22-Mec-B3 Energy Conversion and Power Generation · December 2018
Question 1 of 8: Gas Turbine
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 16-Mec-B3
Energy Conversion and Power Generation, National Examinations,
December 2018. Three hours, closed book. Two sections: Section A is
calculative (Questions 1–5) and Section B is descriptive
(Questions 6–8). Candidates answer four questions from Section A and two
from Section B; six questions of 10 marks each constitute a complete paper
(60 marks). Reference data for individual questions are bound in as
attachments on pages 10–12, reference formulae and constants on
pages 13–16, and Granet & Bluestein steam tables are supplied.
All eight questions are solved below, because the set is a
study resource rather than a timed attempt.
Reference texts.
Granet, I. and Bluestein, M., Thermodynamics and Heat Power, 6th ed.
— the steam tables issued with this paper, and the vapour-cycle and
gas-cycle chapters.
Çengel, Y. A. and Boles, M. A., Thermodynamics: An Engineering
Approach, 9th ed. — Brayton cycles, isentropic component
efficiencies, combined cycles, psychrometrics.
El-Wakil, M. M., Powerplant Technology — heat recovery steam
generators and pinch behaviour, cooling towers and their evaporative loss,
station heat rate and production cost, environmental impact of power
generation.
Rayaprolu, K., Boilers for Power and Process — pulverised-fuel
firing, vertical spindle mills, primary and tempering air, mill drying
capacity.
Lamarsh, J. R. and Baratta, A. J., Introduction to Nuclear
Engineering, 4th ed. — fission, the four-factor picture of a thermal
reactor, CANDU and PWR core materials.
Find. The T–s locus of the cycle, the actual
temperatures at compressor exit, turbine inlet and turbine exhaust, and the net
shaft power and thermal efficiency of the unit.
Part (a) — the T–s diagram. The four numbered
points to be calculated are 1 at the compressor inlet, 2 at the compressor
discharge, 3 at the turbine inlet and 4 at the turbine exhaust; the isentropic
ideals 2s and 4s are shown as well, because the machine efficiencies are defined
against them.
Figure 1.1 — T–s diagram of the open simple-cycle
gas turbine. Solid red = the actual path; grey dashed = the isentropic ideals
2s and 4s used to apply the machine efficiencies. The lower isobar is
atmospheric (100 kPa), the upper one the combustor pressure (1.20 MPa). The
process 4 → 1 is not a heat exchanger; the machine is open and
the exhaust is discharged, so the dotted return is a bookkeeping closure only.
Approach. Compress isentropically to find $T_{2s}$ and
correct it with $\eta_c$; close a steady-flow energy balance on the combustor
using the product mass flow and the hot-gas $c_p$ to obtain the turbine
inlet temperature; expand isentropically to $T_{4s}$ and correct with
$\eta_t$; then difference the turbine and compressor powers.
Part (b) — ideal compressor discharge temperature.
For an isentropic compression of an ideal gas,
$$\frac{T_{2s}}{T_1}=r^{(k_a-1)/k_a},\qquad
\frac{k_a-1}{k_a}=\frac{1.3997-1}{1.3997}=0.28556 .$$
The compressor works on cold air, so $k_a=c_{p,a}/c_{v,a}=1.005/0.718=1.3997$
from the paper's page-14 constants. Substituting,
$T_{2s}=288.15\times 12^{0.28556}=288.15\times 2.0331=585.84\ \text{K}=312.7\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$.
Actual compressor discharge temperature. The isentropic
efficiency of a compressor compares the ideal work with the real work at the
same pressure ratio, so
$$\eta_c=\frac{T_{2s}-T_1}{T_2-T_1}
\quad\Longrightarrow\quad
T_2=T_1+\frac{T_{2s}-T_1}{\eta_c}=288.15+\frac{585.84-288.15}{0.90}.$$
The bracket is a 297.69 K ideal rise, which the 90 per cent efficiency inflates
to 330.77 K, so
$$\boxed{T_2=618.92\ \text{K}=345.8\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}}$$
at the compressor discharge.
Combustor energy balance — turbine inlet temperature.
