22-Mec-B2 Environmental Control in Buildings · May 2016
Question 8 of 8: Summer plant — supply air, coil capacity, apparatus dew point and bypass factor
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. Professional
Engineers of Ontario / Engineers Canada annual examination
07-Mec-B2 Environmental Control in Buildings, May 2016,
three hours, open book. Eight problems of 20 points each;
candidates are required to solve five, and all questions carry the same
value. Psychrometric charts and an R-134a p-h diagram are appended to the
paper. All eight problems are solved here, because the set is intended
as a study resource rather than an examination script.
Reference texts for this subject.
W. P. Jones, Air Conditioning Engineering, 5th ed.,
Butterworth-Heinemann — the standard reference for this
examination code; Ch. 2–3 (psychrometry), Ch. 5–6 (heating
and cooling loads), Ch. 10 (cooling towers), Ch. 15 (fans and duct
design).
McQuiston, Parker & Spitler, Heating, Ventilating and Air
Conditioning: Analysis and Design, 6th ed., Wiley — Ch. 3
(moist air), Ch. 6 (heating loads and infiltration), Ch. 8 (energy
estimating and the degree-day method), Ch. 12–13 (fluid flow, fans
and duct design).
Moran, Shapiro, Boettner & Bailey, Fundamentals of Engineering
Thermodynamics, 9th ed., Wiley — Ch. 10 (vapour-compression
refrigeration, multistage systems and heat pumps).
ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air
Quality; ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55, Thermal Environmental
Conditions for Human Occupancy.
Canadian frame: National Building Code of Canada 2020
and its Appendix C design temperatures; National Energy Code of Canada
for Buildings 2020; Environment and Climate Change Canada heating
degree-day normals; CSA B52 Mechanical Refrigeration Code;
Canadian federal halocarbon regulations (SOR/2003-289) for the
refrigerant discussion in Problem 7.
Check: assumptions carried through this
paper. Cover-page instruction 1 invites a clear statement of any
assumption. Standard barometric pressure of 101.325 kPa is used throughout;
moist-air properties follow the ASHRAE Handbook — Fundamentals Ch. 1
formulation (Hyland–Wexler saturation pressure, so results agree with
the appended chart to chart-reading accuracy rather than being read off it);
R-134a properties are on the IIR datum and agree with the appended p-h
diagram. Problem-specific assumptions — climate data, fuel prices,
emission factors, air-change rates, occupant density, duct roughness and the
coil bypass factor — are stated where they are first used.
Question 8: Summer plant — supply air, coil capacity, apparatus
dew point and bypass factor (20 marks)
Given. A space with a 12-ton cooling load of which 3 tons
is latent, held at 78 °F dry bulb and 50 % relative humidity,
requiring 1000 cfm of ventilation air on a day when the outdoor air is at
94 °F dry bulb and 55 % relative humidity; return air mixes with
the ventilation air ahead of a filter, fan and cooling coil, at sea level and
neglecting duct gain and fan temperature rise.
Given data
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Total room cooling load
—
12 tons = 144,000 Btu/h
Room latent load
$RLH$
3 tons = 36,000 Btu/h
Room sensible load
$RSH$
9 tons = 108,000 Btu/h
Room state
$t_R,\ \phi_R$
78 $^\circ$F, 50 %
Outdoor state
$t_O,\ \phi_O$
94 $^\circ$F, 55 %
Ventilation air
$\dot V_{oa}$
1000 cfm
Room sensible heat factor
$RSHF$
0.750
Find. (a) the plant arrangement, (b)–(c) the four
significant states with dry- and wet-bulb temperatures, plotted on the chart,
(d) the supply air rate, and (e) the coil capacity in kilowatts, the apparatus
dew point and the coil bypass factor.
(a) Diagram of the system
Mixed-air plant. Return air from the space is split between relief and recirculation; the recirculated fraction mixes with 1000 cfm of outdoor air at M, and the mixture passes through the filter, fan and cooling coil to the supply state S.
(b), (c) State points and the operating cycle
Approach. The supply temperature is not given, so it
cannot simply be assumed — instead use the Carrier effective-sensible-
heat-factor construction, which fixes the apparatus dew point from the room
state and the loads, and then derives the supply air quantity and state from
an assumed coil bypass factor. The mixed state follows from a mass balance
once the supply flow is known.
Check: assumed coil bypass factor.
The question asks for the bypass factor as an output, but the supply
air rate cannot be determined without either a supply temperature or a bypass
factor, so one assumption is unavoidable under cover-page instruction 1. A
bypass factor of 0.15 is assumed, typical of a four-row
chilled-water coil at about 500 ft/min face velocity. The construction is
then checked for self-consistency at the end: the bypass factor recovered
geometrically from the finished state points is 0.151, reproducing the
assumption, so the solution is internally closed rather than merely
assumed.
Room and outdoor states. At 78 °F and
50 % relative humidity, $W_R=0.010219$ lb/lb and $h_R=29.92$ Btu/lb;
at 94 °F and 55 %, $W_O=0.018986$ lb/lb and
$h_O=43.50$ Btu/lb. The room sensible heat factor is
$$RSHF=\frac{RSH}{RSH+RLH}=\frac{108,000}{144,000}=0.750$$
Load imposed by the ventilation air. Bringing
1000 cfm of outdoor air to the room state costs
$$OASH=1.10\,\dot V_{oa}\,(t_O-t_R)=1.10(1000)(94-78)
=17,600\ \text{Btu/h}$$
$$OALH=4840\,\dot V_{oa}\,(W_O-W_R)=4840(1000)(0.018986-0.010219)
=42,433\ \text{Btu/h}$$
The latent term dominates, which is characteristic of a humid summer design
day and is the reason the coil ends up so much larger than the room load.
