22-Mec-B2 Environmental Control in Buildings · December 2018
Question 3 of 8: Summer plant — mixing, chilled-water coil, reheat and plant energy
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, December 2018 —
16-Mec-B2 Environmental Control in Buildings. Three hours, open book
(an environmental-control text and steam tables are expected; any non-communicating calculator is
permitted). Eight problems are printed and candidates solve five: Problem 1 carries
30 points, Problem 2 carries 10 points and Problems 3–8 carry 20 points each, so the printed
paper totals 160 points and a graded script totals 100. Psychrometric charts (SI and IP) and an
R-134a pressure–enthalpy diagram are attached to the paper. All eight problems are worked
below.
McQuiston, Parker & Spitler, Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning: Analysis and
Design, 6th ed. — the CLTD/SCL/CLF cooling-load method, duct design and the
degree-day/bin energy methods.
Jones, Air Conditioning Engineering, 5th ed. — plant psychrometry, percentage
saturation, apparatus dew point and coil by-pass factor.
Incropera & DeWitt, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 8th ed., Ch. 3 —
one-dimensional composite-wall conduction; Table A.3 for building-material conductivities.
Stoecker & Jones, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning, 2nd ed. — vapour
compression cycles, compressor displacement and volumetric efficiency.
ASHRAE Refrigerant Tables for R-134a (datum hf = sf
= 0 at −40 °F, the datum of the attached chart).
Canadian context: National Energy Code of Canada for Buildings (NECB 2020), Canada Green
Building Council (CAGBC) LEED v4 and Zero Carbon Building Standard, and Environment and Climate
Change Canada Canadian Climate Normals for degree-day data.
Question 3: Summer plant — mixing, chilled-water coil, reheat and plant energy (20 marks)
2.0 kg s$^{-1}$ at $13\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$, 60% RH
Outdoor design (state O)
$27\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$, 70% RH
Mixing ratio, recirculated : fresh
3 : 1 (so 25% outdoor air)
Cooling-coil apparatus dew point
$5\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$
Refrigeration plant overall COP
2.0
Simplifications
sea level (101.325 kPa); friction, fan and pump work neglected
Find. The plant diagram and cycle, every state point with dry- and wet-bulb
temperature, the total room air-conditioning load, the total plant energy input, and the reduced input
when the reheat is taken from condenser cooling water.
Figure 3.1 (part a) — The plant. Return air from the zone splits, three
parts by mass recirculating to the mixing box against one part fresh; the mixture is cooled and
dehumidified to the coil condition C and then reheated to the supply state S.
Approach. Fix O, R and S from their dry-bulb and relative-humidity pairs; obtain
the mixed state from exact moisture and enthalpy balances at 25% outdoor air; use the given apparatus
dew point with the supply humidity ratio to find the coil by-pass factor and hence the off-coil state;
then take the coil and reheat duties as enthalpy differences on the 2.0 kg/s supply flow, and divide
the refrigeration duty by the COP.
Fix the three stated air states. With $p = 101.325$ kPa,
$W = 0.621945\,p_w/(p-p_w)$ and $h = 1.006t + W(2501+1.86t)$ kJ/kg$_{da}$:
Point
$t$ (°C)
$\phi$
$W$ (g/kg)
$h$ (kJ/kg)
$t_{wb}$ (°C)
O outdoor
27.00
70%
15.715
67.25
22.8
R zone / return
24.00
50%
9.299
47.81
17.1
S supply
13.00
60%
5.566
27.13
9.1
Mix the return and fresh streams. Adiabatic mixing conserves moisture and
enthalpy exactly, so with an outdoor-air mass fraction $x = 0.25$ both are mass-weighted:
$$W_M=xW_O+(1-x)W_R = 0.25(15.715)+0.75(9.299)=10.903\ \text{g/kg}$$
$$h_M=xh_O+(1-x)h_R = 0.25(67.25)+0.75(47.81)=52.68\ \text{kJ/kg}$$
The dry bulb is then derived from those two, not weighted:
$$\boxed{\;t_M=\frac{h_M-2501\,W_M}{1.006+1.86\,W_M}=24.76\,{}^{\circ}\text{C},\quad t_{wb,M}=18.6\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}\;}$$
Weighting the dry bulb directly would give $24.75\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$ — close, but it makes
$h(t_M,W_M)$ disagree with the mass-weighted $h_M$, because of the $Wt$ cross-term in the enthalpy
relation. Deriving $t_M$ instead makes $h(t_M,W_M) = h_M$ identically, which is a free check that the
mixing arithmetic is right.
