22-Mec-B3 Energy Conversion and Power Generation · December 2018
Question 2 of 8: Heat Recovery Steam Generator
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 16-Mec-B3
Energy Conversion and Power Generation, National Examinations,
December 2018. Three hours, closed book. Two sections: Section A is
calculative (Questions 1–5) and Section B is descriptive
(Questions 6–8). Candidates answer four questions from Section A and two
from Section B; six questions of 10 marks each constitute a complete paper
(60 marks). Reference data for individual questions are bound in as
attachments on pages 10–12, reference formulae and constants on
pages 13–16, and Granet & Bluestein steam tables are supplied.
All eight questions are solved below, because the set is a
study resource rather than a timed attempt.
Reference texts.
Granet, I. and Bluestein, M., Thermodynamics and Heat Power, 6th ed.
— the steam tables issued with this paper, and the vapour-cycle and
gas-cycle chapters.
Çengel, Y. A. and Boles, M. A., Thermodynamics: An Engineering
Approach, 9th ed. — Brayton cycles, isentropic component
efficiencies, combined cycles, psychrometrics.
El-Wakil, M. M., Powerplant Technology — heat recovery steam
generators and pinch behaviour, cooling towers and their evaporative loss,
station heat rate and production cost, environmental impact of power
generation.
Rayaprolu, K., Boilers for Power and Process — pulverised-fuel
firing, vertical spindle mills, primary and tempering air, mill drying
capacity.
Lamarsh, J. R. and Baratta, A. J., Introduction to Nuclear
Engineering, 4th ed. — fission, the four-factor picture of a thermal
reactor, CANDU and PWR core materials.
Find. The temperature profile of both streams, the enthalpy
at each key point, the steam mass flow rate, the pinch-point temperature
difference, and the physical arrangement that produces that profile.
Figure 2.1 — Part (a): temperature against path
length along the gas flow. Red = gas, blue = water and steam; the two streams
are in counterflow, so the water enters at the right where the gas leaves. Gas
points 1–4 and water points a–d are keyed to the tables below. The
horizontal blue segment is the evaporator, where the water boils at the
saturation temperature of 1.40 MPa; the smallest vertical gap between the two
lines — the pinch — falls at the evaporator/economiser boundary
(point 3 / point c), not at either terminal.
Approach. Take the total duty from the gas side, since both
gas terminal temperatures are given; get the steam enthalpy rise from the steam
tables; divide to obtain the steam flow; then split the duty into superheater,
evaporator and economiser and walk the gas temperature back from the stack to
locate the pinch.
Part (b) — enthalpies at the key points. The water
side is fixed by the pressure of 1.40 MPa, at which the steam tables give
$T_{sat}=195.07\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$, $h_f=830.30$ kJ/kg and
$h_g=2790.0$ kJ/kg (so $h_{fg}=1959.7$ kJ/kg). The feedwater is a compressed
liquid at 30 °C, for which
$h_d\simeq h_f(30\,{}^{\circ}\text{C})=125.8$ kJ/kg; the pressure correction
$v\,\Delta p = 0.001004\times 1395.8 = 1.4$ kJ/kg is negligible against a
3400 kJ/kg rise and is neglected. The superheated outlet at 1.40 MPa and
540 °C is interpolated between the 500 °C and 600 °C table entries,
$$h_a=3474.1+\frac{540-500}{100}\,(3694.8-3474.1)=3562.4\ \text{kJ/kg}.$$
Collecting the four water-side points. Reading along the
water path from inlet to outlet gives the values tabulated below, which are the
four numbers part (b) asks for.
Point
State
Temperature
Enthalpy
d
compressed liquid feedwater
30 °C
125.8 kJ/kg
c
saturated liquid, 1.40 MPa
195.07 °C
830.3 kJ/kg
b
saturated vapour, 1.40 MPa
195.07 °C
2790.0 kJ/kg
a
superheated steam, 1.40 MPa
540 °C
3562.4 kJ/kg
Part (c) — total duty and steam mass flow rate. The
gas side is fully determined, so it fixes the duty:
$$\dot{Q}=\dot{M}_g\,c_{p,g}\,(T_1-T_4)=125\times 1.148\times(560-130)
=143.5\times 430=61\,705\ \text{kW}.$$
The water absorbs all of it (an unfired heat recovery steam generator is
adiabatic to atmosphere), and its enthalpy rise is
$h_a-h_d=3562.4-125.8=3436.6$ kJ/kg, so
$$\boxed{\dot{M}_{steam}=\frac{61\,705}{3436.6}=17.96\ \text{kg/s}} ,$$
about one seventh of the gas flow — a ratio typical of an unfired
single-pressure recovery boiler.