The paper's Note requires the changed mass flow and specific heat to be
carried through, and the turbine inlet temperature is one of the "conditions of
the gas in the turbine". The products leaving the combustor are air plus fuel,
$$\dot{M}_g=\dot{M}_a+\dot{M}_f=142+2.68=144.68\ \text{kg/s},$$
and the heat released is
$\dot{Q}_{in}=\dot{M}_f\,CV=2.68\times 40\,000=107\,200\ \text{kW}$.
Applying the steady-flow energy equation across the combustor with the hot-gas
specific heat,
$$\Delta T_{comb}=\frac{\dot{Q}_{in}}{\dot{M}_g\,c_{p,g}}
=\frac{107\,200}{144.68\times 1.148}=\frac{107\,200}{166.09}=645.4\ \text{K},$$
so that
$$\boxed{T_3=618.92+645.4=1264.3\ \text{K}=991.2\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}}$$
at the turbine inlet.
Ideal turbine exhaust temperature. The turbine expands the
same 12:1 pressure ratio back to atmosphere, but with the hot-gas index,
$$\frac{k_g-1}{k_g}=\frac{0.333}{1.333}=0.24981,\qquad
12^{0.24981}=1.8603 ,$$
so $T_{4s}=T_3/1.8603=1264.34/1.8603=679.66\ \text{K}=406.5\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$.
The exponent is materially smaller than the cold-air one, which is precisely why
the note insists on it: using the air value here would put the ideal exhaust
temperature some 58 K too low (621.9 K instead of 679.7 K).
Actual turbine exhaust temperature. For a turbine the
efficiency is the ratio of real to ideal work, so the real temperature drop is
the smaller one:
$$T_4=T_3-\eta_t\,(T_3-T_{4s})=1264.34-0.88\times(1264.34-679.66),$$
and with the ideal drop equal to 584.68 K the actual drop is 514.52 K, giving
$$\boxed{T_4=749.82\ \text{K}=476.7\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}}$$
at the turbine exhaust flange. This is the temperature the heat recovery steam
generator of Question 2 would see. The 560 °C that Question 2
quotes belongs to a different, hotter machine (that question states it can be
completed without reference to this one), so no agreement is expected; ducting
losses could only lower this 477 °C, never raise it to 560 °C.
Part (c) — turbine and compressor powers. Each machine
is a steady-flow device handling its own stream:
$$\dot{W}_t=\dot{M}_g\,c_{p,g}\,(T_3-T_4)=144.68\times 1.148\times 514.52
=85\,451\ \text{kW},$$
$$\dot{W}_c=\dot{M}_a\,c_{p,a}\,(T_2-T_1)=142\times 1.005\times 330.77
=47\,204\ \text{kW}.$$
The compressor handles only air, the turbine air plus fuel — that
2.68 kg/s difference is worth about 1.6 MW of turbine work and is the reason
the note exists.
Net power output and thermal efficiency. Differencing the
two shaft powers,
$$\boxed{\dot{P}_{net}=85\,451-47\,204=38\,247\ \text{kW}=38.2\ \text{MW}}$$
and, referring that to the fuel energy admitted,
$$\boxed{\eta_{th}=\frac{\dot{P}_{net}}{\dot{Q}_{in}}
=\frac{38\,247}{107\,200}=0.357=35.7\ \text{per cent}} .$$
As a plausibility check, the back-work ratio is
$\dot{W}_c/\dot{W}_t=47\,204/85\,451=0.552$, comfortably inside the
0.40–0.60 band typical of a simple-cycle industrial machine; a value
outside it would mean a machine efficiency had been applied the wrong way
round.
Check: the combustor is closed on the product flow. The
paper's Note 6 invites a statement of assumptions. Here the combustor is closed
on $\dot{M}_g=144.68$ kg/s at $c_{p,g}=1.148$, treating the incoming air as
already having become products. Closing it instead on the same 144.68 kg/s but at the
cold-air $c_p=1.005$ raises $T_3$ to about 1083 °C and the output to 44.5 MW,
which credits the cycle with energy the fuel never supplied, because the air
would then be carried at a different specific heat from the products it becomes.
The reading used here is the one the Note's wording requires.