25-Nav-A1 Fundamentals of Naval Architecture · May-98-Mar-A1 2017
Question 3 of 8: Gas Turbine Jet Engine — Static Thrust
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Examinations, May 2017 — 98-Mar-A1 Applied Thermodynamics and Heat Transfer, 3 hours, open book (Part A: Thermodynamics, Part B: Heat Transfer; 5 of 8 questions required, all 8 answered below for full study coverage).
Reference texts: Cengel & Boles, Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach; Sonntag, Borgnakke & Van Wylen, Fundamentals of Thermodynamics; Incropera & DeWitt, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer.
It is solved as the thermodynamics/heat-transfer exam it actually is.
Turbojet station numbering for the static test-bed cycle.
Find. Nozzle exit velocity and static thrust.
Approach. Walk the Brayton-cycle stations with actual (efficiency-corrected) compressor and turbine work, then expand the turbine-exit gas through the nozzle to ambient pressure using the nozzle efficiency; thrust follows from momentum (inlet velocity negligible on a static test bed).
Compressor (1→2, actual). $T_{2s}=T_1r_p^{(k-1)/k}=253.15\times8^{0.2857}=458.6\text{ K}$, so $\Delta T_s=205.4\text{ K}$ and, with $\eta_c=\Delta T_s/\Delta T_{actual}$,
$$\Delta T_{2,actual}=205.4/0.88=233.4\text{ K}\ \Rightarrow\ T_2=253.15+233.4=486.6\text{ K}\ (213.4\,{}^{\circ}\text{C})$$
$P_2=P_1r_p=8(101.325)=810.6\text{ kPa}$; compressor work $w_c=c_p\Delta T_{2,actual}=1.005(233.4)=234.6\text{ kJ/kg}$.
Turbine (3→4). In a turbojet the turbine drives only the compressor, so $w_t=w_c=234.6\text{ kJ/kg}$, giving $\Delta T_{34,actual}=w_t/c_p=233.4\text{ K}$ and $T_4=1273.15-233.4=1039.7\text{ K}\ (766.6\,{}^{\circ}\text{C})$. With $\eta_t=\Delta T_{actual}/\Delta T_s$, the isentropic drop is $\Delta T_s=233.4/0.88=265.3\text{ K}$, so $T_{4s}=1007.9\text{ K}$ and
$$P_4=P_2\left(\dfrac{T_{4s}}{T_3}\right)^{k/(k-1)}=810.6\times\left(\dfrac{1007.9}{1273.15}\right)^{3.5}=357.8\text{ kPa}$$
Nozzle (4→5, expansion to ambient). $T_{5s}=T_4(P_1/P_4)^{(k-1)/k}=1039.7\times(101.325/357.8)^{0.2857}=725.0\text{ K}$, so the isentropic drop is $314.6\text{ K}$ and, with $\eta_n=\Delta T_{actual}/\Delta T_s$,
$$\Delta T_{noz,actual}=0.90(314.6)=283.2\text{ K}$$
Exit velocity and static thrust. With the nozzle inlet velocity neglected,
$$V_5=\sqrt{2c_p\Delta T_{noz,actual}}=\sqrt{2(1005)(283.2)}=\boxed{754.5\text{ m/s}}$$
$$F=\dot m(V_5-V_1)=25(754.5-0)=\boxed{18{,}860\text{ N}=18.9\text{ kN}}$$
Check: the nozzle is treated as expanding fully to ambient pressure (101.3 kPa) with the given 90% nozzle efficiency — the standard exam-level treatment implied by supplying $\eta_n$. A rigorous check shows the critical pressure ratio for air ($P_4/P_{crit}\approx1.89$) would actually choke this converging nozzle at a back-pressure of $\approx189\text{ kPa}$, above ambient; a fully choked analysis would add a pressure-thrust term $A_5(P_5-P_1)$ evaluated at sonic exit conditions. That refinement is beyond the scope implied by the given data and is flagged here rather than silently assumed away.