Part (d) — splitting the duty between the three surfaces.
With the steam flow known, each surface's duty follows from the enthalpy
interval it covers:
$$\dot{Q}_{econ}=\dot{M}_{steam}(h_c-h_d)=17.96\times 704.5=12\,649\ \text{kW},$$
$$\dot{Q}_{evap}=\dot{M}_{steam}\,h_{fg}=17.96\times 1959.7=35\,187\ \text{kW},$$
$$\dot{Q}_{sup}=\dot{M}_{steam}(h_a-h_b)=17.96\times 772.4=13\,869\ \text{kW}.$$
These sum to 61 705 kW, reproducing the gas-side duty exactly, which confirms
the steam flow.
Locating the pinch. The pinch is at the point where the
water first reaches saturation, because that is where the water-side line goes
flat while the gas-side line keeps falling. Working the gas back from
the stack through the economiser only,
$$\Delta T_{gas,econ}=\frac{\dot{Q}_{econ}}{\dot{M}_g c_{p,g}}
=\frac{12\,649}{143.5}=88.2\ \text{K},$$
so the gas at the evaporator outlet is at
$130+88.2=218.2\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$. Working forward instead — taking
the superheater and evaporator duties off the 560 °C inlet — gives
$560-96.6-245.2=218.2\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$, the same value from the opposite
direction, which is the check worth doing.
The pinch-point temperature difference. Subtracting the
saturation temperature of the boiling water at that same station,
$$\boxed{\Delta T_{pinch}=218.2-195.07=23.1\ \text{K}} .$$
Every other terminal difference is larger — 20 K at the superheater end
(560 against 540) and 100 K at the stack end (130 against 30) — so 23.1 K
is indeed the closest approach anywhere in the unit, and it is comfortably
positive, so there is no temperature cross.
Part (e) — why the pinch governs the design. The
pinch is the tightest approach temperature in the whole exchanger, and since
the local heat flux is proportional to the local temperature difference, it is
the point where surface area is bought most dearly. Narrowing the pinch
recovers more heat: the gas can be cooled further before the economiser, the
stack temperature falls, and both the steam flow and the bottoming-cycle output
rise. But the surface required to transfer a given duty varies as
$1/\Delta T$, so the last few kelvin cost disproportionate tube area, pressure
drop and capital. A single-pressure unit is therefore normally designed to a
pinch of roughly 10–25 K, and the 23.1 K found here sits at the relaxed
end of that band. The pinch also fixes what the plant can do off design: as
load falls the gas flow and inlet temperature change, the pinch migrates, and
if it were set too tight at design point it can close to zero or invert at part
load, at which point the evaporator simply stops generating. Finally, the pinch
is the reason modern combined-cycle plants use two or three pressure levels
— each additional pressure adds another evaporator with its own pinch
lower down the gas path, so the gas can be cooled closer to the feedwater
temperature without any single approach becoming impossibly tight.
Part (f) — the physical arrangement. The three
surfaces must be strung along the gas path in the order that puts the hottest
surface in the hottest gas: superheater first, then evaporator, then economiser
nearest the stack, with the water flowing in the opposite direction. The
evaporator is not a once-through pass but a natural-circulation loop hung off a
steam drum, as sketched below.
Figure 2.2 — Part (f): the actual arrangement.
Gas flows upward through the casing past superheater, evaporator and economiser
in that order; feedwater enters the economiser at d, leaves it as saturated
water at c and passes to the steam drum; the drum feeds the evaporator through
downcomers and receives the saturated mixture back through risers at b; dry
saturated steam is taken from the top of the drum to the superheater and leaves
at a. The letters match Figure 2.1.