A2, Metallurgical Rate Phenomena. Three-hour, closed-book exam using an approved (Casio or Sharp) calculator, one double-sided aid sheet permitted; candidates were told to state any interpretive assumptions. Candidates answer Question 1 plus any four of Questions 2–9 — all nine are solved below for completeness. All questions are of equal value (20 marks each, five questions = 100%).
Reference texts: Geankoplis, C. J., Transport Processes and Separation Process Principles — mass/heat/momentum transfer fundamentals (Fick's/Newton's/Fourier's laws, boundary-layer correlations); Szekely, J. & Themelis, N. J., Rate Phenomena in Process Metallurgy — gas-halo diffusion, ladle/tundish fluid flow, wire injection; Turkdogan, E. T., Fundamentals of Steelmaking — BOF/EAF heat and mass balances; Callister, W. D., Materials Science and Engineering — TTT/CCT diagrams and phase transformations; Incropera, F. P. & DeWitt, D. P., Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer — liquid-metal (low-Pr) convection correlations.
Question 4: Liquid-Metal Plug Flow Over a Flat Plate — Penetration-Theory Derivation (20 marks)
Given. Liquid metal (very low Prandtl number) in plug (slug) flow at uniform velocity $U$ past a plate held at $\theta^S$, bulk temperature $\theta^B$ far from the wall. Because $Pr\ll1$ for liquid metals (Q1(n)), the momentum boundary layer is negligible compared with the thermal boundary layer — the velocity profile is essentially flat (plug flow) across the region where conduction actually matters.
Find. The transient/developing temperature profile $\theta(y,t)$, the local wall flux $q''(t)$, and its restatement as $Nu_x=f(Re_x,Pr)$.
Developing thermal boundary layer in liquid-metal plug flow: velocity is uniform ($Pr\ll1$), so exposure time at position $x$ is simply $t=x/U$.
Approach. Because the velocity is uniform (plug flow), a fluid element at distance $x$ from the leading edge has been in contact with the wall for exactly $t=x/U$ — so the 2-D steady convection problem collapses to the 1-D transient conduction problem into a semi-infinite medium suddenly exposed to a fixed surface temperature, with $t\to x/U$.
Governing equation. With no velocity gradient (plug flow) and no streamwise conduction (thin thermal layer, high $Pe_x$), energy conservation for the liquid reduces to the 1-D transient conduction equation in the wall-normal coordinate $y$, with time re-interpreted as residence time: $$\dfrac{\partial\theta}{\partial t}=\alpha\dfrac{\partial^2\theta}{\partial y^2},\qquad \theta(y,0)=\theta^B,\ \ \theta(0,t)=\theta^S,\ \ \theta(\infty,t)=\theta^B$$
Similarity solution. With $\eta=y/\sqrt{4\alpha t}$, the classical error-function solution for a semi-infinite medium with a suddenly-imposed surface temperature applies directly: $$\dfrac{\theta-\theta^S}{\theta^B-\theta^S}=\text{erf}(\eta)=\text{erf}\!\left(\dfrac{y}{\sqrt{4\alpha t}}\right)$$
Wall heat flux. $q''(t)=-k\left.\dfrac{\partial\theta}{\partial y}\right|_{y=0}$. Differentiating $\text{erf}(\eta)$ and evaluating at $y=0$ ($d(\text{erf}\,\eta)/d\eta|_0=2/\sqrt{\pi}$): $$q''(t)=-k(\theta^B-\theta^S)\cdot\dfrac{-2/\sqrt{\pi}}{\sqrt{4\alpha t}}=\boxed{\dfrac{k(\theta^B-\theta^S)}{\sqrt{\pi\alpha t}}}$$ — exactly the quoted result, with the sign confirming heat flows from the hot bulk into the cooler wall.
Substitute $t=x/U$ (plug flow, position $x$ along the plate). $$q''_x=\dfrac{k(\theta^B-\theta^S)}{\sqrt{\pi\alpha x/U}}\ \Rightarrow\ h_x=\dfrac{q''_x}{\theta^B-\theta^S}=\dfrac{k}{\sqrt{\pi\alpha x/U}}=k\sqrt{\dfrac{U}{\pi\alpha x}}$$
Non-dimensionalise as a local Nusselt number. $Nu_x=h_x x/k$: $$Nu_x=\dfrac{x}{\sqrt{\pi\alpha x/U}}\cdot\dfrac1x\cdot x=\sqrt{\dfrac{Ux}{\pi\alpha}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{\pi}\cdot\dfrac{Ux}{\nu}\cdot\dfrac{\nu}{\alpha}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{Re_x\,Pr}{\pi}}$$ using $Re_x=Ux/\nu$ and $Pr=\nu/\alpha$: $$\boxed{Nu_x=\sqrt{\dfrac{Re_x\,Pr}{\pi}}}$$ — matching the quoted form exactly. (Averaging $Nu_x$ over $0\le x\le L$ doubles the coefficient to $Nu_{L,avg}=1.128\sqrt{Re_L\,Pr}$, the classical liquid-metal flat-plate correlation used directly in Question 7.)