Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams, December 2015 — 98-Pet-B3, Oil and Gas Evaluation and Economics (3 hours, closed book, approved non-programmable calculator only). The exam's own cover page is titled "Oil and Gas Evaluation and Economics" and every question is property valuation / reserves & production economics / DCF-NPV screening content — no geology anywhere.
Reference texts: Thompson & Wright, Oil Property Evaluation; Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook (COGEH), Vol. 1 (Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers, Calgary Chapter); National Instrument 51-101, Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities (Canadian Securities Administrators); SPE/WPC/AAPG/SPEE Petroleum Resources Management System (PRMS); Ahmed, Reservoir Engineering Handbook.
The exam's own instructions ask for only 7 of the 10 short-answer questions and note the Cash-Flow/Future-Value tables are graded by column; for "choose N of M" exams, every item below is answered in full as a study resource. Questions 1–10 correspond to the exam's printed Short-Answer items 1–10; Questions 11–20 correspond to the printed Multiple-Choice items 1–10; Question 21 is the Future Value table; Question 22 is the Cash Flow table.
Given. A shale-oil well is drilled, fractured and tied in for a total (100%-interest) capital cost of $10,000,000, spent in Year 1. The Working Interest (WI) owner holds 50%; a 5% royalty is paid to the mineral owner. Average gross production is 500 BOPD in Year 1, declining 30%/yr; oil price is $50/bbl in Year 1, increasing $10/yr; total OPEX is 15% of total capital in Year 1, increasing 10%/yr; the Hurdle Rate is 10%. Taxes and inflation are ignored; all values are shown to the nearest thousand dollars (k$).
Find. The complete Cash Flow table (12 columns, Years 1–4) for the WI owner, and whether the investment meets the 10% Hurdle Rate, the return on investment, and the approximate payout.
Fig. Q22-1 — net production income to the WI owner by year: Year 1 is negative (CAPEX exceeds first-year net revenue), turning cumulatively positive during Year 2.
Approach. Build the WI owner's production and price stream year by year, split gross production down to net (WI, then royalty), form revenue, subtract the WI owner's share of CAPEX and OPEX to get net income, then test that stream against the hurdle rate by discounting.
Production and revenue (Year 1 shown; repeat for Years 2–4). Gross production declines 30%/yr from 500 BOPD: $$\text{Gross}_1 = 500\times365 = \boxed{182{,}500\text{ bbl}}$$Split to net-of-royalty production, then apply the year's oil price:$$\text{WI share} = 182{,}500\times0.50 = 91{,}250\text{ bbl}, \quad \text{Royalty} = 91{,}250\times0.05 = 4{,}562.5\text{ bbl}$$$$\text{Net}_1 = 91{,}250 - 4{,}562.5 = 86{,}687.5\text{ bbl}, \quad \text{Revenue}_1 = \frac{86{,}687.5\times\$50}{1000} = \boxed{4{,}334.4\text{ k\$}}$$Years 2–4 repeat the same three steps with production declining 30%/yr further and price rising $10/bbl/yr.
CAPEX and OPEX (WI share). All CAPEX falls in Year 1: $$\text{CAPEX}_1 = \frac{\$10{,}000{,}000\times0.50}{1000} = \boxed{5{,}000\text{ k\$}}, \qquad \text{CAPEX}_{2,3,4}=0$$Total OPEX (100% interest) starts at 15% of total capital and escalates 10%/yr, then is scaled by WI:$$\text{OPEX}_{1,\text{total}} = 0.15\times\$10{,}000{,}000 = \$1{,}500{,}000, \qquad \text{OPEX}_{1,\text{WI}} = \frac{1{,}500{,}000\times0.50}{1000} = \boxed{750\text{ k\$}}$$
Net income, cumulative, and NPV@10%. $$\text{Net Income}_1 = \text{Rev}_1 - \text{CAPEX}_1 - \text{OPEX}_1 = 4{,}334.4 - 5{,}000 - 750 = \boxed{-1{,}415.6\text{ k\$}}$$discounted at the 10% hurdle rate using the same start-of-year = time-zero convention as Q21 (Year-n net income divided by $(1.10)^{n-1}$), and running the cumulative total forward, gives the full table below.
Hurdle-rate test, ROI, and payout. Summing column 12 (NPV@10%) over all 4 years and comparing to summed column 8 (total CAPEX), per the exam's own stated condition “(12) > (8)”:$$\sum \text{NPV} = 3{,}888.8\text{ k\$} \; \ngtr \; \sum \text{CAPEX} = 5{,}000\text{ k\$} \;\Rightarrow\; \boxed{\text{Hurdle Rate NOT met within the 4-year window}}$$Return on investment (undiscounted, per the exam's own formula (cum.\ income)/(total investment)):$$ROI = \frac{4{,}846.6}{5{,}000} = \boxed{0.969 \;(96.9\%)}$$Payout — cumulative net income is still negative at the end of Year 1 (−1,415.6) and turns positive during Year 2 (+2,815.9 for the year), so payout falls partway through Year 2:$$\text{Payout} = 1 + \frac{1{,}415.6}{2{,}815.9} = \boxed{\approx 1.50\text{ years}}$$
Check: gross production is converted from BOPD to an annual volume using 365 days/yr (a standard exam-level simplification; no partial-year/leap-year adjustment is given in the source), and total CAPEX is assumed spent entirely in Year 1 (the well is “drilled, fractured and tied in” before the Year-1 production stream begins) since the source gives no capital-phasing schedule.
Completed Cash Flow table — WI owner, all $ values in k$
Yr
Gross Prod. (bbl)
WI Share (bbl)
Royalty (bbl)
Net Prod. (bbl)
Oil Price ($/bbl)
Prod. Revenue
CAPEX
OPEX
Net Prod. Income
Cumulative Net Income
NPV @ 10%
1
182,500
91,250
4,562
86,688
50
4,334.4
5,000.0
750.0
-1,415.6
-1,415.6
-1,415.6
2
127,750
63,875
3,194
60,681
60
3,640.9
0.0
825.0
2,815.9
1,400.2
2,559.9
3
89,425
44,712
2,236
42,477
70
2,973.4
0.0
907.5
2,065.9
3,466.1
1,707.3
4
62,598
31,299
1,565
29,734
80
2,378.7
0.0
998.2
1,380.5
4,846.6
1,037.2
Totals
—
—
—
—
—
13,327.3
5,000.0
3,480.8
4,846.6
—
3,888.8
Final results (WI owner, 4-year window)
Quantity
Value
Total net production income (undiscounted)
4,846.6 k$
Total CAPEX
5,000.0 k$
Total NPV @ 10% hurdle rate
3,888.8 k$
Hurdle Rate met? (12) > (8)?
No (3,888.8 < 5,000.0)
Return on Investment (cum. income / total investment)