Effective sensible heat factor. The bypassed fraction of
the outdoor air reaches the room without being treated, so it behaves exactly
like a room load; the treated fraction is handled at the coil. Adding only the
bypassed part to the room loads,
$$ERSH=RSH+BF\cdot OASH=108,000+0.15(17,600)=110,640\ \text{Btu/h}$$
$$ERLH=RLH+BF\cdot OALH=36,000+0.15(42,433)=42,365\ \text{Btu/h}$$
$$ESHF=\frac{ERSH}{ERSH+ERLH}=0.7231$$
Apparatus dew point. The $ESHF$ line drawn through the
room state meets the saturation curve at the apparatus dew point. In
$(t,W)$ coordinates that line has slope
$$\frac{dW}{dt}=\frac{1-ESHF}{ESHF}\cdot\frac{1.10}{4840}
=8.70\times 10^{-5}\ \text{lb/lb per }^\circ\text{F}$$
and solving $W_R+({dW}/{dt})(t-t_R)=W_{sat}(t)$ gives
$$\boxed{\;t_{adp}=50.74\ ^\circ\text{F}\;}$$
This is a comfortable dew point for a chilled-water coil; had it come out
below about 45 °F the design would have needed a lower bypass factor
or dehumidification by other means.
Wet-bulb temperatures of the four states. Solving the
adiabatic-saturation relation at each state gives room 65.02,
outdoor 80.07, mixed 68.65 and supply 53.93 °F,
collected in the table below.
(d) Air supply rate
Supply flow from the effective sensible load. Air
leaving the coil is a blend of air that contacted the fins, at the apparatus
dew point, and air that bypassed them, so the useful temperature difference is
only $(1-BF)(t_R-t_{adp})$:
$$\boxed{\;\dot V=\frac{ERSH}{1.10\,(1-BF)\,(t_R-t_{adp})}
=\frac{110,640}{1.10(0.85)(78-50.74)}
=4,341\ \text{cfm}\;}$$
Supply state. Back-substituting into the room sensible
and latent balances,
$$t_S=t_R-\frac{RSH}{1.10\,\dot V}
=78-\frac{108,000}{1.10(4,341)}=55.38\ ^\circ\text{F}$$
$$W_S=W_R-\frac{RLH}{4840\,\dot V}=0.008505\ \text{lb/lb}$$
a supply condition of 55.38 °F at 91.3 % relative
humidity, which is a normal leaving-coil state, and a 22.6 °F
temperature difference into the room — comfortably within the range that
ordinary ceiling diffusers can handle without dumping.
Mixed state. Converting to mass, the humid volumes are
$v_S=13.162$ and $v_O=14.384$ ft³/lb, so
$$\dot m_S=\frac{4,341}{13.162}=329.8\ \text{lb/min}
\qquad
\dot m_O=\frac{1000}{14.384}=69.52\ \text{lb/min}$$
an outdoor-air fraction of 0.2108, or 21.1 % by mass. Weighting
moisture and enthalpy,
$$W_M=0.012066\ \text{lb/lb} \qquad h_M=32.78\ \text{Btu/lb}
\qquad t_M=81.41\ ^\circ\text{F}$$
State points
Point
Dry bulb ($^\circ$F)
Wet bulb ($^\circ$F)
$W$ (lb/lb)
$h$ (Btu/lb)
O — outdoor / ventilation air
94.00
80.07
0.018986
43.50
R — room and return air
78.00
65.02
0.010219
29.92
M — mixed air, entering the coil
81.41
68.65
0.012066
32.78
S — supply air, leaving the coil
55.38
53.93
0.008505
22.53
ADP — apparatus dew point
50.74
50.74
saturated
—
The summer cycle. O and R mix to M; the coil line runs from M through S and extends to the apparatus dew point on the saturation curve; the room line from S to R has slope RSHF, and the ESHF line from R fixes the ADP.
(e) Coil capacity, apparatus dew point and bypass factor
Coil capacity. The coil sees the mixed state and
delivers the supply state, so
$$\boxed{\;\dot Q_{coil}=\dot m_S\,(h_M-h_S)\times 60
=329.8\,(32.78-22.53)(60)
=202,901\ \text{Btu/h}=59.46\ \text{kW}\;}$$
that is 16.91 tons. Checking against first principles, the coil
must absorb the room load plus the outdoor-air load:
144,000 + 56,647 = 200,647 Btu/h, agreeing within 1 %
— the residual is the density correction between the standard 1.10 and
4840 coefficients and the actual humid volume of 94 °F air.
Bypass factor, recovered from the geometry. The coil
line M–S extended must strike saturation at the apparatus dew point, and
the bypass factor is the fraction of the M-to-ADP interval that remains
untreated:
$$\boxed{\;BF=\frac{t_S-t_{adp}}{t_M-t_{adp}}
=\frac{55.38-50.74}{81.41-50.74}=0.151\;}$$
which reproduces the assumed 0.15 to within 1 %. That agreement is the
proof that the construction is closed: the assumption entered through the
$ESHF$ and comes back out of an independent geometric relation.
The most instructive number in this problem is the ratio of the coil to the
room load. The space needs 12 tons, but the coil must be selected for
16.91 — 27.9 % of its duty is spent on
1000 cfm of ventilation air, which is only 21.1 % of the air
it handles. Two thirds of that penalty is latent, because the outdoor air at
94 °F and 55 % carries almost twice the moisture of the room
air. It is exactly this term that an energy-recovery ventilator attacks: a
total-enthalpy wheel at 70 % effectiveness on the 1000 cfm would
recover about 41,000 Btu/h and cut the coil by more than three tons, for
no change to the space conditions. In a Canadian climate the same device pays
a second time in winter.