Part (d) — total room air-conditioning load. The zone loads are stated
directly, and the total load is their sum:
$$\boxed{\;Q_{\text{room}} = q_s + q_l = 22.5+9.8 = 32.3\ \text{kW}\quad(\text{SHR}=0.697)\;}$$
Find the coil by-pass factor and the off-coil state. The apparatus dew point is
the saturated state the coil surface behaves as, here $5\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$ with
$W_{adp} = 5.402$ g/kg. The by-pass factor is the fraction of the air that leaves the coil untreated,
so on humidity ratio
$$\text{BF}=\frac{W_S-W_{adp}}{W_M-W_{adp}}=\frac{5.566-5.402}{10.903-5.402}=0.0298$$
and the same fraction applies to the temperature approach:
$$t_C = t_{adp}+\text{BF}\,(t_M-t_{adp}) = 5+0.0298(24.76-5)=5.59\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$$
giving $h_C = 19.60$ kJ/kg at 98.9% RH. A by-pass factor of only 3% means a deep, many-row coil that
takes the air almost exactly to its apparatus dew point — which is what the given supply
humidity ratio, barely above $W_{adp}$, demands.
Part (c) — the state points. Adding the mixed and off-coil states to the
table of step 1 completes the set plotted in Figure 3.2:
Point
Where
Dry bulb (°C)
Wet bulb (°C)
$W$ (g/kg)
$h$ (kJ/kg)
O
outdoor air
27.00
22.8
15.715
67.25
R
zone / return air
24.00
17.1
9.299
47.81
M
mixing-box exit / coil face
24.76
18.6
10.903
52.68
C
off cooling coil
5.59
5.5
5.566
19.60
S
supply to zone
13.00
9.1
5.566
27.13
ADP
apparatus dew point
5.00
5.0
5.402
18.59
Figure 3.2 (part b) — The cycle on the SI chart. R and O mix to M one
quarter of the way along RO; M→C is the coil process, whose line produced to saturation gives the
$5\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$ apparatus dew point; C→S is the horizontal reheat; S→R is the room
process.
Cooling-coil duty. The coil treats the whole 2.0 kg/s from M to C:
$$Q_{cool}=\dot m (h_M-h_C)=2.0\,(52.68-19.60)=\boxed{\;66.15\ \text{kW}\;}$$
of which the moisture removed is $\dot m\,\Delta W = 2.0(10.903-5.566)/1000 = 0.01067$ kg/s, or 38.4
kg per hour of condensate.
Reheat-coil duty. From C to S at constant humidity ratio:
$$Q_{heat}=\dot m (h_S-h_C)=2.0\,(27.13-19.60)=15.07\ \text{kW}$$
Because no moisture changes, this must also equal $\dot m c_p \Delta t = 2.0(1.0163)(13.00-5.59) =
15.07$ kW, which it does.
Part (e) — total energy input. The refrigeration plant delivers 66.15 kW of
cooling at a COP of 2, so it absorbs 33.08 kW; the heating coil, supplied conventionally, absorbs its
full 15.07 kW:
$$\boxed{\;E_{\text{total}}=\frac{Q_{cool}}{\text{COP}}+Q_{heat}=\frac{66.15}{2}+15.07=48.14\ \text{kW}\;}$$
Part (f) — reheat from condenser cooling water. The condenser must reject
everything the plant absorbs plus everything it removes from the air,
$Q_{cond} = 66.15+33.08 = 99.23$ kW. That is 6.6 times the 15.07 kW the reheat coil needs, so the
reheat is available as waste heat at no additional energy cost and the input collapses to the
compressor alone:
$$\boxed{\;E_{\text{recovered}}=\frac{Q_{cool}}{\text{COP}}=33.08\ \text{kW}\;}$$
a saving of 15.07 kW, or 31.3% of the total input. The caveat worth stating is one of temperature
rather than quantity: condenser water leaving at around $35\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$ is warm enough to
raise air from $5.6$ to $13\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$ with a comfortable approach, so the recovery is
genuinely practical here.
Result
Value
Mixed-air state M
$24.76\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$ db / $18.6\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$ wb, 10.903 g/kg
Coil by-pass factor
0.0298
Off-coil state C
$5.59\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$ db / $5.5\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$ wb, 98.9% RH
(d) Total room air-conditioning load
32.3 kW (22.5 sensible + 9.8 latent, SHR 0.697)
Cooling-coil duty / condensate
66.15 kW / 38.4 kg h$^{-1}$
Reheat-coil duty
15.07 kW
(e) Total energy input
48.14 kW
(f) Energy input with condenser-water reheat
33.08 kW (31.3% saving)
Check: the question is over-specified and the two data sets do not close. The
paper states the zone loads (22.5 kW sensible, 9.8 kW latent, SHR 0.697) and the supply state
and flow (2.0 kg/s at $13\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$, 60% RH). Taken literally, the supply-to-room process
would offset $2.0(47.81-27.13) = 41.36$ kW at SHR 0.541 — 22.36 kW sensible, which matches the
stated 22.5 kW to 0.6%, but 18.67 kW latent against the stated 9.8 kW. The sensible half agrees and
the latent half does not. Nothing has to be reconciled, because no part of the question needs both
sets: part (d) is answered from the stated loads, and parts (e) and (f) from the states
plus the mixing ratio and apparatus dew point. Flagged here under cover-page instruction 1.